Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 26;9(5):103008. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103008

Table 2.

Systemic treatment choices in patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2− breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer, total and according to risk profile

Systemic treatment Total HR+/HER2− BC population (n = 87 455) Low-risk HR+/HER2− BC population (n = 44 078) Intermediate-risk HR+/HER2− BC population (n = 28 452) High-risk HR+/HER2− BC population (n = 11 285) Total TNBC population (n = 12 689)
Endocrine therapy, n (%) 55 439 (63) 16 577 (38) 25 681 (90) 10 584 (94) NA
 Neoadjuvant 2725 (3) 314 (1) 1418 (5) 599 (5) NA
 Adjuvant 55 300 (63) 16 535 (38) 25 615 (90) 10 568 (94) NA
Chemotherapy, n (%) 26 737 (31) 3130 (7) 13 343 (47) 8222 (73) 8809 (69)
 Neoadjuvant 9321 (11) 233 (1) 3770 (13) 3544 (31) 4445 (35)
 Adjuvant 17 900 (21) 2901 (7) 9711 (34) 4985 (44) 5298 (42)
Endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, n (%) 25 316 (29) 2960 (7) 12 620 (44) 7812 (69) NA
No systemic therapy, n (%) 30 593 (35) 27 329 (62) 2048 (7) 291 (3) 3836 (30)

HR+/HER2− BC, hormone receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer; NA, not applicable; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.