TABLE 3.
Unstandardized beta coefficients and standard errors for a taxonomy of linear models to predict mean RJA in 173 infants
| Outcome: Infant Mean RJA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model A | Model B | Model C | Model D | Model E | |
| Infant Age | 0.16*** (0.03) | 0.16*** (0.03) | 0.16*** (0.03) | 0.17*** (0.03) | 0.16*** (0.02) |
| Infant Receptive Language | 0.007* (0.003) | 0.008** (0.003) | 0.007* (0.003) | 0.008* (0.003) | 0.008* (0.003) |
| FPL | 0.0006** (0.0002) | 0.0005 (0.0003) | 0.0005 (0.0003) | ||
| Parent Education: some college | 0.32+ (0.16) | 0.29 (0.20) | 0.28 (0.16) | ||
| Parent Education: 2-yr degree | 0.34+ (0.20) | 0.14 (0.20) | 0.27 (0.20) | ||
| Parent Education: 4-year degree or graduate school | 0.40* (0.16) | 0.26 (0.16) | 0.14 (0.20) | ||
| Parent depressive and anxiety symptoms | −0.05 (0.03) | ||||
| Constant | 0.60+ (0.31) | 0.46 (0.31) | 0.36 (0.32) | 0.31 (0.32) | 0.34 (0.30) |
| R 2 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.36 |
| Δ R 2 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.07 | |
| χ2 | 3.95* | 1.47 | 1.29 | 1.41 | |
Note:: Parent education was included in the models as a factor with high school as the reference group. FPL was included as a continuous variable. Log likelihood test (χ2) compares each model to Model A.
p < .10,
p < .05,
p < .01,
p < .001.