Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 May 7;19(5):e0285635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285635

Researching COVID to enhance recovery (RECOVER) pediatric study protocol: Rationale, objectives and design

Rachel S Gross 1,*,#, Tanayott Thaweethai 2,#, Erika B Rosenzweig 3, James Chan 2, Lori B Chibnik 2, Mine S Cicek 4, Amy J Elliott 5, Valerie J Flaherman 6, Andrea S Foulkes 2, Margot Gage Witvliet 7, Richard Gallagher 8, Maria Laura Gennaro 9, Terry L Jernigan 10,11, Elizabeth W Karlson 12, Stuart D Katz 13, Patricia A Kinser 14, Lawrence C Kleinman 15, Michelle F Lamendola-Essel 13, Joshua D Milner 16, Sindhu Mohandas 17, Praveen C Mudumbi 18, Jane W Newburger 19, Kyung E Rhee 20, Amy L Salisbury 14, Jessica N Snowden 21, Cheryl R Stein 8, Melissa S Stockwell 22,23, Kelan G Tantisira 24, Moriah E Thomason 8, Dongngan T Truong 25, David Warburton 26, John C Wood 27, Shifa Ahmed 2, Almary Akerlundh 28, Akram N Alshawabkeh 29, Brett R Anderson 3, Judy L Aschner 30, Andrew M Atz 31, Robin L Aupperle 32, Fiona C Baker 33, Venkataraman Balaraman 34, Dithi Banerjee 35, Deanna M Barch 36, Arielle Baskin-Sommers 37, Sultana Bhuiyan 13, Marie-Abele C Bind 2, Amanda L Bogie 38, Tamara Bradford 39, Natalie C Buchbinder 40, Elliott Bueler 13, Hülya Bükülmez 41, B J Casey 42, Linda Chang 43, Maryanne Chrisant 44, Duncan B Clark 45, Rebecca G Clifton 46, Katharine N Clouser 30, Lesley Cottrell 47, Kelly Cowan 48, Viren D’Sa 49, Mirella Dapretto 50, Soham Dasgupta 51, Walter Dehority 52, Audrey Dionne 19, Kirsten B Dummer 53, Matthew D Elias 54, Shari Esquenazi-Karonika 13, Danielle N Evans 55, E Vincent S Faustino 56, Alexander G Fiks 57, Daniel Forsha 58, John J Foxe 59, Naomi P Friedman 60, Greta Fry 61, Sunanda Gaur 15, Dylan G Gee 37, Kevin M Gray 62, Stephanie Handler 63, Ashraf S Harahsheh 64, Keren Hasbani 65, Andrew C Heath 66, Camden Hebson 67, Mary M Heitzeg 68, Christina M Hester 69, Sophia Hill 13, Laura Hobart-Porter 70, Travis K F Hong 34, Carol R Horowitz 71, Daniel S Hsia 72, Matthew Huentelman 73, Kathy D Hummel 74, Katherine Irby 74, Joanna Jacobus 75, Vanessa L Jacoby 76, Pei-Ni Jone 77, David C Kaelber 78,79, Tyler J Kasmarcak 80, Matthew J Kluko 56, Jessica S Kosut 34, Angela R Laird 81, Jeremy Landeo-Gutierrez 82, Sean M Lang 83, Christine L Larson 84, Peter Paul C Lim 85, Krista M Lisdahl 84, Brian W McCrindle 86, Russell J McCulloh 87, Kimberly McHugh 80, Alan L Mendelsohn 88, Torri D Metz 89, Julie Miller 90, Elizabeth C Mitchell 91, Lerraughn M Morgan 92, Eva M Müller-Oehring 33, Erica R Nahin 13, Michael C Neale 93, Manette Ness-Cochinwala 15, Sheila M Nolan 94, Carlos R Oliveira 56, Onyekachukwu Osakwe 95, Matthew E Oster 96, R Mark Payne 97, Michael A Portman 98, Hengameh Raissy 99, Isabelle G Randall 13, Suchitra Rao 100, Harrison T Reeder 2, Johana M Rosas 13, Mark W Russell 101, Arash A Sabati 102, Yamuna Sanil 103, Alice I Sato 104, Michael S Schechter 105, Rangaraj Selvarangan 35, S Kristen Sexson Tejtel 106, Divya Shakti 95, Kavita Sharma 107, Lindsay M Squeglia 62, Shubika Srivastava 108, Michelle D Stevenson 109, Jacqueline Szmuszkovicz 110, Maria M Talavera-Barber 111, Ronald J Teufel II 31, Deepika Thacker 108, Felicia Trachtenberg 90, Mmekom M Udosen 18, Megan R Warner 28, Sara E Watson 109, Alan Werzberger 112, Jordan C Weyer 113, Marion J Wood 18, H Shonna Yin 114, William T Zempsky 115, Emily Zimmerman 116, Benard P Dreyer 1; on behalf of the RECOVER-Pediatric Consortium
Editor: Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi117
PMCID: PMC11075869  PMID: 38713673

Abstract

Importance

The prevalence, pathophysiology, and long-term outcomes of COVID-19 (post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 [PASC] or “Long COVID”) in children and young adults remain unknown. Studies must address the urgent need to define PASC, its mechanisms, and potential treatment targets in children and young adults.

Observations

We describe the protocol for the Pediatric Observational Cohort Study of the NIH’s REsearching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Initiative. RECOVER-Pediatrics is an observational meta-cohort study of caregiver-child pairs (birth through 17 years) and young adults (18 through 25 years), recruited from more than 100 sites across the US. This report focuses on two of four cohorts that comprise RECOVER-Pediatrics: 1) a de novo RECOVER prospective cohort of children and young adults with and without previous or current infection; and 2) an extant cohort derived from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study (n = 10,000). The de novo cohort incorporates three tiers of data collection: 1) remote baseline assessments (Tier 1, n = 6000); 2) longitudinal follow-up for up to 4 years (Tier 2, n = 6000); and 3) a subset of participants, primarily the most severely affected by PASC, who will undergo deep phenotyping to explore PASC pathophysiology (Tier 3, n = 600). Youth enrolled in the ABCD study participate in Tier 1. The pediatric protocol was developed as a collaborative partnership of investigators, patients, researchers, clinicians, community partners, and federal partners, intentionally promoting inclusivity and diversity. The protocol is adaptive to facilitate responses to emerging science.

