Table 1.
iSR’obot™ MonaLisa (Biobot Surgical, Singapore) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author, Year | Type of Study | N | Design of the Study | Cancer Detection Rate | Complication Rate |
Trotsenko et al 202314 | Prospective | 157 | Primary results | – | – |
Walter et al 202224 | Prospective | 228 | Primary results | – | 14% |
Wetterauer et al 202133 | Prospective | 118 | Systematic Versus Targeted Biopsy | 1 core: 39.1% 2 cores: 52.2% 3 cores: 67.4% |
– |
Yang et al 202025 | Prospective | 30 | Primary results | 63.3% (all) 50.0% (csPca) |
6.7% 1 urosepsis 1 Aur |
Lee et al 202017 | Retrospective | 433 | Systematic Versus Targeted Biopsy | %57 %46 (csPca) |
– |
Patel et al 202018 | Retrospective, multicentre | 92 | COG-TB Versus Targeted Biopsy | 60.4% (all) 39.6% (csPca) |
Aur 1.9% Haematuria 7.5% Perineal bruising 8% |
Miah et al 201912 | Prospective | 86 | Primary results | 51.2% (all) | 1 urosepsis |
Mischinger et al 201834 | Prospective | 232 | Primary results | 61% (all) 45.3% (csPca) |
3% 1 rectal injury/peritonitis 6 Aur 3 Perineal bruising |
Kaufmann et al 201820 | Prospective | 73 | Robotic TP, In‐bore and COG-TB | 52.4% (all) 35.6% (csPca) |
– |
Chen et al 201716 | Prospective | 19 | Combination MRI-targeted and transperineal template biopsy | 73.7% (all) 15.8% (csPca) |
– |
Kaufmann et al 201728 | Prospective | 55 | Primary results | 61.8 (all) 52.7% (csPca) |
Aur 5.4% Major bleeding 1.8% Minor bleeding 9.1% |
Kroenig et al 201627 | Retrospective | 52 | Primary results | 59.6% (all) 51.9% (csPca) |
2 patients (temporary bleeding and a rectum perforation) |
Artemis™ (Eigen, USA) | |||||
Author, Year | Type of Study | N | Design of the Study | Cancer Detection Rate | Complication Rate |
Claros et al 202019 | Prospective | 269 | Cognitive microUSG Versus Robotic Tp | 23% (csPca) | – |
AUR, acute urinary retention; COG-TB, cognitive targeted biopsy; csPca, clinically significant prostate cancer; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; TP, transperineal; USG, ultrasonography.