Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 19;4(2):161–174. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.12.006

Table II.

PEDro scores resulting from the quality assessment of the included studies.

Study Eligibility criteria Random allocation Concealed allocation Groups similar at baseline Blind subject Blind therapist Blind assessor Follow-up (<15% dropouts) Intention-to-treat analysis Between-group comparison Point measures and variability PEDro score Risk of bias
Akguller et al3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 8 L
Balci et al4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 4 H
Başkurt et al5 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5 H
Çelik13 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5 H
Hotta et al25 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 8 L
Mulligan et al49 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 5 H
Shah et al69 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 4 H
Turgut et al80 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 H

H, high; L, low; PEDro, Physiotherapy Evidence Database.