Conclusions and relevance

RECOVER-Pediatrics seeks to characterize the clinical course, underlying mechanisms, and long-term effects of PASC from birth through 25 years old. RECOVER-Pediatrics is designed to elucidate the epidemiology, four-year clinical course, and sociodemographic correlates of pediatric PASC. The data and biosamples will allow examination of mechanistic hypotheses and biomarkers, thus providing insights into potential therapeutic interventions.

Clinical trials.gov identifier

Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT05172011.

Introduction

Long COVID, or the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), has been defined as symptoms, signs and conditions that continue or develop after a SARS-CoV-2 infection. These symptoms can affect people for weeks, months or even years after getting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [1, 2]. Symptoms can develop shortly after the initial recovery from an acute COVID-19 episode or persist from the initial illness. Symptoms may also emerge later or fluctuate or relapse over time. These symptoms can have debilitating effects on the daily health and quality of life of those affected.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted child health. Nearly 100 million people have been diagnosed with COVID-19 in the United States (US), with nearly 16 million children [3]. Although it is estimated that between 10% and 30% of adults experience persistent symptoms from COVID-19 [4], the prevalence in children is less well-established [5, 6]. As an emerging illness, the absence of universally-accepted PASC definitions in children challenge the elucidation of its epidemiology.

Unique challenges in understanding PASC symptoms in children have likely contributed to the limited evidence. For example, young children might not be able to articulate their symptoms. This has required studies to rely on caregiver interpretation of their young child’s symptoms. In addition, manifestation of symptoms may vary substantively across stages of physiological, emotional, and cognitive development [7]. As the medical community shifts from managing serious acute disease to addressing long-term consequences, large scale studies are needed to define PASC in children across the life course, to understand its natural history, and to develop evidence to guide successful treatment.

The pandemic began with a misconception that children were spared [8]. We now recognize that children and families are greatly impacted during both acute and chronic phases [912]. One distinct manifestation in children was recognized in April 2020; now called Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) [13]. This debilitating hyperinflammatory syndrome has impacted over 9,000 children and young adults in the US [14], and represents a distinct post-acute syndrome that is typically recognizable in clinical practice. Other more chronic manifestations of PASC are challenging to characterize and identify. Furthermore, children with PASC may present with different symptoms and greater mental health concerns than adults [3, 1521]. Additional phenotypes of childhood PASC are being reported, including phenotypes similar to postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), postintensive care unit syndrome, and potentially many others [2224]. Therefore, a compelling rationale exists to invest resources and effort to study PASC in children. The NIH’s REsearching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Initiative responded by bringing together researchers, communities, and families in a systematic study of PASC in children [25]. Evidence that leads to improved health trajectories of children with PASC, could have population-level health impacts for decades to come.

Study rationale

RECOVER has established the Pediatric Observational Cohort Study (RECOVER-Pediatrics), which is a combined retrospective and prospective longitudinal study, including four distinct cohorts, integrated together as a meta-cohort [25]. The overall goal is to characterize the clinical course, underlying mechanisms and long-term health effects of PASC on children and young adults from birth through 25 years old, to inform future pediatric preventive and treatment measures.

Study aims

RECOVER-Pediatrics scientific aims are to:

  1. Characterize the prevalence and incidence of new onset or worsening symptoms related to PASC

  2. Characterize the spectrum of clinical symptoms of PASC, including distinct phenotypes, and describe the clinical course and recovery.

  3. Identify risk and resiliency factors for developing PASC and recovering from PASC.

  4. Define the pathophysiology of PASC, including subclinical organ dysfunction, and identify biological mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of PASC.

Materials and methods

Overview of study design

RECOVER-Pediatrics is a longitudinal, observational meta-cohort study of children and young adults (ages birth through 25 years) and their caregivers, recruited from healthcare- and community-based settings in more than 100 sites throughout the US, including Puerto Rico. Those with and without a history of a SAR-CoV-2 infection are included. For those 17 years or younger, data are collected by caregiver report and child direct assessments, and for those 18 through 25 years old by self-report. The study is being conducted from March 2022 to March 2026.

The pediatric meta-cohort is comprised of four distinct cohorts: 1) de novo RECOVER prospective cohort including children and young adults ages birth through 25 years, with or without a known history of infection, and their caregivers; 2) Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) extant cohort, the largest long-term US study of brain development in adolescence [26, 27]; 3) In utero exposure cohort, including children less than 3 years old born to individuals with and without a SAR-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy [28, 29]; and 4) COVID MUSIC Study extant cohort (Long-Term Outcomes after the Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome In Children), including children and young adults with history of MIS-C [30]. This report focuses on the de novo cohort and ABCD (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Overview of RECOVER-Pediatrics (de novo and ABCD cohorts).

Fig 1

Fig 1 shows a tiered overview of 2 of the 4 cohorts included in the meta-cohort (de novo RECOVER prospective cohort and ABCD), their participation in the three study tiers, and their targeted sample sizes (see Study Participants). Children and young adults ages newborn through 25 years old will be enrolled in the meta-cohort at Tier 1 for the de novo RECOVER prospective cohort (more than 6,000 from birth through 25 years old, including those with and without history of infection), and from ABCD (up to 10,000 adolescents with and without history of infection). All children and young adults enrolled in the study complete a baseline assessment (Tier 1). Percentages shown indicate random sampling proportions. Children and young adults without history of infection are assigned at random with prespecified proportions to the acute and post-acute arms. All children and young adults with history of infection who enroll into the acute arm and those without a history of infection who are randomized to the acute arm are asked to complete assessments at 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Following a promotion algorithm, children and young adults in Tier 1 will be selected to be promoted to Tier 2, which includes assessments at 2–6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after enrollment. 600 children and young adults with history of infection, selected from Tier 2, will complete more intensive Tier 3 assessments at 12 and 24 months after enrollment.

