Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 3;68(5):e01698-23. doi: 10.1128/aac.01698-23

TABLE 4.

Microbiological outcomes of evaluable patients treated with SUL-DUR by SUL-DUR MIC of ABC baseline isolates in ATTACK

SUL-DUR MIC of baseline ABC (µg/mL)
Total, N (%) 0.5 1 2 4
All evaluable patients who received SUL-DURa
 Number of patients 87 5 28 43 11
  (Presumed) Eradication 63 (72%) 3 (60%) 19 (68%) 32 (75%) 9 (82%)
  (Presumed) Persistence 18 (21%) 2 (40%) 5 (18%) 10 (23%) 1 (9%)
  Indeterminate 6 (7%) 0 4 (14%) 1 (2%) 1 (9%)
Part A CRABC m-MITT
 Number of patientsb 61 4 22 28 7
  (Presumed) Eradication 42 (69%) 2 (50%) 14 (64%) 20 (71%) 6 (86%)
  (Presumed) Persistence 15 (24%) 2 (50%) 5 (23%) 8 (28%) 0
  Indeterminate 4 (6%) 0 3 (14%) 0 1 (14%)
Part B
 Number of patients 26 1 6 15 4
  (Presumed) Eradication 21 (81%) 1 (100%) 5 (83%) 12 (80%) 3 (75%)
  (Presumed) Persistence 3 (12%) 0 0 2 (13%) 1 (25%)
  Indeterminate 2 (7%) 0 1 (7%) 1 (7%) 0
a

Patients in the CRABC m-MITT with SUL-DUR MIC < 8 µg/mL.

b

The SUL-DUR arm in Part A CRABC m-MITT consisted of 61 patients for this analysis because the SUL-DUR MIC was not determined for two baseline ABC isolates that were not sent to the central laboratory. Presumed eradication = patient experienced clinical cure and there was no microbiological sample taken. Presumed persistence = patient experienced clinical failure and there was no microbiological sample taken. Sulbactam-durlobactam was tested as a titration of sulbactam in the presence of 4 µg/mL durlobactam.