Skip to main content
The Eurasian Journal of Medicine logoLink to The Eurasian Journal of Medicine
. 2023 Dec 1;55(Suppl 1):S165–S169. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.23393

Effect of Bacteriocins on the Intestinal Microbiota

Selin Dogan 1, Taha Yasin Koc 1,, Mehmet Karadayi 2
PMCID: PMC11074934  PMID: 39128034

Abstract

Intestinal microbiota, which plays an important role in human health by interacting with each other or with its hosts, is affected by many endogenous and exogenous factors. Any change in the composition and functionality of the intestinal microbiota, both in number and diversity, causes disruption of intestinal functioning and paves the way for many diseases. In this regard, many antimicrobial peptides, especially bacteriocins, synthesized by lactic acid bacteria are thought to be natural resources with a high potential for the protection of the intestinal microbiota and the treatment of intestinal diseases. Both the intestinal microbiota itself and many foodborne bacteria produce bacteriocins that can inhibit pathogenic microorganisms that cause serious health problems and regulate the intestinal microbiota. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the intestinal microbiota, the properties of lactic acid bacteria, their bacteriocins, and the effects of bacteriocins on the human health.

Keywords: Antimicrobial peptides, bacteriocin, intestinal microbiota, lactic acid bacteria

Introduction

Microbiota is a complex ecosystem formed by microorganisms living in the human body. These microorganisms are located in various parts of the body, from the intestines to the skin, from the stomach to the urogenital system. This community, consisting of different prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, archaea, protozoa, and even viruses, is called microbiota. It is estimated that 10% of the human body consists of its own cells and 90% of microbial cells of the microbiota. These microorganisms constantly interact with the host through direct contact or bacterial products and metabolites. Interactions in this context are pivotal for both human health and disease.1-5

Microbiota has special functions in different parts of the body, taking names such as intestinal microbiota, skin microbiota, stomach microbiota. The microbiota formed by the combination of microorganisms of the body is called “an unforgotten organ.” This dynamic ecosystem in the human body plays an important role in maintaining health and the development of many diseases. The human body microbiota works together with somatic cells to create a complex balance and is an effective control point on health. Therefore, a balanced microbiota is very important to maintain overall health.4,6

Containing over 10 trillion microbes, the human gut microbiota stands as the largest microbiota in the human body. This microbiota contains a unique and complex microbial community that interacts with its host. Here, trillions of bacteria, viruses, and other microorganisms work in harmony with body systems, creating a healthy balance. The gut microbiota performs a number of critical tasks, from digestive processes to nutrient absorption, from immune system functions to energy metabolism. The interaction of these microbes forms the basis of human health and is in constant dialogue with the body’s host. This dynamic ecosystem plays a key role in the development and maintenance of healthy human physiology. Having the correct balance of intestinal microbiota is considered the key to a healthy life.2,5,7,8

From birth to death, the human gut microbiota is widely acknowledged to persist, undergoing influence from internal and external factors like diet, medications, the host immune system, and the microbiota itself in diverse ways. The intestinal microbiota begins to form in the womb during the prenatal period and continues with colonization from birth until the age of 3. In addition, different bacterial groups may be dominant in the intestinal microbiota of individuals at all ages.5,9

Disruption of the normal microbial homeostasis of the intestine can lead to a number of metabolic disorders and diseases, such as infection, inflammatory disorders and chronic malignancies. Microbial communities adapt, rearrange, and evolve as a result of these interactions. Dietary interventions designed to modulate or maintain host microbiota balance are attracting increasing attention. These interventions to manipulate intestinal commensal bacteria aim to maintain a healthy microbial balance or regenerate a disturbed balance. Hence, interventions targeting the gut microbiota may emerge as significant contributors to future advancements in areas like metabolic health, immune system functions, and disease prevention.2,5,8,10-12

The female parent and the external environment are 2 important basic factors for the healthy development and transmission of the human intestinal microbiota. Recent studies show that the mother’s intestinal microflora, the environmental conditions during birth, the skin and fecal microbiota content of the mother and baby, the baby’s breastfeeding status after birth and the content of breast milk, and the microorganisms in the mouth and surrounding areas are very effective in the healthy development of the intestinal microbiota.13-15

