Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 19;23(5):619–626. doi: 10.1038/s41563-024-01806-2

Fig. 4. Flexure strain and anisotropy model.

Fig. 4

a,b, Non-uniform strain distribution, εxx, in the α-Fe2O3 layer as a function of thickness and length, across folds in buffered AFM membranes (type C) with α-Fe2O3-side-facing-up (a) and buffer-side-facing-up (b) configurations. Membrane thickness has been exaggerated to aid the visualization of the non-uniform strain distribution as a function of thickness. The neutral line (εxx ≈ 0), indicated in yellow, is located at very different positions in a and b relative to the middle of the α-Fe2O3 layer, resulting in strong variations in the average and maximum strains in the AFM layer. c,d, Evolution of the thickness-averaged strain in the α-Fe2O3 layer, 〈εxxz,F, and the corresponding local TM/TMFF for the two configurations given in a (c) and b (d). Strain-driven modulation of the local TM was obtained from the model developed in the literature30. Here TM/TMFF larger and smaller than unity refers to the elevation and suppression of the local Morin temperature, respectively, and therefore the magnetic anisotropy, relative to the flat far-field regions.