Skip to main content
. 2024 May 3;19(5):e0299705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299705

Table 4. Mann-Whitney test results comparing difference scores of the three timepoints of measurement between RBD (a.) and LBD (b.) patient subgroups.

a. RBD subgroup w/o vs. subgroup with visuo-spatial deficits
training–pre training post training–pre training post training–training
Variable U p ex p adj r BF 10 U p ex p adj r BF 10 U p ex p adj r BF 10
acc 69.50 .076 .227 0.33 0.77 44.50 .004 .012 0.52 6.84 84.50 .245 .735 0.21 0.58
d’ 69.00 .074 .223 0.33 0.81 51.50 .010 .031 0.46 4.62 100.00 .624 1.00 0.09 0.42
c 82.00 .217 .651 0.23 0.47 58.50 .024 .073 0.41 2.90 72.00 .098 .293 0.31 1.26
b. LBD subgroup w/o vs. subgroup with motor-cognitive deficits
training–pre training post training–pre training post training–training
Variable U p ex p adj r BF 10 U p ex p adj r BF 10 U p ex p adj r BF 10
acc 77.50 .151 .454 0.27 0.82 67.00 .059 .178 0.35 1.29 109.50 .911 1.00 0.02 0.35
d’ 76.00 .137 .411 0.28 0.91 70.00 .081 .244 0.32 0.91 107.00 .838 1.00 0.04 0.36
c 85.00 .267 .801 0.21 0.66 92.00 .412 1.00 0.16 0.43 108.00 .870 1.00 0.03 0.35

Note. padj = Bonferroni adjusted p-values.

Please note. Bayes factors BF10 reflect the support for the alternative hypothesis (difference between subgroups). A Bayes factor of BF10 < 1 provides support for the null hypothesis (no difference between groups).