Skip to main content
. 2024 May 1;629(8010):174–183. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06877-w

Extended Data Fig. 12. Assessment of immune responses to endurance training.

Extended Data Fig. 12

a) Heatmap of the number and percent of KEGG and Reactome immune pathways significantly enriched by training-regulated features at 8 weeks. b) Line plots of standardized abundances of training-differential proteins in white adipose tissue up-regulated only in males at 8 weeks. Black line shows average across all features. c) Boxplots of the sample-level Pearson correlation between markers of immune cell types, lymphatic tissue, or cell proliferation and the average value of features in (b) at the protein level. Center line represents median; box bounds represent 25th and 75th percentiles; whiskers represent minimum and maximum excluding outliers; filled dots represent outliers. A pink point indicates that the marker is also one of the differential features plotted in (b). # indicates when the distribution of Pearson correlations for a set of at least two markers is significantly different from 0 (two-sided one-sample t-test, 5% BY FDR). When only one marker is used to define a category on the y-axis, the gene name is provided in parentheses. d) Trajectories of mean absolute signal of various immune cell types in BAT or WAT-SC following deconvolution of bulk RNA-Seq with CIBERSORTx (error bars = SEM). e) Immune cell type enrichment analysis results of training-differentially expressed transcripts. Points represent significant enrichments (5% FDR, one-sided Mann-Whitney U test). f) Line plots showing the log2 fold-changes for Cxcr3 and Il1a transcripts in the small intestine (error bars = SEM).