Table 2.

Multivariate evaluation of the six dimensions and rank of the included literature.

Study ID	Publication year	Design type	AMSTAR-2 scale	PRISMA scale	Publication bias	Homogeneity	Average rank score
Sun et al. (31)	2021 (5)	RCT (17)	6 (4)	18 (9)	None (10)	Low (9)	9.00
Yin et al. (32)	2023 (17)	RCT (17)	10 (14)	22 (16)	Bgger’ s and Egger’ s tests (17)	High (17)	16.33
Liu et al. (33)	2021 (5)	RCT (17)	5 (3)	12 (1)	None (10)	High (17)	8.83
Zhu et al. (34)	2021 (5)	RCT (17)	8 (10)	17 (7)	Funnel plot (17)	Low (9)	10.83
Wang and Han (35)	2022 (7)	RCT (17)	7 (9)	16.5 (3)	Funnel plot (17)	High (17)	11.67
Han et al. (36)	2023 (17)	RCT (17)	10 (14)	20.5 (13)	None (10)	Low (9)	13.33
Li et al. (37)	2023 (17)	RCT (17)	9 (11)	20 (12)	Funnel plot (17)	High (17)	15.17
Xie et al. (38)	2023 (17)	RCT (17)	11 (17)	25.5 (17)	Bgger’ s and Egger’ s tests (17)	High (17)	17.00
Chen et al. (39)	2023 (17)	RCT (17)	7 (9)	20 (12)	None (10)	High (17)	13.67
Gao et al. (40)	2023 (17)	RCT (17)	10 (14)	21 (14)	None (10)	High (17)	14.83
Xu et al. (41)	2022 (7)	RCT (17)	6.5 (5)	17 (7)	Funnel plot (17)	Low (9)	10.33
Liu et al. (42)	2021 (5)	RCT (17)	5 (3)	17 (7)	None (10)	Low (9)	8.50
Gong et al. (43)	2023 (17)	RCT (17)	7 (9)	20 (12)	None (10)	High (17)	13.67
Li et al. (44)	2023 (17)	RCT (17)	5 (3)	16.5 (3)	None (10)	Low (9)	9.83
Tian et al. (45)	2023 (17)	RCT (17)	7 (9)	22 (16)	Funnel plot (17)	Low (9)	14.17
Hara et al. (46)	2021 (5)	RCT (17)	11 (17)	17 (7)	None (10)	Low (9)	10.83
Chen et al. (47)	2023 (17)	RCT (17)	11 (17)	18 (9)	None (10)	Low (9)	13.17
Average score of evaluation entries	12.29	17	9.88	9.71	12.88	12.76	12.42

“None” means not stated or not used in the text; numbers in parentheses represent the rank order of each document in the total literature.