Commonly encountered microorganisms, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have the capacity to colonize the intestine and seamlessly integrate into the host’s physiological metabolism. Playing a critical role in the intestinal microbiota, LAB produce a range of metabolites including organic acids, amino acids, vitamins, exopolysaccharides, and bacteriocins.5 Additionally, the metabolites produced by LAB have profound effects on host health. Colonized by a myriad of intestinal microorganisms, the intestine exhibits significant species diversity. LAB metabolites provide resistance against pathogens while helping to maintain the intestinal epithelial barrier. They can also influence host nutrition, metabolism, and behavior by regulating immune responses. The significance of LAB metabolites lies in their ability to uphold the balance and stability of the intestinal microbiota, owing to these properties.16-21

Ribosomally synthesized peptides, bacteriocins produced by LAB, possess distinct antibacterial activity of their own. These natural peptides arise in the competitive environment between microorganisms and have evolved specifically to provide a competitive advantage among bacterial cells. These small molecules play an important defensive role, especially in combating bacterial infections, and function to maintain balance in the microbial ecosystem.22,23

Although the effects of bacteriocins on animal intestinal microorganisms are well established, their impact on the human microbiota and health is not fully understood. In previous studies, in vitro fermentation systems were commonly employed to ferment feces and bacteriocins together, allowing for the investigation of bacteriocins’ in vitro effects on the intestinal microbiota. However, beyond these studies, more information is needed about the complex microbiota interactions of bacteriocins within the human body and their possible therapeutic applications. In this context, future research will help us understand and evaluate the potential effects of bacteriocins on human health.24,25

This review will delve into the significance of the intestinal microbiota, LAB, their produced metabolites, and the impacts of bacteriocins on the intestinal microbiota.

Lactic Acid Bacteria

Defined by Orlo-Jensen in 1919, LAB are typically rod- or cocci-shaped, gram-positive, microorganisms. They are characterized by being catalase and nitrate reductase negative, not forming spores, and generally producing lactic acid as the end product during carbohydrate fermentation.26,27 Catalase negativity, inability to form spores, inactivity and anaerobism are characteristic of LAB. However, while some species may show catalase activity in environments high in heme (the oxygen-carrying element of hemoglobin), such as blood and gelose, it is known that some streptococcus strains can live in an aerobic environment, and some lactobacilli form endospores and show motility.28-30 Lactic acid bacteria, which are heterotrophic microorganisms, continue their lives by using substances created by other cells. Nutritional requirements are very high. They need relatively more complex carbon sources to carry out their bioactivities. For this reason, they use complex organic molecules as carbon sources. Many free amino acid molecules, organic acids and sugars are needed for LAB to growth.28,29,31,32

Many of the important properties of LAB are encoded in plasmids. Plasmids are circular-shaped extrachromosomal DNA molecules that carry the genetic information of the cell and are not linked to chromosomal DNA. They are located in the cytoplasm and can proliferate and act independently of bacterial DNA. Plasmids do not contain the genetic materials necessary for bacteria to maintain their vital activities. On the other hand, they provide many features that make them medically important, such as producing antimicrobial substances and resistance to antibiotics.33-35

Microorganisms like LAB have the capability to produce a range of metabolites, encompassing amino acids, organic acids, vitamins, exopolysaccharides (EPS), and bacteriocins. Underlying the regulatory function of LAB, these metabolites exert profound effects on the health of the host. These various metabolites produced by LAB perform critical tasks such as maintaining the balance in the intestinal microbiota, regulating immune system functions and creating resistance against pathogens. Therefore, metabolite production of LAB underlies the healthy interaction between the microbiota and the host organism. In recent years, the primary focus of LAB research has been on its probiotic effects, its influence on the health of the host and the intestinal microbiota.20,36,37

