Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 18;17(3):551–557. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.03.18

Table 3. The comparison of the characteristics, OCT variables, and visual outcomes between MH with type 1 and type 2 closure.

Parameters Type 1 closure (n=13) Type 2 closure (n=4) P
Preop. aperture diameter, µm 739±153 (611, 1180) 775±188 (670, 1060) 0.745
Preop. base diameter, µm 1430±445 (678, 2220) 1310±321 (1050, 1700) 0.583
Axial length, mm 24.4±1.04 (23.3, 26.5) 25.5±1.63 (23.1, 26.5) 0.267
Duration of symptom, y 0.78±0.76 (0.08, 2.00) 2.54±4.33 (0.08, 9.00) 0.477
Spherical equivalent, D -1.23±2.01 (-5.00, 0) -4.13±2.77 (-5.75, 0) 0.124
Ellipsoid zone defect, µm 1070±496 (315, 1700) 1160±748 (524, 1960) 0.825
Preop. VA, logMAR 0.90 (0.20) 1.28 (0.43) 0.014a
Postop. VA, logMAR 0.70 (0.20) 0.90 (0.20) 0.030a
Gain in VA, logMAR -0.20±0.12 (-0.45, 0) -0.38±0.38 (-0.70, 0) 0.726

aP<0.05 based on Mann-Whitney U test. MH: Macular hole; VA: Visual acuity. Continuous variables are expressed as mean±standard deviation or median (interquartile range).