Table 2.
Student feedback qualitative results
| Number of statements identified, n | Illustrative quotes | |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Themes | ||
| Praise for the technology | 29 | “Having the examiner’s perspective was important, so being able to see what they saw, and you know, being able to also see what they were looking for from their perspective.” |
| The device’s role as an adjunct for teaching | 28 |
“Very helpful, especially for larger groups of students when not feasible to go to bedside.” “very beneficial to use … if a situation like COVID-19 happened, where we couldn’t attend placement.” |
| Favourable outlook on the session design | 12 | “That’s one place that the HoloLens does better than the bedside teaching. You bring [the diagrams] up and see it, rather than on bedside teaching recall it off memory or have to go back on your phone.” |
| Negative Themes | ||
| Comments on the design of the session | 29 | “It would be good to have a go at some of the practical things like measuring a thyromental distance but otherwise was a good tutorial.” |
| Technical problems encountered | 25 |
“The video playback was choppy.” “I had some issues with hearing the patient responses.” |
| Potential barriers to student learning | 12 |
“Not as useful as bedside teaching.” “Does not substitute hands on time.” |