Bacteriocins

Bacteriocins are 2-10 kDa antimicrobial peptides in protein structure that show bacteriocidal activity against the same genetically closely related species in a narrow spectrum or against the same genera in a broad spectrum.26,38,39,40 Apart from their antimicrobial properties, the significance of bacteriocins in food safety has increased, given their susceptibility to gastric secretions and digestion in the human body due to their peptide or protein structures. The gene cluster encoding bacteriocins in many cases contains one or more immune proteins to prevent self-killing. These immune proteins prevent the adsorption of bacteriocins to the membrane and ensure that the adsorbed bacteriocins are sent back to the external environment or are destroyed by taking the bacteriocin into the cell. Bacteriocins are frequently mistaken for antibiotics due to their analogous properties., due to the fact that bacteriocins are primary metabolites and have narrow-spectrum effects, they have become more preferred in foods.41,42

Bacteriocins, which are antimicrobial compounds synthesized ribosomally from microorganisms, are basically divided into 3 groups: gram negative, gram positive, and archaea. Colicin, the first identified bacteriocin, was obtained from E.coli, a gram-negative bacterium. Although gram-negative bacteriocins include many defined bacteriocin types, their use in industrial applications is limited due to their heat instability and narrow spectrum of effects. Halocin obtained from Halobacteria and archaeocin obtained from Archaea are examples of bacteriocins produced from the most well-known Archaea, but whose usage potential is quite limited.

Bacteriocins produced by gram-positive bacteria, the majority of which are LAB, have a slightly wider spectrum and, due to these properties, they are potential cultures for medical and industrial applications. In addition, since gram-positive LAB have GRAS status, the studies conducted and the products to be obtained have high potential for use in the food industry.42-44

Bacteriocins can be essentially categorized into 2 main groups: class I, which includes commonly studied bacteriocins such as lanthionine and β-methylanthionine, called lantibiotics, and class II bacteriocins, which include modified nonthermostable bacteriocins with a molecular weight greater than 10 kDa.42,43

Since bacteriocins are in protein structure, they are synthesized from genetic codes carried by the ribosomes of the producer microorganisms, usually on plasmids or through mobile cell elements called transposons. Although the mechanisms of action vary depending on the type, they commonly include changes in membrane permeability, cell wall synthesis deficiencies, and pore formation that will cause death in the target cell.42,43

Bacteriocin research has long focused specifically on the use of these substances as food preservatives or antibiotic alternatives. Nevertheless, these substances are regarded as natural regulators of the human microbiome, as many members of the human microbiome produce bacteriocins to compete effectively in an environment with limited resources. This is a reason why bacteriocins have attracted significant attention as potential microbiome regulators.8,23,45

In terms of structure, mechanism of action, and inhibition spectrum, bacteriocins exhibit significant diversity.46-48 Hence, the complete understanding of the unforeseen impacts of bacteriocin production on the overall structure and function of intricate microbial communities is still elusive. To assess the potential use of bacteriocins as precise tools for microbiome regulation, there is a requirement for more conclusive and replicable evidence. However, the complexity and diversity among individuals limit studies on the human microbiome.49

Bacteriocins Produced by Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Effects on Intestinal Microbiota

A promising feature of LAB is the production of bacteriocins, an important molecule. In recent years, bacteriocins produced by LAB have attracted great attention because most of the bacteriocin producers in this group of bacteria are probiotics. Commonly present in our foods, particularly in fermented products, these microorganisms are generally deemed safe for human consumption. The gastrointestinal tract serves as another common habitat for LAB, where they establish intricate molecular communication tools with both the host and other bacteria.50,51

Bacteriocins are often considered weapons with various inhibition spectra against other bacteria that share the same environment. While the majority of bacteriocins focus on species or genera closely related to their producers, some may exhibit much broader spectra. Some LAB can increase target diversity and compensate for the relatively narrow spectrum of bacteriocins by producing multiple bacteriocins belonging to different classes.52-54

Bacteriocins present in the intestine can promote the survival and colonization of the producer while inhibiting closely related competitive strains or pathogens (Figure 1). They can also influence the host’s immune system through their effects on gut microbial populations. Central to gut microbiota research has been the focus on the antagonistic activity of bacteriocin producers against different pathogenic or antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains in the gut.53-55

