Skip to main content
. 2024 May 3;19(5):e0299705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299705

Table 2. Post-hoc analyses comparing pre training performance with training and post training performance per group for accuracy (acc), perceptual sensitivity (d’) and judgment tendency (c).

pre training vs. training pre training vs. post training training vs. post training
Group Variable z p ex p adj r BF z p ex p adj r BF z p ex p adj r BF
RBD acc 4.43 < .001 < .001 0.57 1881.14
(BF-0)
3.98 < .001 < .001 0.51 683.58
(BF-0)
2.91 .003 .008 0.38 0.02
(BF0+)
d’ 4.45 < .001 < .001 0.57 878.89
(BF-0)
4.00 < .001 < .001 0.52 358.25
(BF-0)
2.89 .003 .009 0.37 0.01
(BF0+)
c 4.43 < .001 < .001 0.57 1307.34
(BF+0)
3.08 .001 .004 0.40 39.99
(BF+0)
3.28 < .001 .002 0.42 0.01
(BF0-)
LBD acc 4.25 < .001 < .001 0.55 806.91
(BF-0)
3.63 < .001 < .001 0.47 422.54
(BF-0)
2.72 .005 .016 0.35 0.02
(BF0+)
d’ 3.88 < .001 < .001 0.50 472.36
(BF-0)
2.97 .002 .007 0.38 64.18
(BF-0)
2.52 .011 .032 0.33 0.07
(BF0+)
c 4.39 < .001 < .001 0.57 2810.42
(BF+0)
2.73 .005 .016 0.35 33.18
(BF+0)
2.21 .026 .079 0.29 0.17
(BF0-)

Note. padj = Bonferroni adjusted p-values.