Table 3.
Stepwise regression on factors that contributed to the likelihood to engage in Care Concierge follow up after assessment results.
| Outcome variable: engagement in Care Concierge follow up (n = 4,630) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Age | |||
| 19–34 | 1 | ||
| 35–44 | 0.91 | (0.67–1.22) | 0.517 |
| 45–54 | 1.47 | (1.11–1.94) | 0.006 |
| 55–64 | 1.74 | (1.28–2.36) | <0.001 |
| 65+ | 0.92 | (0.43–1.96) | 0.828 |
| Physically hurt | 0.78 | (0.56–1.10) | 0.155 |
| Financial crisis in the last 6 months | 0.76 | (0.59–0.97) | 0.030 |
| Have concerns on meeting daily needs such as food and shelter | 0.69 | (0.52–0.93) | 0.014 |
| Have concerns on meeting my monthly expenses such as car payments and insurance | 0.83 | (0.65–1.05) | 0.125 |
| Perceived stress score (PSS) | 1.11 | (1.06–1.16) | <0.001 |
| Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)-2 | 1.09 | (1.01–1.17) | 0.022 |
| PCL-C-2 score | 1.07 | (1.01–1.12) | 0.011 |
| Oslo social support scale (OSSS-3) | 0.95 | (0.91–0.99) | 0.026 |
| Tobacco use | 0.94 | (0.87–1.02) | 0.147 |
| Bodily pain in the past month | 0.87 | (0.80–0.95) | 0.002 |
A stepwise regression on follow-up consultations was done to address confounding variables (consent for Care Concierge contact and visits done after March 6th 2020). This table lists, the demographics, social determinants of health and screening surveys measured in the analysis.