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Regulatory mechanism of intestinal microbiota by LAB and their bacteriocins.20

Various LAB bacteriocins or LAB capable of producing bacteriocins have demonstrated the ability to inhibit pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes. Additionally, bacteriocin producers such as Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile, and even Salmonella enteritidis have been reported to eliminate multidrug- or vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Therefore, it is thought that bacteriocin production may make an important contribution to beneficial activities in the intestine.54,56-58

Examining the relevant literature reveals that numerous studies concentrate on assessing the impacts of bacteriocin-producing LAB or bacteriocins on the regular intestinal microbiota in live animals. For example, Riboulett and team (2012) showed that Ligilactobacillus salivarius UCC118, which produces the bacteriocin Abp118, caused significant but mild changes in mouse and pig intestinal microbiota.59 Kwok et al (2015) suggested that Lactobacillus plantarum P-8, a probiotic strain, causes a change in the fecal bacterial profile in humans and that this change is due to the production of plantaricin, a bacteriocin produced by this strain.60 Another study suggested that nisin F had a stabilizing effect on bacterial populations in the intestines of mice.61 These studies demonstrate the effects of bacteriocins on the gut microbiota; however, they vary widely in factors such as application methods, the model used, and the use of appropriate negative controls. Attributing the observed changes to either the bacteriocin or the bacteriocin producer, and drawing a general inference, becomes challenging due to these factors.54

Conclusion

Today, advances in molecular techniques have led to significant advances in human microbiota research. It is thought that these studies allow us to understand the mechanisms of many diseases and develop more specific and effective treatment methods. For this reason, it is anticipated that interest in research in the field of microbiota will rapidly increase and become widespread. To prevent potential diseases or manage existing ones, safeguarding the health of our microbiota is crucial against threats posed by environmental pollution, malnutrition, and other external factors.

Lactic acid bacteria produce a variety of metabolites, especially bacteriocins, and these metabolites form the basis of the regulatory function of LAB, profoundly affecting host health. Many studies have revealed that LAB and bacteriocins have significant effects on host health. The basis of these effects is the regulatory effects of LAB and bacteriocins on the intestinal microbiota. LAB, through itself and its metabolites, can directly or indirectly maintain the stability and homeostasis of the intestinal microbiota; This affects intestinal cells and determines host health. This regulation ensures that the intestinal system maintains its health and strengthens its resistance to pathogens. However, the fact that the intestinal microbiota and the mechanism of action of bacteriocins are not fully understood causes us to have limited knowledge about the effects of bacteriocins on the intestinal microbiota and increases the importance of every study to be conducted in this field.

Funding Statement

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

Footnotes

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions: Concept – M.K.; Design – S.D.; Data Collection and/or Processing – S.D, T.K.; Analysis and/or Interpretation – M.K.; Literature Review – S.D, T.K.; Writing – S.D; Critical Review – M.K.

Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  • 1. O’Hara AM, Shanahan F. The gut flora as a forgotten organ. EMBO Rep. 2006;7(7):688 693. ( 10.1038/sj.embor.7400731) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Aslam H, Green J, Jacka FN, et al. Fermented foods, the gut and mental health: a mechanistic overview with implications for Fermente gıdalar ve sağlık depression and anxiety. Nutr Neurosci. 2020;1:13. ( 10.1080/1028415X.2018) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kim S, Covington A, Pamer EG. The intestinal microbiota: antibiotics, colonization resistance, and enteric pathogens. Immunol Rev. 2017;279(1):90 105. ( 10.1111/imr.12563) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Stedman A, Brunner K, Nigro G. Decrypting the communication between microbes and the intestinal mucosa—A brief review on Pathogénie Microbienne Moléculaire’s latest research. Cell Microbiol. 2019;21(11):e13118. ( 10.1111/cmi.13118) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Teng Y, Yang X, Li G, Zhu Y, Zhang Z. Habitats show more impacts than host species in shaping gut microbiota of sympatric rodent species in a fragmented forest. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:811990. ( 10.3389/fmicb.2022.811990) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bektaş M. Gut microbiota and accumulation of heavy metals: a new study of water scorpions (Hemiptera: Nepidae). Pol J Environ Stud. 2022;31(5):4019 4028. ( 10.15244/pjoes/147590) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mojsak P, Rey-Stolle F, Parfieniuk E, Kretowski A, Ciborowski M. The role of gut microbiota (GM) and GM-related metabolites in diabetes and obesity. A review of analytical methods used to measure GM-related metabolites in fecal samples with a focus on metabolites’ derivatization step. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020;191:113617. ( 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113617) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Heilbronner S, Krismer B, Brötz-Oesterhelt H, Peschel A. The microbiome-shaping roles of bacteriocins. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(11):726 739. ( 10.1038/s41579-021-00569-w) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Drider D. Gut microbiota is an important source of bacteriocins and their in situ expression can be explored for treatment of bacterial infections. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2021;13(6):1759 1765. ( 10.1007/s12602-021-09843-y) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ghaısas S, Maher J, Kanthasamy A. Gut microbiome in health and disease: linking the microbiome–gut–brain axis and environmental factors in the pathogenesis of systemic and neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;158:52 62. ( 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.11.012) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Carvalho N, Costa EM, Silva S, Pimentel L, Fernandes TH, Pintado ME. Fermented foods and beverages in human diet and their influence on gut microbiota and health. Fermentation. 2018;4(4):90. ( 10.3390/fermentation4040090) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Oktay BA, Özbaş ZY. Fermente Gıdaların İnsan sağlığı üzerindeki etkileri. Gıda. 2020;45(6):1215 1226. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Güney R, Çınar N. Anne sütü ve mikrobiyota gelişimi. J Biotechnol Strateg Health Res. 2017;1:17 24. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ersöz AB, Gülerman F. Otizm spektrum Bozukluğunda bağırsak Mikrobiyatasının rolü. Türk Psikiyatr Derg. 2019;30(3):210 219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Karatay E. Mikrobiyota, prebiyotik ve probiyotikler. Anadolu Güncel Tıp Derg. 2019;1(3):68 71. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Scott KP, Gratz SW, Sheridan PO, Flint HJ, Duncan SH. The influence of diet on the gut microbiota. Pharmacol Res. 2013;69(1):52 60. ( 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.10.020) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Caggianiello G, Kleerebezem M, Spano G. Exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria: from health-promoting benefits to stress tolerance mechanisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(9):3877 3886. ( 10.1007/s00253-016-7471-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Şanlier N, Gökcen BB, Sezgin AC. Health benefits of fermented foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(3):506 527. ( 10.1080/10408398.2017.1383355) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Liang L, Liu L, Zhou W, et al. Gut microbiota-derived butyrate regulates gut mucus barrier repair by activating the macrophage/WNT/ERK signaling pathway. Clin Sci (Lond). 2022;136(4):291 307. ( 10.1042/CS20210778) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Tang H, Huang W, Yao YF. The metabolites of lactic acid bacteria: classification, biosynthesis and modulation of gut microbiota. Microb Cell. 2023;10(3):49 62. ( 10.15698/mic2023.03.792) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Yilmaz E, Gul M. Effects of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) essential oil and chronic heat stress on growth performance, carcass characteristics, serum biochemistry, antioxidant enzyme activity, and intestinal microbiology in broiler chickens. Vet Res Commun. 2023;47(2):861 875. ( 10.1007/s11259-022-10048-z) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Cavera VL, Arthur TD, Kashtanov D, Chikindas ML. Bacteriocins and their position in the next wave of conventional antibiotics. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;46(5):494 501. ( 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.07.011) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Dıcks LMT, Dreyer L, Smith C, van Staden AD. A review: the fate of bacteriocins in the human gastro-intestinal tract: do they cross the gut–blood barrier? Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2297. ( 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02297) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Casadei G, Grilli E, Piva A. Pediocin A modulates intestinal microflora metabolism in swine in vitro intestinal fermentations. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(6):2020 2028. ( 10.2527/jas.2008-1438) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Pu J, Hang S, Liu M, et al. A class IIb bacteriocin plantaricin NC8 modulates gut microbiota of different enterotypes in vitro. Front Nutr. 2022;9:877 948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ozlü H, Atasever M. Bacteriocinogenic bacteria isolated from Civil, Kashar and White cheeses in Erzurum, Turkey. Ank Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2019;66(2).147 153 [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Akbulut S, Baltaci MO, Adiguzel G, Adiguzel A. Identification and potential biotechnological characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from White cheese samples. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2022;16(4):2912 2922. ( 10.22207/JPAM.16.4.66) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Fernandes A, Jobby R. Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria and their potential clinical applications. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2022;194(10):4377 4399. ( 10.1007/s12010-022-03870-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Sharma P, Yadav M. Enhancing antibacterial properties of bacteriocins using combination therapy. J App Biol Biotech. 2022;11(1):232 243. ( 10.7324/JABB.2023.110206) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sallan S, Yılmaz Oral ZF, Kaya M. A review on the role of lactic acid bacteria in the formation and reduction of volatile nitrosamines in fermented sausages. Foods. 2023;12(4):702. ( 10.3390/foods12040702) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Uymaz B, Şanlıbaba P. Gıdalardaki Biyokoruyucu: Nisin (E234). Turk J Agric Food Sci Technol. 2015;3(12):908 915. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Teneva-Angelova T, Hristova I, Pavlov A, Beshkova D. Lactic acid bacteria—from nature through food to health. In: Advances in Biotechnology for Food Industry, Chapter 4; 2018:91 133. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Hayaloğlu AA, Özer B. Peynir Biliminin Temelleri. Sidas ; Medya; Ltd; İzmir,2011:643. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Cui Y, Zhang C, Wang Y, et al. Class IIa bacteriocins: diversity and new developments. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(12):16668 16707. ( 10.3390/ijms131216668) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Sağlam H, Karahan AG. Plasmid stability of potential probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strains in artificial gastric juice, at elevated temperature, and in the presence of novobiocin and acriflavine. Arch Microbiol. 2021;203(1):183 191. ( 10.1007/s00203-020-02017-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Agriopoulou S, Stamatelopoulou E, Sachadyn-Król M, Varzakas T. Lactic acid bacteria as antibacterial agents to extend the shelf life of fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables: quality and safety aspects. Microorganisms. 2020;8(6):952. ( 10.3390/microorganisms8060952) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Bartkiene E, Lele V, Sakiene V, et al. Fermented, ultrasonicated, and dehydrated bovine colostrum: changes in antimicrobial properties and immunoglobulin content. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(2):1315 1323. ( 10.3168/jds.2019-16357) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kurt Ş, Zorba Ö. Bakteriyosinler ve gıdalarda kullanım olanakları. Yüzüncü Yıl Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2005;16(1):77 83. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Demir E. Fermente Süt Ürünlerinden Izole Edilen Laktik Asit Bakterilerinde Bakteriyosin Üretiminin Karakterizasyonu (Master’s thesis). Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Aydın , 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Soran GŞ, Çelik Ş. Telemesi haşlanan geleneksel peynirlerimizin üretimine uygun doğal starter kültür geliştirilmesi. Harran Univ Mühendislik Derg. 2018;3(1):15 19. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Cleveland J, Montville TJ, Nes IF, Chikindas ML. Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001;71(1):1 20. ( 10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00560-8) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Güllüce M, Karadayı M, Barış Ö. Bacteriocins: promising natural antimicrobials. Local Environ. 2013;3(6): 1016- 1027. [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Işik C. Lactobacillus plantarum S54ün Bakteriyosini Olan Plantarisin Geninin Ekspresyon Profillerinde Çevre Koşullarına ve Gıda Patojenlerine Bağlı Olarak Meydana Gelen Değişimlerin Araştırılması , Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum ; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Chhetri V, Prakitchaiwattana C, Settachaimongkon S. A potential protective culture; halophilic Bacillus isolates with bacteriocin encoding gene against Staphylococcus aureus in salt added foods. Food Control. 