*Children and young adults with history of infection who enroll in the post-acute arm (“post-acute infected”, n = 4,000) are stratified into High, Medium, and Low probability of PASC groups based on a combination of past Long COVID diagnoses, Tier 1 Global PROMIS health measures, and symptom survey screener responses. Then, 100% of the high probability group, 50% of the medium probability group, and 20% of the low probability group are promoted at random to Tier 2. In June 2023, the promotion rate for the medium probability group was increased to 100% to enhance promotion rates and include the wider spectrum of symptom severity within our longitudinal cohort. Since the distribution of these probability groups is unknown a priori, sample sizes are not specified for each category. Overall, the number of children and young adults who progress to Tier 2 will be less than the initial post-acute infected sample size, but the total target sample size for infected children and young adults in Tier 2 is 5,400.

** In order to achieve a sample of 5,400 children and young adults with history of infection in Tier 2 that is skewed towards those with greater likelihood of having PASC, additional children and young adults will be recruited from Long COVID clinics and subspecialty services to complete both Tier 1 and Tier 2 assessments.

RECOVER-Pediatrics is structured in a sequential fashion with three Tiers of data collection. Participants are enrolled initially into Tier 1, which consists of a broad screening of health using remote surveys and biospecimen collection. Participants may subsequently progress to Tier 2, which includes a detailed review of health collected longitudinally for up to four years, using a combination of remote surveys and in-person assessments of biological and psychosocial data. In order to achieve the sample size required for Tier 2 assessments, other study participants will be recruited who present with a high probability of having PASC, such as those directly recruited from a clinic that focuses on Long COVID or presenting with a physician diagnosis of PASC. These participants will receive Tier 1 assessments and progress directly to Tier 2. Finally, in Tier 3, a subset of children and young adults most severely affected by PASC will undergo deep phenotyping with more intensive assessments to study PASC pathophysiology.

RECOVER-Pediatrics Tier 1 assessments aim to characterize the prevalence and incidence of new onset or worsening of sustained COVID-related symptoms (aim 1) and to gain a comprehensive understanding of the impact of exposure to a SARS-CoV-2 infection on broad physical, behavioral and mental health (aim 2). Tier 2 facilitates studying the natural history of PASC symptoms and potential recovery over time (aim 2). Child, household, and caregiver factors gathered in Tier 1, such as social determinants of health and prior health conditions, will be assessed to determine how they increase the risk of or protect against specific clinical outcomes (aim 3). Finally, Tier 3 data investigates long-term effects on multiple organ systems and child development (aim 4). Additionally, integration of Tier 1 and Tier 2 data will allow investigation of COVID-disease exposures and experiences which may be responsible for the clinical patterns observed in Tier 3.

The pediatric protocol was designed through collaboration across key stakeholders, including patients, caregivers, researchers, clinicians, community partners, and federal partners, fostering a patient-centered approach and promoting inclusivity and diversity. The pediatric protocol is adaptive to facilitate the changes needed in light of emerging science and the evolving pandemic.

Study organizational structure and management

Study infrastructure includes four cores: 1) Clinical Science Core (CSC) at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, which oversees study sites and provides scientific leadership in collaboration with hub and site Principal Investigators; 2) Data Resource Core (DRC) at Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, which provides scientific and statistical leadership, and handles data management and storage; 3) PASC Biorepository Core (PBC) at Mayo Clinic, which manages biospecimens obtained; and 4) Administrative Coordinating Center (ACC) at RTI International, which provides operational and administrative support; collectively these form the Core Operations Group. The four cores are supported by oversight committees and pathobiology task forces provide content-specific input. RECOVER cohort studies are overseen by the National Community Engagement Group (NCEG) composed of patient and community representatives, a Steering Committee composed of site Principal Investigators and NIH program leadership, an Executive Committee composed of NIH Institute leadership, and an Observational Safety Monitoring Board composed of experts in longitudinal observational studies, epidemiology, bioethics, and biostatistics. RECOVER-Pediatrics includes 10 hubs that manage ~100 sites (S1 Table), located in more than 39 states, Washington DC and Puerto Rico. Awardees were selected through a process that included independent peer review in response to OTA-21-015B.

Ethics

The study was approved by the NYU Grossman School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB), which serves as the single IRB for the majority of the study sites. A few pre-existing networks use their own central IRBs through an exemption granted by the NIH (e.g., ABCD, MUSIC). Caregivers, for children 17 years old or younger, and young adult participants provide signed informed consent to participate.

Recruitment, consent, and screening strategies

The de novo RECOVER prospective cohort study is recruiting participants from healthcare- and community-based settings. Healthcare-based recruitment involves local media, text messaging, hospital websites, COVID registries, and partnerships with pediatric practices, nurse hotlines, or emergency departments. Community-based recruitment includes partnering with community health workers, school nurses, sports coaches, health fairs, and a mobile van to access rural communities. Participants can also join by self-referral through the RECOVER website, or in response to plain language and picture-based recruitment materials in both English and Spanish, which were developed with community input and using health literacy principles [31].

Eligible dyads complete an informed written consent process at enrollment for Tiers 1 and 2. The consent process may be conducted using telephone, a secure video conference platform approved for exchange of PHI, or in person (using either a signed written consent form or via electronic informed consent [e-consenting]). An assent process is being conducted for children between 7 years and 17 years old. The study team explains the assent document to the child and parent/legal guardian and answers all questions. Child understanding of the key elements of the assent document is assessed by the study team and parent/legal guardian. The child either signs the age-appropriate assent document or provides verbal assent (with documentation in the local records and the central REDcap). Young adults, aged 18 through 25 years old, sign their own informed consent. Tier 3 consent forms will only be completed when testing is offered. A standardized teach back method is implemented as needed to ensure understanding of the key aspects of participation before enrollment. Participants are reconsented if there are major changes to the study design or to anticipated risks.

In ABCD, 11,880 children aged 9–10 years old were recruited from community and school sites to participate in a 10-year study with the goal of understanding neurocognitive development during adolescence [26, 27, 32]. All ABCD participants are being contacted and offered enrollment into RECOVER-Pediatrics.

Eligibility criteria

Children and young adults from birth through 25 years old are eligible to be enrolled in the de novo cohort, regardless of history of SARS CoV-2 infection. Enrolled participants are then categorized as either “infected” or “uninfected”: Infected participants have history of suspected, probable, or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria [33], evidence of infection by serum antibody profile, or a history of MIS-C. Uninfected participants are those who self-report as having no history of a SARS-CoV-2 infection and who have never met WHO criteria; they have no evidence of a past asymptomatic infection in their medical history or evidence of past infection by serum antibody profile.

