Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 30;12:e17355. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17355

Table 3. Comparison of species Microlaimus paraundulatus sp. n. with morphologically similar species (only males).

M. copulatus M. limnophilus M. porus M. zosterae * M. paraundulatus
Body length 320–330 401–470 380 618–621 439–457.5
a 18–20 22.8–29.3 21.1 27–29.4 27–30.5
b 4.1–4.6 5.6–6.5 4.9 6.7–7.2 5–6
c 6–7.2 7–8.8 5.4 9.4–9.9 8
c′ 3.2 3.2–4.1 5.1 3.6–3.9 4–5
Cephalic setae in relation to head diameter (%) 17% 23–25% 38% 20% 43%
amph% 40% 33–35% <50%** 43–45% 44%
Amph/hd 1.8 1.9 1.6 1.9 1.6
Length of spicule along arc in relation to cloacal body diameter 2.7–2.8 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.8–2.3
Length of gubernaculum in relation to length of spicule along arc (%) 30% 47% 42% 60% 48–56%
Precloacal supplements + + +
Cuticular pores +

Notes:

Information (measurements/proportions) of males of the species Microlaimus that concomitantly have cephalic setae <50% of head diameter; amphidial fovea between 1.6 and 1.9 times the head diameter; amphidial fovea <50% of the head body diameter.

The measurements are expressed in micrometers, or if noted, as a percentage or ratio. Present (+) or absent (−); a, b, c, c′ = de Man’s (1880) ratios; distance of amphidial fovea from anterior end in relation to head diameter (Amph/hd); percentage of the amphidial fovea diameter in relation to corresponding body diameter (amph%).

*

Based on the redescription of the species Microlaimus zosterae Allgén, 1930 provided by Kovalyev & Tchesunov (2005).

**

Proportion measured from the drawing of the female paratype. Missing information for the holotype male.