Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 18;11:1353530. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1353530

Table 2.

Results of proximate analyses of marshmallow treatments expressed as means ± standard error.

Concentration (%) °Bloom Density (g/mL) Ash (%) pH °Brix
Honey Sugar
M1 0 100 265 0.43 ± 0.01 a 0.52 ± 0.002 bc 4.67 ± 0.07 b 60.33 ± 0.25 c
M2 50 50 265 0.42 ± 0.01 ab 0.57 ± 0.002 a 3.80 ± 0.08 c 61.00 ± 0.30 c
M3 75 25 265 0.40 ± 0.01 bc 0.56 ± 0.002 a 3.50 ± 0.08 d 65.50 ± 0.30 a
M4 0 100 300 0.44 ± 0.01 a 0.55 ± 0.002 ab 5.05 ± 0.08 a 60.00 ± 0.30 c
M5 50 50 300 0.38 ± 0.01 c 0.53 ± 0.002 abc 3.80 ± 0.08 c 60.00 ± 0.30 c
M6 75 25 300 0.35 ± 0.01 d 0.51 ± 0.002 bc 3.65 ± 0.08 cd 61.50 ± 0.30 b
M7 0 100 315 0.43 ± 0.01 a 0.49 ± 0.002 c 4.90 ± 0.08 ab 60.00 ± 0.30 c
M8 50 50 315 0.39 ± 0.01 c 0.44 ± 0.002 d 3.75 ± 0.08 cd 60.00 ± 0.30 c
M9 75 25 315 0.38 ± 0.01 c 0.43 ± 0.002 d 3.70 ± 0.12 c 60.00 ± 0.43 c

Means with the same letter indicate no significant difference based on Tukey’s test (α = 0.05).