Table 3.
Side-by-side comparison of cerebrospinal fluid leak conspicuity when using 2D versus 3D magnetic resonance myelography (n = 18).
Reader 1 |
Reader 2 |
Reader 3 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | 2D | Equal | 3D | 2D | Equal | 3D | 2D | Equal | 3D | |
CSF leak conspicuity | 18 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
Percentage | 0 | 22 | 78 | 0 | 17 | 83 | 0 | 17 | 83 |
CSF cerebrospinal fluid