Table 4. Mann-Whitney test results comparing difference scores of the three timepoints of measurement between RBD (a.) and LBD (b.) patient subgroups.
a. RBD | subgroup w/o vs. subgroup with visuo-spatial deficits | ||||||||||||||
training–pre training | post training–pre training | post training–training | |||||||||||||
Variable | U | p ex | p adj | r | BF 10 | U | p ex | p adj | r | BF 10 | U | p ex | p adj | r | BF 10 |
acc | 69.50 | .076 | .227 | 0.33 | 0.77 | 44.50 | .004 | .012 | 0.52 | 6.84 | 84.50 | .245 | .735 | 0.21 | 0.58 |
d’ | 69.00 | .074 | .223 | 0.33 | 0.81 | 51.50 | .010 | .031 | 0.46 | 4.62 | 100.00 | .624 | 1.00 | 0.09 | 0.42 |
c | 82.00 | .217 | .651 | 0.23 | 0.47 | 58.50 | .024 | .073 | 0.41 | 2.90 | 72.00 | .098 | .293 | 0.31 | 1.26 |
b. LBD | subgroup w/o vs. subgroup with motor-cognitive deficits | ||||||||||||||
training–pre training | post training–pre training | post training–training | |||||||||||||
Variable | U | p ex | p adj | r | BF 10 | U | p ex | p adj | r | BF 10 | U | p ex | p adj | r | BF 10 |
acc | 77.50 | .151 | .454 | 0.27 | 0.82 | 67.00 | .059 | .178 | 0.35 | 1.29 | 109.50 | .911 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.35 |
d’ | 76.00 | .137 | .411 | 0.28 | 0.91 | 70.00 | .081 | .244 | 0.32 | 0.91 | 107.00 | .838 | 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.36 |
c | 85.00 | .267 | .801 | 0.21 | 0.66 | 92.00 | .412 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.43 | 108.00 | .870 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.35 |
Note. padj = Bonferroni adjusted p-values.
Please note. Bayes factors BF10 reflect the support for the alternative hypothesis (difference between subgroups). A Bayes factor of BF10 < 1 provides support for the null hypothesis (no difference between groups).