Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 4;16(4):e57580. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57580

Table 11. Correlations between GTV, GTV D50%, and GTV – 2 mm DV-0.01 in four specific dose prescriptions based on BED in 5 fractions.

The specific dose prescriptions followed the 5-fraction examples shown in Table 4

GTV: gross tumor volume; DX%: a minimum dose covering at least X% of a target volume; GTV – 2 mm: GTV evenly reduced by 2 mm; DV-0.01 cc: a minimum dose to cover a target volume minus 0.01 cc; BED: biologically effective dose; GTV + X mm: GTV evenly expanded by X mm; BED10: biologically effective dose based on the linear-quadratic model with an alpha/beta ratio of 10; vs: versus

Dose prescription GTV D50% (range, BED10) Spearman’s rho (vs GTV) (P value) GTV – 2 mm DV-0.01 cc (range, BED10) Spearman’s rho (vs GTV) (P value) Spearman’s rho (GTV D50% vs DV-0.01 cc) (P value)
GTV D98% 115.1-123.5 Gy 0.775 (P = 0.041 *) 108.2-134.4 Gy -1.000 -0.775 (P = 0.041 *)
GTV DV-0.01 cc 117.0-132.9 Gy 0.857 (P = 0.014 *) 116.5-136.5 Gy -1.000 -0.857 (P = 0.014 *)
GTV + 1 mm D95% 95.8-108.0 Gy -0.964 (P < 0.001 ***) 88.3-124.3 Gy -1.000 0.964 (P < 0.001 ***)
GTV + 2 mm D95% 82.3-98.6 Gy -0.847 (P = 0.016 *) 59.5-73.0 Gy -0.964 (P < 0.001 ***) 0.883 (P = 0.009 **)