Palmer 1998.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial Single‐centre study, UK Dates enrolled: June to July 1997 Follow‐up: 4 months |
|
Participants | 18 participants, number of men not given Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Age not given |
|
Interventions | Liberal transfusion threshold vs. restrictive transfusion threshold. Participants were randomised when their postoperative haemoglobin concentration dropped to between 8 and 10 g/dL within the first 2 days post operation Liberal transfusion threshold:
Restrictive transfusion threshold:
Number of participants randomised per intervention: 9/9 Number of participants included in the analysis of the primary outcome: not stated |
|
Outcomes | None reported ‐ authors contacted, none available | |
Notes | We tried to contact any of the authors of this conference abstract and received an email response in January 2013 from one of the authors explaining that this was a pilot trial and that the authors were unsuccessfully in obtaining a grant to finish the trial. The study was only presented as a conference abstract. There was a small overlap of trial participants (either 2 or 4) with Carson 1998 (McClelland 2009) This study was not included in the analysis of data due to a lack of data reported in the manuscript |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient data to assess low or high risk of bias |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient data to assess low or high risk of bias |
Blinding of participants (performance and detection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient data to assess low or high risk of bias |
Blinding of personnel (performance bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient data to assess low or high risk of bias |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient data to assess low or high risk of bias |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to assess as no outcome data reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to assess as no outcome data reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient data to assess low or high risk of bias |