Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 12;27(5):109717. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109717

Table 1.

Mean marginal effects of bird traits related to population trends in urban and rural environments as obtained from Bayesian linear models

Urban Estimate 95% HDI PD % ROPE
Log(body mass) 0.187 0.077; 0.309 0.998 0.007
Habitat position −0.087 −0.198; 0.025 0.937 0.196
WetN 0.110 0.019; 0.200 0.992 0.070
WetY −0.250 −0.712; 0.160 0.871 0.073
Wetdiff 0.359 −0.075; 0.820 0.943 0.041

Rural

Log(body mass) 0.164 0.052; 0.276 0.998 0.009
Habitat position −0.010 −0.106; 0.096 0.584 0.464
WetN 0.066 −0.026; 0.157 0.925 0.207
WetY −0.100 −0.473; 0.275 0.700 0.117
Wetdiff 0.166 −0.233; 0.550 0.794 0.095

The range of the highest density interval (95% HDI), the probability of direction (PD) of an effect, and the percentage of the posterior distributions of the effects in ROPE (% ROPE; the region of practical equivalence) are shown. WetN represents species not associated with wetland habitats, WetY represents species occupying wetland habitats, and Wetdiff represents the difference between trends in WetN and WetY.