Table 4. Comparison of analysis results.
Diffraction index | Pipeline | Overall | Low | High |
---|---|---|---|---|
High resolution limit | xia2(dials) | 1.47 | 4.00 | 1.47 |
Spark-dials | 1.47 | 4.00 | 1.47 | |
Low resolution limit | xia2(dials) | 54.15 | 54.18 | 1.50 |
Spark-dials | 150.84 | 151.63 | 1.50 | |
Completeness | xia2(dials) | 83.6 | 100.0 | 10.3 |
Spark-dials | 83.7 | 100.0 | 9.3 | |
Multiplicity | xia2(dials) | 9.3 | 12.1 | 1.2 |
Spark-dials | 9.2 | 11.9 | 1.2 | |
I/sigma | xia2(dials) | 9.2 | 30.4 | 0.2 |
Spark-dials | 9.5 | 28.6 | 0.3 | |
Rmerge(I) | xia2(dials) | 0.124 | 0.082 | 0.660 |
Spark-dials | 0.123 | 0.094 | 0.536 | |
Rmerge(I+/−) | xia2(dials) | 0.121 | 0.081 | 0.456 |
Spark-dials | 0.121 | 0.093 | 0.410 | |
Rmeas(I) | xia2(dials) | 0.129 | 0.085 | 0.892 |
Spark-dials | 0.129 | 0.098 | 0.735 | |
Rmeas(I+/−) | xia2(dials) | 0.131 | 0.087 | 0.640 |
Spark-dials | 0.131 | 0.101 | 0.579 | |
Rpim(I) | xia2(dials) | 0.037 | 0.024 | 0.595 |
Spark-dials | 0.037 | 0.028 | 0.500 | |
Rpim(I+/−) | xia2(dials) | 0.050 | 0.032 | 0.450 |
Spark-dials | 0.050 | 0.038 | 0.410 | |
CC half | xia2(dials) | 0.997 | 0.996 | 0.422 |
Spark-dials | 0.995 | 0.996 | 0.518 | |
Anomalous completeness | xia2(dials) | 77.1 | 100.0 | 0.8 |
Spark-dials | 77.2 | 100.0 | 0.7 | |
Anomalous multiplicity | xia2(dials) | 5.1 | 7.2 | 1.1 |
Spark-dials | 5.1 | 7.1 | 1.1 | |
Anomalous correlation | xia2(dials) | −0.363 | −0.448 | 0.000 |
Spark-dials | −0.437 | −0.621 | 0.000 | |
Anomalous slope | xia2(dials) | 0.471 | ||
Spark-dials | 0.513 | |||
dF/F | xia2(dials) | 0.071 | ||
Spark-dials | 0.065 | |||
dI/s(dI) | xia2(dials) | 0.538 | ||
Spark-dials | 0.509 | |||
Total observations | xia2(dials) | 345680 | 30482 | 269 |
Spark-dials | 342370 | 30028 | 245 | |
Total unique | xia2(dials) | 37358 | 2514 | 224 |
Spark-dials | 37316 | 2516 | 203 |