Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cytotherapy. 2024 Feb 18;26(5):512–523. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.02.004

Table 2.

Accuracy of the calibration standard measurements of the IL-1RA ELISA

Standard sample
Nominal IL-1RA concentration [pg/ml]
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 Run valid?b
4000 (ULOQ) 2000 1000 500 250 125 (LLOQ) 62.5

Acceptance criteriona ≤ 25 ≤ 20 ≤ 20 ≤ 20 ≤ 20 ≤ 25 ≤ 25
Run 1 R1 2.8 1.0 2.2 1.9 1.1 1.1 2.7 Yes
R2 2.8 0.7 3.8 0.8 4.2 5.7 1.0
Run 2 R1 4.2 0.5 1.3 3.5 1.2 2.1 0.2 Yes
R2 4.2 0.3 3.1 1.4 1.5 4.0 4.7
Run 3 R1 1.2 0.2 3.6 0.1 31.7 15.3 39.9 No
R2 1.3 1.1 2.2 1.1 18.9 16.6 36.4
Run 3 (S1 – S6)c R1 1.2 0.0 3.0 0.3 26.2 28.1 n.a.c No
R2 1.3 1.0 1.6 0.7 14.4 29.3 n.a.c
Run 4 R1 0.4 1.2 5.1 15.9 0.4 4.5 10.1 Yes
R2 0.5 0.1 1.8 1.6 1.1 5.7 7.0
Run 5 R1 n.d.d 1.8 0.8 0.8 2.2 0.9 7.0 Yes
R2 n.d.d 1.8 0.7 1.2 2.0 3.4 2.8
Run 6 R1 3.3 2.5 1.3 5.7 5.7 0.9 18.5 Yes
R2 3.3 1.4 4.7 2.1 7.7 8.7 17.2

Accuracy is given as % bias of the back-calculated concentration from the nominal concentration. The back-calculated IL-1RA concentrations are given in supplementary Table 2.

a

as defined in the EMA’s and FDA’s guidelines on bioanalytical method validation [5154]; i.e., ≤ 20% (≤ 25% at the ULOQ and LLOQ). Values missing the acceptance criterion are highlighted in yellow.

b

According to the criteria defined in the EMA’s and FDA’s guidelines on bioanalytical method validation [5154]; i.e., ≥ 6 standard samples run at least in duplicate, with ≥ 75% of replicates per run and ≥ 50% of replicates per standard sample showing acceptable accuracy.

c

Since in Run 3 both replicates of S7 were above the maximum acceptable bias, a new calibration curve was generated without S7.

d

OD value was above the OD limit of the detector (“overflow”). n.a., not applicable; n.d., not determined; R, replicate;S, standard sample.