Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 18;15:1373590. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1373590

Table 6.

Comparison of different LR configurations on the validation dataset and test dataset.

Configuration Precision
val | test
Recall
val | test
mAP50
val | test
mAP50-95
val | test
Default (YOLOv8s+Conv3) 0.899 | 0.931 0.846 | 0.829 0.904 | 0.906 0.674 | 0.694
Freeze–Non–Extra–Conv 0.266 | 0.299 0.308 | 0.352 0.226 | 0.272 0.110 | 0.136
Freeze–Back 0.560 | 0.566 0.363 | 0.461 0.417 | 0.511 0.216 | 0.280
Fast–Extra–Conv 0.883 | 0.906 0.687 | 0.765 0.811 | 0.839 0.545 | 0.603
Fast–Head 0.853 | 0.920 0.750 | 0.778 0.830 | 0.846 0.549 | 0.615
Fast–Head–Neck 0.938 | 0.955 0.830 | 0.837 0.895 | 0.905 0.659 | 0.688

Bold values signify the value of the best performing LR configuration under each metric.