A primary caregiver, defined as an individual responsible for the enrolled child or young adult who resides in the same household, such as biological or nonbiological family member, is invited to enroll.

The primary exclusion criterion is any child or young adult with co-morbid illness with expected survival of less than 2 years. There is no limit to the number of children or young adults who can be enrolled from a single household. See supplemental tables for detailed eligibility criteria, definitions of analytic groups, and the World Health Organization Criteria (S2S4 Tables).

Study participants

Recruitment is striving for a diverse sample that generally represents the US population, and encourages participation from rural or medically underserved communities, non-English speaking participants, and non-hospitalized participants with an acute COVID-19 infection. Participants are compensated for completing assessments and reimbursed for excess travel.

At least 6,000 participants will be recruited into the de novo cohort (Fig 1). Children and young adults with history of infection are classified into one of two study arms (acute arm vs. post-acute arm), based on their history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and infection dates. The acute arm includes 800 children and young adults whose most recent SARS-CoV-2 infection was 30 days or less prior to enrollment. The post-acute arm includes 4,000 children and young adults whose most recent SARS-CoV-2 infection was greater than 30 days prior to enrollment. In the group without a history of infection, 1,200 children and young adults will be randomly assigned to follow either the acute (200, or 17%) or post-acute (1,000 or 83%) arm of the protocol. Additional children and young adults will be recruited from Long COVID clinics and other subspecialty services in order to achieve Tier 2 sample size targets (see Timing of Study Assessments).

Up to 10,000 participants will also be recruited from the ABCD cohort.

Timing of study assessments

The assessments for the de novo cohort consists of three tiers, which vary in timing, collection methods and intensity.

Tier 1 (baseline visit for all participants) includes a single visit that is completed either via self-administration (remote and electronic) or research staff-assisted collection (e.g., telephone, videoconference, or in-person).

Tier 2 (follow-up visits) includes five longitudinal in-person visits at 2 to 6-, 12-, 24-, 36- and 48-months post-enrollment. The children and young adults followed longitudinally in Tier 2 are selected based on a sampling scheme that prioritizes the acute arm as well as children and youth in the post-acute arm with a greater likelihood of having PASC. Promotion to Tier 2 occurs as follows: 1) All children/young adults in the acute arm with or without history of infection will be promoted; 2) children/young adults in the post-acute arm with a history of infection will be promoted at a rate dependent on their likelihood of PASC based on prior Long COVID diagnoses, Tier 1 PROMIS global health measure responses [3436], and symptoms screener survey responses [18, 37] (Table 1); and 3) 40% of children/young adults without known infection in the post-acute arm, selected at random, will be promoted. In addition to promoting children and young adults from Tier 1, children and young adults will also be recruited from Long COVID clinics and subspecialty services to achieve the target sample size in Tier 2 of 6,000. These children and young adults will complete both Tier 1 and Tier 2 assessments. See Table 2 for a full description of the promotion algorithm.

Table 1. Potential post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) symptoms being Assessed in RECOVER-Pediatrics*.

Major or Minor Classification** Symptoms being Assessed
General symptoms or problems
Major Fever
Feeling sleepy during the daya
Fussy or cranky (crying a lot)b
Low energy or not feeling strong enough to do thingsa
Feeling very tired all day longa
Feeling very tired after walkinga
Not wanting to eat (poor appetite)
Lost weight or gained less than expected
Lost height or grew less than expected
Minor Trouble sleeping
Hot and cold spells (feeling hot or cold for no reason)a
Sweating more than normal
Wanting to eat more than normal (increased appetite)
Wanting to drink liquids more than normal (increased thirst)
Gained weight more than expected
Symptoms or problems in the eyes, ears, nose, and throat
Major Light hurts your eyesa
Change in hearinga
Ringing in the earsa
Change in smella
Loss of smella
Throat hurts (sore throat)a
Loss of voice (sounding hoarse)
Problems swallowing
Change in how things tastec
Minor Eyes look red
Eyes are watery
Eyes are dry
Dark circles or color under the eyes
Trouble seeing or blurry visiona
Stuffy nose or runny nose
Very dry moutha
Problems with teeth or gums
Chapped lips
Symptoms or problems involving the heart and lungs
Major Dry cough
Wet cough (brings up mucus)
Barking cough
Trouble breathing (breathing too fast)
Pain when breathinga
Pain in the chestc
Feeling like your heart is beating really fast, racing, or pounding (called palpitations) when not doing exercisec
Feeling like your heart is beating really fast when doing exercisec
Fainting or feeling like you are going to faint (lightheaded) c
Trouble walkinga
Trouble climbing stairsa
Trouble runninga
Symptoms or problems involving the belly
Major Nausea (feeling like you are going to throw up)
Throwing up (vomiting)
Loose stool (diarrhea)
Pain with peeing (urination)a
Peeing more than normal (urination more than normal) a
Minor Stomach pains/crampsa
Trouble pooping/stooling (constipation)
Symptoms or problems involving the skin, hair, and nails
Major Skin rash
Changes or problems with nails
Changes or problems with hair
Color changes in your skin, such as red, white or purple
Color changes on the fingers or toes
Minor Itchiness of the skina
Symptoms or problems involving the bones and muscles
Major Muscle weakness
Pains in the joints (like the elbows, knees, ankles)a
Pain in the backa
Pain in the necka
Minor Sore muscles or pain in the musclesa
Body aches or pains
Symptoms or problems involving the brain and nerves
Major Headachec
Feeling dizzy (feeling like the room is spinning)c
Shakiness or tremorsc
Feeling tingling or ’pin-and-needles’ in the hands and feetc
Unable to move part of the body
Problems with remembering things (memory)a
Problems with focusing on things (concentration), sometimes called "brain fog" a
Problems with talking a
Symptoms or problems involving feelings or behavior
Major Feeling sad or depressedc
Feeling anxious or on edgec
Feeling a lot of fear when being away from parent or caregiverb
Feeling a lot of fear of specific things like spiders or being up highd
Feeling a lot of fear about being with other children or adultsd
Feeling fear of crowds or being in closed-in spacesc
Having a sudden intense feeling of fear, like a panic attacke
Refusing to go to schoolc
Seeing, hearing, or feeling that something is there when it is not (hallucinations)c
Being hyperactive or much more active than other childrena
Refusing to follow rules or doing what they are asked to doa
Serious breaking of rules like lying, stealing, starting fights, or bullyinga
Having repeating memories, dreams, thoughts, or worries after a traumatic eventa
Minor Having a lot of tantrumsb
Holding their breath for a long time when they are afraid or angryb
Having nightmares
Screaming in fear while asleep, sometimes called night terrorsb
Aggressive behavior like hitting, biting or kickingb
Rocking the body back and forth or head banging
Symptoms or problems involving periods
Minor Getting periods less often f
Getting periods more often f
Heavier periods f
Lighter periods f

