Table 7.
References | Specific limitation | Specific future perspective |
---|---|---|
Monajatipoor et al (2022) | Data annotation; visual encoder choices; evaluation scope | Larger annotated datasets; visual encoder flexibility; diverse medical imaging tasks |
Wang et al (2023b) | Non-human-like language generation; limited prompts; impact of LLM Size | Language model refinement; exploration of more complex information; investigation of vision classifiers; quantitative analysis of prompt design; engagement with clinical professionals |
Yan et al (2023a) | Potential biases; accuracy of concept scores | Improved language models; robustness enhancements; reducing model dependency; biased data mitigation |
Patrício et al (2023) | Interpretable concept | Expanding to other imaging modalities; enhanced interpretability |