Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Forces. 2022 May 19;101(3):1422–1459. doi: 10.1093/sf/soac043

Table 4.

Multilevel Mixed Effects Ordered Probit Models Predicting Frequency of Happiness in Past 2 Weeks

Model 1: Global Quality Model 2: Validation Model 3: Frequency of disagreements Model 4: All
Fixed effects Estimate p (RSE) Estimate p (RSE) Estimate p (RSE) Estimate p (RSE)
Partnership quality
Within global quality 0.37 *** (0.04) 0.27 *** (0.04)
Between global quality 0.52 *** (0.10) 0.28 * (0.12)
Within validation 0.58 *** (0.06) 0.34 *** (0.07)
Between validation 1.04 *** (0.19) 0.69 ** (0.25)
Within frequency of disagreements −0.19 *** (0.05) −0.10 * (0.04)
Between frequency of disagreements −0.50 *** (0.12) −0.36 ** (0.11)
Childhood family exposures
Poor maternal relationship quality (ref: none)
 Age 3 or age 5 only 0.01 (0.17) −0.02 (0.16) 0.09 (0.17) 0.05 (0.16)
 Age 9 only 0.01 (0.31) 0.11 (0.31) −0.05 (0.30) −0.04 (0.33)
 Early and later −0.24 (0.26) −0.39 (0.24) −0.11 (0.26) −0.33 (0.26)
Maternal psychological harsh parenting (ref: none)
 Age 3 or age 5 only −0.23 (0.23) −0.23 (0.23) −0.18 (0.23) −0.20 (0.23)
 Age 9 only −0.44 (0.28) −0.53 (0.27) −0.53 * (0.27) −0.52 (0.28)
 Early and later −0.32 (0.28) −0.31 (0.27) −0.50 (0.29) −0.29 (0.28)
Maternal physical harsh parenting (ref: none)
 Age 3 or age 5 only 0.07 (0.20) 0.03 (0.19) 0.08 (0.19) 0.00 (0.19)
 Age 9 only 0.23 (0.28) 0.39 (0.29) 0.28 (0.28) 0.34 (0.27)
 Early and later −0.03 (0.30) 0.10 (0.30) 0.05 (0.31) −0.01 (0.32)
Partnership type (ref: dating)
 Friends w/benefits 0.07 (0.13) −0.06 (0.13) −0.34 ** (0.12) 0.07 (0.14)
 Talking/flirting −0.27 ** (0.08) −0.34 *** (0.07) −0.57 *** (0.08) −0.31 *** (0.08)
 Other −0.55 *** (0.15) −0.70 *** (0.18) −1.00 *** (0.16) −0.61 *** (0.16)
Baseline happiness 1.07 *** (0.09) 1.05 *** (0.09) 1.09 *** (0.09) 1.04 *** (0.09)
Survey wave 0.01 * (0.01) 0.01 * (0.01) 0.01 (0.01) 0.01 * (0.01)
Sociodemographic characteristics
Female −0.32 * (0.13) −0.39 ** (0.13) −0.23 (0.14) −0.26 (0.13)
Age at baseline (months) 0.00 (0.02) 0.00 (0.02) 0.01 (0.02) 0.00 (0.02)
Race/ethnicity (ref: NH White)
 Non-Hispanic Black −0.04 (0.21) −0.11 (0.21) −0.25 (0.21) −0.09 (0.21)
 Hispanic/Latino −0.23 (0.22) −0.29 (0.20) −0.25 (0.21) −0.26 (0.21)
 Non-Hispanic Other −0.36 (0.31) −0.41 (0.31) −0.17 (0.34) −0.43 (0.30)
 Non-Hispanic Multi-racial −0.08 (0.30) −0.15 (0.29) −0.06 (0.30) −0.13 (0.27)
Mother’s completed education (ref: < high school diploma)
 High school diploma/GED −0.01 (0.19) −0.02 (0.19) −0.12 (0.18) −0.03 (0.18)
 Some college/technical 0.21 (0.20) 0.22 (0.20) 0.02 (0.19) 0.15 (0.19)
 BA/BS or graduate school 0.56 * (0.26) 0.41 (0.25) 0.34 (0.25) 0.36 (0.25)
Mother’s poverty ratio at baseline (ref: 0–49% of FPL)
 50–99% of FPL −0.05 (0.24) −0.03 (0.25) 0.01 (0.24) −0.08 (0.24)
 100–199% of FPL 0.33 (0.23) 0.28 (0.24) 0.20 (0.22) 0.23 (0.23)
 200–299% of FPL 0.18 (0.27) 0.16 (0.27) 0.09 (0.26) 0.06 (0.27)
 300% + of FPL 0.29 (0.26) 0.23 (0.25) 0.22 (0.24) 0.17 (0.25)
Mother’s marital status at birth (ref: not married or cohabiting)
 Married −0.27 (0.23) −0.13 (0.22) −0.32 (0.22) −0.14 (0.22)
 Cohabiting −0.19 (0.16) −0.20 (0.16) −0.16 (0.16) −0.14 (0.15)
Mother’s age at time of birth −0.01 (0.01) −0.01 (0.01) −0.01 (0.01) −0.01 (0.01)
Mother US-born −0.17 (0.23) −0.29 (0.21) −0.08 (0.23) −0.18 (0.22)
Random effects ([co=]variances) Estimate (RSE) Estimate (RSE) Estimate (RSE) Estimate (RSE)
Intercept 1.03 (0.13) 0.97 (0.12) 1.02 (0.13) 0.94 (0.12)
Within partnership quality 0.07 (0.03) 0.18 (0.07) 0.10 (0.04) 0.06 (0.02)
Intercept & w/in partnership quality −0.09 (0.05) −0.16 (0.09) 0.15 * (0.07) −0.10 * (0.05)

Source: mDiary Study of Adolescent Relationships and FFCWS

Notes:

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001;

p < 0.10.

Results for “missing” race/ethnicity category not shown. In Models 1–3, the random effect for “partnership quality” corresponds to the within-partnership quality measure being used in the model. In Model 4, random effects are included for only global quality, not validation and frequency of disagreements.