Table 4.

Comparison of volume changes in condyle with both erosion and pain based on various clinical factors.

Factors	dV	dV −	dV +
Use of oral appliances
Yes (38)	− 89.47 ± 159.83	134.93 ± 159.82	45.42 ± 40.32
No (7)	− 53.60 ± 97.16	93.54 ± 63.81	41.27 ± 32.01
P value	0.962	0.987	0.962
Stress
Yes (11)	− 51.61 ± 149.83	115.54 ± 118.98	61.59 ± 54.53
No (34)	− 97.06 ± 152.59	135.68 ± 158.05	39.74 ± 32.31
P value	0.275	0.931	0.404
Parafunctional habits
Yes (20)	− 137.14 ± 185.10	176.82 ± 195.14	41.13 ± 41.67
No (25)	− 39.29 ± 99.65	87.95 ± 81.55	47.78 ± 37.14
P value	0.040*	0.150	0.278
MOL
Yes (28)	− 91.19 ± 170.05	141.55 ± 163.86	49.38 ± 39.83
No (17)	− 71.97 ± 119.42	107.37 ± 123.50	37.41 ± 37.42
P value	0.673	0.656	0.406
Missing posterior teeth
Yes (2)	− 110.88 ± 49.19	135.32 ± 64.20	23.72 ± 13.19
No (43)	− 82.48 ± 154.59	128.01 ± 152.25	45.76 ± 39.44
P value	0.367	0.464	0.464
Change of occlusion
Yes (11)	− 161.33 ± 209.59	206.42 ± 219.42	45.04 ± 42.34
No (34)	− 82.48 ± 119.42	128.01 ± 110.07	45.76 ± 38.30
P value	0.140	0.107	0.989

MOL, mouth opening limitation.

Values are presented as mean and standard deviation.

*, p < 0.05 in Mann–Whitney test.