Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 15;46:e-rbgo15. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024AO15

Table 2. Characterization and agreement analysis between the methods regarding the BI-RADS® classification of breast lesions and regarding the echographic descriptors of the lesions submitted to biopsy, with data from both researchers.

P1 n(%) K P2 n(%) K
ABUS HHUS ABUS HHUS
BI-RADS®
Benign 9(33,3) 9(33,3) 0,92* 13(48,1) 11(40,7) 0,70*
Suspect 18(66,7) 18(66,7) 14(51,9) 16(59,3)
Echogenicity
Hypoechoic 10(41,7) 9(37,5) 0,90** 10(41,7) 11(45,8) 0,87**
Isoechoic 0(0,0) 0(0,0) 1(4,2) 0(0,0)
Heterogeneous 8(33,3) 9(37,5) 8(33,3) 8(33,3)
> 1 pattern 3(12,5) 3(12,5) 1(4,2) 1(4,2)
Solid-cystic 3(12,5) 3(12,5) 4(16,7) 4(16,7)
Form
Oval 14(58,3) 13(54,2) 0,92** 14(58,3) 13(54,2) 0,79**
Round 0(0,0) 0(0,0) 1(4,2) 0(0,0)
Irregular 10(41,7) 11(45,8) 9(37,5) 11(45,8)
Orientation
Parallel 23(95,8) 22(91,7) 0,75* 24(100,0) 22(91,7) 0,71*
Not parallel 1(4,2) 2(8,3) 0(0,0) 2(8,3)
Margins
Circumscribed 16(66,7) 16(66,7) 0,95** 15(62,5) 15(62,5) 0,98**
Indistinct 4(16,7) 4(16,7) 5(20,8) 4(16,7)
Angled 0(0,0) 1(4,2) 0(0,0) 2(8,3)
Microlobulated 1(4,2) 1(4,2) 2(8,3) 1(4,2)
Spiked 3(12,5) 2(8,3) 2(8,3) 2(8,3)
Rear acoustics
Absent 19(79,2) 18(75,0) 0,91** 19(79,2) 18(75,0) 0,92**
Acoustic reinforcement 0(0,0) 1(4,2) 0(0,0) 1(4,2)
Shadow 5(20,8) 5(20,8) 5 (20,8) 5(20,8)
*

Kappa;

**

Kendall's Tau-b; n - absolute frequency; % - relative Frequency; ABUS - automated breast ultrasound; HHUS - hand held ultrasound; P1 - researcher 1; P2 - researcher 2