* The following question is used to assess potential PASC symptoms in RECOVER-Pediatrics: “Did your child have any of these problems or symptoms lasting for more than 4 weeks that started or got worse since the COVID pandemic began in March 2020? These are problems or symptoms that kept happening without stopping or kept happening again and again for longer than 4 weeks.”

** Symptoms were classified as major or minor depending on their severity and presumed likelihood of being associated with a COVID-19 infection.

a Symptoms included for children 3 years or older.

b Symptom included for children 5 years or younger.

c Symptom included for children 6 years or older.

d Symptoms included for children 2 years or older.

e Symptoms included for children 12 years or older.

f Symptoms included for those who report having menses.

Table 2. Promotion algorithm used in the de novo RECOVER-Pediatrics cohort for selecting children and young adults for the longitudinal follow-up (Tier 2).

Type of participant Subgroup Subgroup criteria Promotion rate to Tier 2
Acute infected”: Children and young adults who reported having a COVID infection ≤30 days prior to enrollment All None 100%
“Post-acute infected”: Children and young adults who reported having a COVID infection
>30 days prior to enrollment
High probability of PASCa Any of the following:
  1. Prior diagnosis of Long COVID or MIS-C based on study site medical record review or referral by a health care provider

  2. Recruitment from a Long COVID clinic

  3. ≥1 fair/poor responses on the global health PROMIS scaleb and ≥1 major or minor symptom reportedc

  4. ≥1 good/fair/poor responses on the global health PROMIS scaleb and ≥ 1 major symptom reportedc

  5. ≥1 good/fair/poor responses on the global health PROMIS scaleb and ≥2 minor symptoms reportedc

100%
Medium probability of PASCa Any of the following:
  1. ≥1 good responses on the global health PROMIS scaleb and ≥1 major or minor symptom reportedc

  2. ≥1 very good/good/fair/poor responses on the global health PROMIS scaleb and ≥1 major symptom reportedc

  3. ≥1 very good/good/fair/poor responses on the global health PROMIS scaleb and ≥2 minor symptoms reportedc

50%
Low probability of PASCa Does not meet high or medium probability of PASC criteria 20%
Uninfected”: Children or Young adults without a known history of a COVID infection Acute arm At enrollment, 17% of the “uninfected” group were randomly assigned to participate in the acute arm of the study. 100%
Post-acute arm At enrollment, 83% of the “uninfected” group were randomly assigned to participare in the post-acute arm of the study. 40% of this group will be randomly assigned to participate in Tier 2 40%

a Responses to the PROMIS Global Health Scales and the presence of major and minor symptoms are used to categorize participants who are post-acute infected as high, medium, or low probability of PASC.

b The PROMIS Global Health Scales are self-reported or caregiver-reported measures of overall, physical, and mental health for young adults and children, respectively [3436]. The three questions from the caregiver-reported version that are used in the algorithm, include: 1) “In general, would you say your child’s health is?; 2) “In general, how would you rate your child’s physical health?”; and 3) “In general, how would you rate your child’s mental health, including mood and ability to think?” Responses include: Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, or Poor.

cA list of all major and minor symptoms, reported at the enrollment visit as part of the symptom screener, is provided in the Table 1 [18, 37]. Not all symptoms are asked of all participants, as many are age-specific (e.g., fewer symptoms assessed for younger children) and sex-specific (e.g., menses related symptoms).

Children and young adults in the acute arm with a history of infection will also complete remote assessments at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after their infection onset, with additional in-person assessments at 8 weeks. Children and young adults in the acute arm without history of infection will complete the same assessments, timed relative to their enrollment date. All ABCD youth are eligible to participate in RECOVER Tier 1, and can be referred to a de novo cohort site to participate in Tiers 2 and 3, if geographically feasible.

Tier 3 has the most clinically intensive assessments with longitudinal in-person visits for a subset at 12 and 24 months post-enrollment. Tier 3 will include 600 children and young adults with history of infection from Tier 2.

Main categories of data

Data collected for the de novo and ABCD cohorts are described below (Table 3).

Table 3. Summary of study assessments in the de novo RECOVER-Pediatrics cohorta.

BL 2 4 8 2 to 6 12 24 36 48
(weeks) (months)
Tier 1 and Tier 2 Assessments BL Acute phase Post-acute phase
Identity
Demographics
Child Birth History
Child Current Health Status
Special Health Care Needs Screener
PROMIS Global Health
First COVID Infection History
Current COVID Infection History
Weekly COVID Infection History
COVID Infection History (Follow-up)
Related Conditions (MIS-C, POTS)
COVID Testing History
COVID Family Infection
COVID Symptoms
COMPASS-31
COVID Vaccine History
COVID Health Consequences
Social Determinants of Health
Child Wellbeing
Tier 1 Biospecimen
Anthropometry & Vital Signs
Electrocardiogram
Spirometry
Pulse Oximetry
Tier 2 Acute Biospecimens
10 Minute Active Standing Test (Orthostatic BP)
Joint Flexibility (Beighton Scale)
Neurocognitive Development (e.g., NIH Toolbox)
Emotional/Mental Health
Post-Acute Tier 2 Biospecimens
Tier 3 Assessments
Echocardiogram
Cardiac MRI
Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs)
Lung Microbiome (Sputum Induction)
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
Abdominal Ultrasound
Brain MRI
Brain EEG
Neurocognitive Testing
Tier 3 Biospecimens

aBlue = Questionnaires; Red = Clinical Assessments; Yellow = Biospecimen Collection

