Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 2;8(9):2094–2103. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011980

Table 2.

Multivariable regression analysis for EFS, OS, and RR

EFS
OS
Relapse risk end course 1
n HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value n HR (95% CI) P value
ITDFR 118 1 1 105 1
ITDINT 134 1.91 (1.30-2.78) .001 2.07 (1.3-3.31) .002 92 1.74 (1.07-2.84) .027
ITDPR 202 3.70 (2.61-5.24) <.001 3.48 (2.26-5.37) <.001 95 3.87 (2.44-6.14) <.001
LAR 166 1 1 112 1
HAR 288 1.25 (0.83-1.45) .097 1.29 (0.94-1.76) .117 180 1.17 (0.79-1.73) .431
Chemotherapy treatment 256 1 1 160 1
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin treatment 110 1.10 (0.83-1.45) .526 1.06 (0.77-1.47) .723 70 0.69 (0.44-1.10) .118
Sorafenib + HCT in CR1 (arm C AAML1031) 88 0.63 (0.43-0.93) .019 0.81 (0.52-1.26) .355 62 0.30 (0.15-0.61) .001
HCT in CR not received 291 1 1 163 1
HCT in CR received (TVC) 163 0.60 (0.43-0.83) .002 0.62 (0.44-0.87) .006 129 0.57 (0.37-0.90) .016

Multivariable regression analysis for EFS, OS, and RR according to cooccurring risk mutation group (FR, INT, PR), LAR (≤0.4) vs HAR (>0.4), treatment received, and HCT in CR as TVC.

Patients in the chemotherapy treatment group included patients on CCG2961, AAML0531 arm A, and AAML1031 arm A/B, patients in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin treatment group included patients treated on AAML03P1 and AAML0531 arm B, and patients in the sorafenib + HCT in CR1 group were those on AAML1031 arm C.

HR, hazard ratio; TVC, time-varying covariate.