TABLE 3.
Summary of Mendelian randomization analysis results between Alzheimer’s disease and frailty.
| Exposure | Outcome | Method | # SNPs | b | se | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mendelian randomization between Alzheimer’s disease and frailty index | ||||||
| FI | AD | MR Egger | 15 | 1.73 | 1.08 | 0.13 |
| Weighted median | 15 | −0.11 | 0.20 | 0.59 | ||
| Inverse variance weighted | 15 | −0.13 | 0.15 | 0.37 | ||
| Simple mode | 15 | 0.23 | 0.36 | 0.53 | ||
| Weighted mode | 15 | 0.15 | 0.39 | 0.70 | ||
| AD | FI | MR Egger | 22 | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.33 |
| Weighted median | 22 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.35 | ||
| Inverse variance weighted | 22 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.32 | ||
| Simple mode | 22 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.89 | ||
| Weighted mode | 22 | −0.01 | 0.02 | 0.42 | ||
| Mendelian randomization between Alzheimer’s disease and frailty phenotype | ||||||
| FP | AD | MR Egger | 36 | 0.99 | 0.80 | 0.22 |
| Weighted median | 36 | −0.15 | 0.22 | 0.51 | ||
| Inverse variance weighted | 36 | −0.22 | 0.20 | 0.26 | ||
| Simple mode | 36 | −0.18 | 0.45 | 0.68 | ||
| Weighted mode | 36 | −0.22 | 0.40 | 0.59 | ||
| AD | FP | MR Egger | 27 | −0.01 | 0.37 | 0.97 |
| Weighted median | 27 | −0.03 | 0.02 | 0.12 | ||
| Inverse variance weighted | 27 | −0.03 | 0.02 | 0.09 | ||
| Simple mode | 27 | −0.03 | 0.31 | 0.93 | ||
| Weighted mode | 27 | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.38 | ||
AD: Alzheimer’s disease, FI: frailty index, FP: frailty phenotype, b: beta, se: standard error, p: p-value.