Surveys include validated surveys with NIH common data elements, as available, informed by expert opinion (S5 Table). All are completed using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), with the child’s first name coded within surveys to personalize the experience and to clarify which child the questions refer to given caregivers can have multiple children enrolled. For youth 17 years or younger, the caregiver is the primary respondent. Participants 18 through 25 years old are the primary respondent. Surveys assess sociodemographic information [38], child birth history [39], special health care needs [3941], SARS-CoV-2 infection history, related conditions (e.g., MIS-C, POTS or other form of dysautonomia, and Long COVID diagnoses), COVID testing and vaccine history, COVID-related symptoms (both acute and long-term), COVID health consequences (e.g., diet [42], physical activity [42], sleep [42], screen time [42], schooling, parenting [43]) and social determinants of health (e.g., food insecurity [44], social support [45]). A list of potential Long COVID symptoms are assessed [18, 37] (Table 1), with respondents asked whether a specific problem or symptom is/was present for at least 4 weeks since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and, for respondents with a history of infection, if the symptoms started before or after their infection.

Clinical assessments are completed at in-person Tier 2 visits across overarching domains of physical growth, physical health, neurocognition, and neurobehavioral function (S6 Table). Physical health domains include anthropometrics, vital signs, an active standing test measuring orthostatic blood pressures [46, 47], joint flexibility tests [48], electrocardiograms, and spirometry. Neurocognitive and neurobehavioral assessments vary by age (Table 4). Neurocognitive domains include broad and specific measures of attention, memory, receptive and expressive language skills, reading, and sensory function [4953]. Neurobehavioral domains include a broad assessment of behavioral function including anxiety, mood, social interactions, aggression, sleep, self-regulatory behaviors, somatic complaints and attention concerns [5461]. Tier 3 assessments follow the same domains, but provide more in-depth measurements. The promotion algorithm for Tier 3 is still under development. Physical health domains of cardio-pulmonary function are assessed by echocardiogram, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, cardiac MRI, pulmonary function tests, and sputum induction. Gastrointestinal function is assessed using abdominal ultrasound, and neurological function is assessed using brain MRI, electroencephalogram, and measures of neurocognitive function and psychiatric symptoms. These assessments include higher level measurement of all cognitive domains (thinking, language processing, memory, attention, and executive functioning) [62], visual motor integration and speed [6365], and a psychiatric symptom battery [66].

Table 4. Neurocognitive, Neurobehavioral, Well-Being and mental health measures by age in Tiers 2 and 3 for the de novo RECOVER-Pediatrics cohort.

Study Tier Neurocognitive and Developmental Assessments Neurobehavioral, Well-Being and Mental Health Assessments
Infancy and Toddlerhood: Birth through 2 years old
Tier 2 Ages and Stages Questionnaire—3rd Edition (ASQ-3) [4951]
Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers Revised with Follow up (MCHAT-RF) [52]
Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional, 2nd Edition (ASQ:SE-2) [54]
Child Behavior Checklist [55]
Tier 3 N/A N/A
Preschool-Age: 3 years old through 5 years old
Tier 2 Ages and Stages Questionnaire—3rd Edition (ASQ-3) [4951]
NIH Toolbox Cognitive Measures [53]
Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional, 2nd Edition (ASQ:SE-2) [54]
Child Behavior Checklist [55]
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Parent Proxy Anger Scale [56]
PROMIS® Parent Proxy Psychological Stress Experiences Scale [57]
PROMIS® Parent Proxy Positive Affect Scale [58]
Tier 3 Cognitive: Woodcock Johnson Cognitive Battery subtests [62]
Language: Woodcock-Johnson Oral Language Battery subtests [62]
Verbal Memory: Woodcock Johnson subtests [62]
Visual Memory: Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning [63]
Visual-Motor Drawing: Beery Buktenica [64]
Visual Motor Speed: Purdue Pegboard [65]
Pre-Academics: Woodcock-Johnson Achievement Battery subtests [62]
Kiddie SADS computer completed by caregiver [66]
School-age and Adolescence: 6 years old through 17 years old
Tier 2 NIH Toolbox Cognitive Measures [53] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Parent Proxy Anger Scale [56]
PROMIS® Parent Proxy Psychological Stress Experiences Scale [57]
PROMIS® Parent Proxy Positive Affect Scale [58]
Revised Children’s Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-25) [59]
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Hyperactivity/Inattention and Conduct Problems Subscales) [60]
Tier 3 Cognitive: Woodcock Johnson Cognitive Battery subtests [62]
Language: Woodcock-Johnson Oral Language Battery subtests [62]
Verbal Memory: Woodcock Johnson subtests [62]
Visual Memory: Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning [63]
Visual-Motor Drawing: Beery Buktenica [64]
Visual Motor Speed: Purdue Pegboard [65]
Pre-Academics: Woodcock-Johnson Achievement Battery subtests [62]
Kiddie SADS computer completed by caregiver [66]
Young Adults: 18 years through 25 years old
Tier 2 NIH Toolbox Cognitive Measures [53] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Parent Proxy Anger Scale [56]
PROMIS® Parent Proxy Psychological Stress Experiences Scale [57]
Achenbach Adult Self Report [61]
Tier 3 Cognitive: Woodcock Johnson Cognitive Battery subtests [62]
Language: Woodcock-Johnson Oral Language Battery subtests [62]
Verbal Memory: Woodcock Johnson subtests [62]
Visual Memory: Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning [63]
Visual-Motor Drawing: Beery Buktenica [64]
Visual Motor Speed: Purdue Pegboard [65]
SADS Structured Psychiatric Interview [66]

Biospecimens are collected across all Tiers using kits designed specifically for each visit, timepoint, and participant age (Table 5; S6 Table). Tier 1 biospecimens consist of saliva and whole blood. Kits are shipped to homes for remote collection. Child and primary caregivers provide both saliva and blood; the other biological parent when available provides only saliva. Saliva is collected using Oragene devices (OGR-600) and banked for future DNA analysis. Whole blood is collected using a TASSO M20 device [67], which collects capillary blood using 4 volumetric sponges that each hold 17.5μL of blood (70 μL total). One sponge is used for SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid antibody testing and remaining sponges are banked for future use.