2019;104:292 299. ( 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.04.043) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Bäuerl C, Umu ÖCO, Hernandez PE, Diep DB, Pérez-Martínez G. A method to assess bacteriocin effects on the gut microbiota of mice. J Vis Exp. 2017;(125):56053. ( 10.3791/56053) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Guinane CM, Cotter PD. Role of the gut microbiota in health and chronic gastrointestinal disease: understanding a hidden metabolic organ. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2013;6(4):295 308. ( 10.1177/1756283X13482996) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Baquero F, Lanza VF, Baquero MR, Del Campo R, Bravo-Vázquez DA. Microcins in Enterobacteriaceae: peptide antimicrobials in the eco-active intestinal chemosphere. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2261. ( 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02261) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Bitschar K, Sauer B, Focken J, et al. Lugdunin amplifies innate immune responses in the skin in synergy with host- and microbiota-derived factors. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2730. ( 10.1038/s41467-019-10646-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Colombo NS, Perez-Ibarreche M, Draper LA, et al. Impact of bacteriocin-producing strains on bacterial community composition in a simplified human intestinal microbiota. Front Microbiol. 2023;14. ( 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1290697) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Nes IF, Yoon S-S, Diep DB. Ribosomally synthesiszed antimicrobial peptides (bacteriocins) in lactic acid bacteria: a review. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2007;16:675 690. [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Pessione E. Lactic acid bacteria contribution to gut microbiota complexity: lights and shadows. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:86. ( 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00086) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Eijsink VGH, Axelsson L, Diep DB, Håvarstein LS, Holo H, Nes IF. Production of class II bacteriocins by lactic acid bacteria; an example of biological warfare and communication. Antonie Leeuwenhoek Int J Gen Mol Microbiol. 2002;81(1-4):639 654. ( 10.1023/a:1020582211262) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Dobson A, Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C. Bacteriocin production: a probiotic trait? Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(1):1 6. ( 10.1128/AEM.05576-11) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Umu ÖCO, Rudi K, Diep DB. Modulation of the gut microbiota by prebiotic fibres and bacteriocins. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2017;28(1):1348886. ( 10.1080/16512235.2017.1348886) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Millette M, Cornut G, Dupont C, Shareck F, Archambault D, Lacroix M. Capacity of human nisin- and pediocin-producing lactic acid bacteria to reduce intestinal colonization by vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(7):1997 2003. ( 10.1128/AEM.02150-07) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Walsh MC, Gardiner GE, Hart OM, et al. Predominance of a bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus salivarius component of a five-strain probiotic in the porcine ileum and effects on host immune phenotype. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008;64(2):317 327. ( 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00454.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Dabour N, Zihler A, Kheadr E, Lacroix C, Fliss I. In vivo study on the effectiveness of pediocin PA-1 and Pediococcus acidilactici UL5 at inhibiting Listeria monocytogenes. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;133(3):225 233. ( 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.05.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Klu YAK, Chen J. Influence of probiotics, included in peanut butter, on the fate of selected Salmonella and Listeria strains under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;120(4):1052 1060. ( 10.1111/jam.13084) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Riboulet-Bisson E, Sturme MHJ, Jeffery IB, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus salivarius bacteriocin ABP118 on the mouse and pig intestinal microbiota. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31113. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0031113) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Kwok LY, Guo Z, Zhang J, et al. The impact of oral consumption of Lactobacillus plantarum P-8 on faecal bacteria revealed by Pyrosequencing. Benef Microbes. 2015;6(4):405 413. ( 10.3920/BM2014.0063) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. van Staden DA, Brand AM, Endo A, et al. Intraperitoneally injected, may have a stabilizing effect on the bacterial population in the gastro-intestinal tract, as determined in a preliminary study with mice as model. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2011;53:518 524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Eurasian Journal of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Ataturk University School of Medicine

RESOURCES