Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jun 27;56(1):53–79. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02150-0

Table 3.

Summary statistics for gaze rotation angle accuracy and precision in Fig. 7A*

Calibration P2 Head Restrained
P2 Head Unrestrained
P1 with EyeLink
P2 with EyeLink
Accuracy [°] Precision [°] Accuracy [°] Precision [°] Accuracy [°] Precision [°] Accuracy [°] Precision [°]
Mean ± std median [q25 q75] std Mean ± std median [q25 q75] std Mean ± std median [q25 q75] std Mean ± std median [q25 q75] std

5 pts 2.0 [1.4 2.4] 0.9 2.5 ± 1.1 0.5 1.5 [1.0 1.8] 0.3 1.4 [0.8 2.6] 0.2
9 pts 1.8 ± 1.0 0.8 2.6 ± 1.0 0.4 1.2 ± 0.8 0.2 1.9 [1.2 2.5] 0.2
13 pts 1.8 ± 0.9 0.8 1.9 [1.4 2.8] 0.5 1.2 ± 0.8 0.2 1.5 [1.1 2.7] 0.2
Star 1.5 [1.1 2.5] 0.4 2.6 [1.1 4.7] 0.5 1.0 [0.5 2.1] 0.1 1.6 [1.1 3.3] 0.4
aVOR 2.9 ± 0.9 0.4

The bold headings correspond to the numbers in bold in the cells where mean/std values were used

*

All accuracy calculations were done for the 25 validations points. For accuracy data that were distributed normally, mean and standard deviation are included (bold text). For nonparametrically distributed data, median, and the interquartile range are provided. Precision was calculated on seven presentations of the central marker. For the star, head-restrained calibration outliers were removed using the Tukey method