Table 5. Biospecimen collection and processing summary.

Participant Samples
Collected For
Collected Specimen Quantitya Biobanked Specimen Type Number of Aliquots Aliquot
Volume
Tier 1
 Pediatric Participant;
Primary Caregiver;
Additional Biologic Parent
OGR-600 –Saliva 1 x 2mL Saliva NA 2 mL
 Pediatric Participant;
Primary Caregiver
TASSO M20 –Capillary Blood 1 x 70 μL Blood 4 x volumetric sponges 17.5 μL
Tier 2 Acute
 All Age Groups over 24 months Oragene 600 –Saliva 1 x 2mL Saliva N/A 2 mL
 All Age Groups over 24 months Serum Separator Tube (SST)–Whole Bloodb 1 x 5mL Serum 5 500 μL
 All Age Groups over 24 months EDTA–Whole Bloodc 1 x 10mL
  • Plasma

  • White Blood Cells (WBCs)

  • Red Blood Cells (RBCs)

  • 13 x Plasma

  • 1 x WBC

  • 3 x RBCs

  • 5 x 200 μL Plasma (Rutgers)​

  • 8 x 500 μL Plasma (PBC)

  • WBC– 1 mL

  • RBCs– 1 mL

 Ages 6–25 yrs. Sodium Citrate Cell Preservation Tube (CPT)–Whole Bloodd 2 x 4 mL
  • Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs)

~3 x PBMCs (target cell count minimum 5 million cells/mL) 1 mL
Tier 2 Post Acute
 Ages 24mo -under 6 years (all post-acute visits) Serum Separator Tube (SST)–Whole Bloodb 1 x 5mL Serum 5
  • 500 μL

 Ages 6–25 yrs
(6 month visit only)
Serum Separator Tube (SST)–Whole Bloodb 2 x 5mL
Serum 3
  • 1 x 1 mL—ARUP

  • 1 x 2 mL—ARUP

  • 1 x 1.5 mL–PBC

  • 6 x 200 μL for Rutgers and/or

  • 3 x 500 μL for PBC

 Ages 6–9 yrs. Sodium Citrate Cell Preservation Tube (CPT)–Whole Bloodd 2 x 4 mL Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) 8 x PBMCs (target cell count minimum 5 million cells/mL) 1 mL
 Ages 10–25 yrs. Sodium Citrate Cell Preservation Tube (CPT)–Whole Bloodd 4 x 4 mL Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) 16 x PBMCs (target cell count minimum 5 million cells/mL) 1 mL
 All Age Groups
EXCEPT
6-month Post Acute visit
for age 6–9 yrs
EDTA–Whole Bloodc 1 x 10mL
  • Plasma

  • White Blood Cells (WBCs)

  • Red Blood Cells (RBCs)

  • 13 x Plasma

  • 1 x WBC

  • 3 x RBCs

  • 5 x 200μL Plasma (Rutgers)

  • 8 x 500μL Plasma (PBC)

  • WBC– 1mL

  • RBCs– 1 mL

Tier 3 e
 All Age Groups Serum Separator Tube (SST)–Whole Bloodb TBD
  • Serum

  • TBD

  • TBD

 All Age Groups EDTA–Whole Bloodc TBD
  • Plasma

  • White Blood Cells (WBCs)

  • Red Blood Cells (RBCs)

  • TBD

  • TBD

 All Age Groups Lithium Heparin–Whole Blood TBD
  • Plasma

  • TBD

  • TBD

 All Age Groups Red Top (No Additive)–Whole Blood TBD
  • Serum

  • TBD

  • TBD

 All Age Groups Other Biospecimens for Microbiome Analysis (e.g. sputum, swaps (skin, nasal, oral), urine, stool) TBD
  • Sputum

  • Swabs

  • Urine

  • Stool

  • TBD

  • TBD

aSample volumes are age dependent: (newborn to under 6 years: maximum draw of 2 mL per kg of body weight; 6 to under 10 years: 25 mL; greater than 10 years old: 38 mL)

bSST tube is collected and within 4 hours of collection the SST tube is centrifuged, serum is aliquoted and frozen locally at collection sites. Serum aliquots are batch shipped frozen on dry ice in monthly intervals and are banked for future research.

cThe EDTA tube is collected for all age groups and is processed for plasma, WBC, and RBC aliquots. A plasma aliquot is sent out for central testing. The other EDTA aliquot derivatives are frozen and banked for future research.

dThe CPT tubes are only collected for age groups 6–25 years. The CPT tubes are centrifuged at collection sites and sent on ice packs day of collection to the PBC. Once arrived at the PBC, the CPT tubes are processed. A maximum of 8 x 1 mL PBMC aliquots (minimum of 5 million cells/mL) are derived. PBMC aliquots are stored in liquid nitrogen and banked for future research.

eTier 3 biospecimen parameters are currently under development, but will involve collection of whole blood for clinical chemistry and biobanking and the collection and banking of biospecimens for microbiome analysis.

Tier 2 acute biospecimens include saliva (Oragene OGR-600) and whole blood collections. All post-acute Tier 2 biospecimens consist of whole blood. The maximum amount of blood drawn at a single visit is age dependent. Whole blood is collected using serum separator tube (SST) and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic tube acid (EDTA) across all ages above 24 months and an additional cell preparation tube (CPT) is included for participants 6 years of age and older.

Tier 3 biospecimens consist of whole blood, sputum, swabs (e.g., skin, nasal, oral), urine and stool. Collection of Tier 3 biospecimens is limited to children ages 3 years and older (maximum allowable volume is age dependent).

Statistical methods

We will estimate the proportion of children and young adults experiencing new onset or worsening of each symptom (incidence), stratified by age (0–5, 6–12, 13–17, 18–25 years), over time. Age stratifications were based on child developmental stages, including early childhood (birth to 5 years), school-age (6 to 11 years), adolescence (12 to 17 years) and young adulthood (18 to 25 years) [39]. Prevalence within the recruited population will be estimated by calculating the point prevalence of each symptom by calculating the proportion of children and young adults who are currently experiencing each symptom at each study visit. The excess burden of each symptom due to infection will be assessed by calculating differences in incidence and prevalence between children and young adults with and without an infection history. Odds ratios and relative risks for the association between infection and onset of each symptom will also be calculated, adjusting for sex in each age strata. Logistic regression and poisson regression with robust standard errors will be used in these analyses [68].

