Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 25;12:100565. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100565

Table 3.

Side-by-side comparison of cerebrospinal fluid leak conspicuity when using 2D versus 3D magnetic resonance myelography (n = 18).

Reader 1
Reader 2
Reader 3
n 2D Equal 3D 2D Equal 3D 2D Equal 3D
CSF leak conspicuity 18 0 4 14 0 3 15 0 3 15
Percentage 0 22 78 0 17 83 0 17 83

CSF cerebrospinal fluid