A preliminary working definition of PASC will be informed by using variable selection methods to identify which symptoms best differentiate children and young adults with and without an infection, following the methodology previously applied to develop a working definition of PASC in the RECOVER adult cohort [69]. Data from the Tier 1 visit will primarily be used. The estimated associations obtained from regression models will be used to define a PASC score, with a cutoff for PASC defined based on clinical expertise while ensuring that the rate of those with no history of infection who are diagnosed as having PASC is reasonably low. This preliminary symptom-based working definition is intended for research purposes and not clinical diagnosis. It will be modified and augmented by clinical and subclinical findings as they become available. The working definition of PASC that is developed will also be validated in RECOVER participants who have linked EHR data against other definitions derived from EHR-based cohorts [70]. While the working definition of PASC will be initially developed within each age strata, depending on the overlap of key symptoms that are identified that define PASC, some age groups may be aggregated in the interest of developing a more unified definition of PASC. To identify PASC phenotypes among children and young adults who are classified as having PASC defined by symptom patterns, we will use unsupervised learning methods to discover symptom clusters within each age strata (e.g., agglomerative hierarchical clustering [71] and consensus clustering [72]) to define PASC sub-phenotypes.

With this definition of PASC, we will conduct regression analyses to evaluate whether the risk of PASC and PASC sub-types differs by multiple factors, including demographic, clinical, and caregiver characteristics, social determinants of health, SARS-CoV-2 infection and immunization history, symptom severity during the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and therapeutic exposures. Logistic and Poisson regression will be used to evaluate the association (i.e., odds ratios and risk ratios) between pre-infection factors and PASC as a binary outcome, and multinomial regression will be used when PASC sub-types are used as categorical outcomes. Among participants in Tier 2 who develop PASC, we will use time-to-event analyses (i.e., Cox proportional hazards regression) to identify factors that influence time to recovery from PASC. To investigate biomarkers related to PASC, clinical laboratory assessments will be compared between children and young adults who do and do not develop PASC. Mediation analyses will also be used to study the pathways by which SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to the development of PASC. Since the trajectory of how PASC manifests may be affected by the presence of pre-existing conditions, we will study separately the pathophysiology of PASC in children and young adults with and without such conditions, when appropriate.

The study aims cover a wide range of scientific questions, but not all analyses will involve hypothesis testing. For instance, defining PASC does not require hypothesis testing, but evaluating whether the definition of or rates of PASC differ between age groups does. When multiple comparisons are made across age groups or other defined strata, or when different exposures and outcomes are assessed within the same subgroups, multiplicity adjustments for testing of non-exploratory hypotheses will be performed using the Hochberg procedure, in which tests of significance are performed in order of decreasing p-value with increasingly stringent thresholds [73]. This approach has been found to sacrifice less power in observational studies with correlated outcomes compared to the Bonferroni and other standard approaches for addressing multiplicity [74].

Potential sources of missing data include item nonresponse and attrition. Multiple imputation by chained equations will be the primary approach used to handle item nonresponse [75]. Sensitivity analyses will include adjustments for potentially missing not at random data (i.e., informative missingness) using pattern mixture models, which permit the distribution of missing variables to differ between observed and unobserved values. Attrition, or missed visits, in the longitudinal phase of the study (Tier 2) will be addressed depending on the affected analysis. For time-to-event modeling, attrition induces censoring, which may not be independent if participants drop out of the study in a systematic fashion (i.e., participants with worse symptom trajectories may be less likely to continue to participate in the study). Inverse probability of censoring weights will be used to address dependent censoring in this context [76]. For analyses with repeated measures, multiple imputation alongside likelihood-based methods, which are robust to the missing at random assumption, [77] will be used to handle missing data, with pattern mixture models used to perform sensitivity analyses for informatively missing data as appropriate [78].

Statistical analyses will primarily be conducted in R and SAS, though the statistical packages used by individual investigators for future analyses beyond those described in this manuscript will vary.

Power calculations

Power calculations for the de novo cohort were performed prior to recruitment using a type 1 error rate of 0.01 as a preliminary multiplicity adjustment. The actual statistical approach for addressing multiplicity will differ depending on the analysis and will involve more sophisticated methods (see Statistical methods), but these are not amenable to most power calculations. With 4,800 infected and 1,200 uninfected children and young adults from both acute and post-acute arms in Tier 1, as well as 10,000 children ages 12–17 from the ABCD cohort (assuming 3,500 are infected and 6,500 are uninfected), assuming the risk of a given symptom in the uninfected group is 10%, we have 90% power to detect a difference as small as 1.9% in the frequency of that symptom between groups.

In Tier 2, given the sampling and promotion framework described in Timing of Study Assessments, our sample with longitudinal follow-up will be skewed towards those who are more likely to have PASC. Following development of a definition of PASC, we consider the scenario in which we assume that of the 5,400 children and young adults with a history of infection in Tier 2, 3,600 meet PASC criteria and 1,800 do not. For a hypothetical risk factor with 50% prevalence in the PASC- group, we have 90% power to detect an odds ratio as small as 1.25 for the odds of PASC for those with the risk factor versus those without. For a factor with 25% prevalence in the PASC-negative group, the minimum detectable odds ratio is 1.28. In our Tier 3 sample of 600 children and young adults with history of infection (which includes additional data on biomarkers), assuming the sample has 400 with PASC and 200 without PASC, for a marker with 10% prevalence in the PASC- group, we have 90% power to detect an odds ratio as small as 2.60 for PASC.

Given that many analyses will be stratified by age group, we calculate minimum detectable effect sizes overall and within each age stratum in S7 Table. Estimates of the distribution of ages are based on early enrollment data, with 26% of main cohort participants in the age 0–5 years category, 28% in ages 6–11 years, 26% in ages 12–17 years, and 20% in ages 18–25 years.

Discussion

The overall goal of RECOVER-Pediatrics is to improve our understanding of recovery after SARS-CoV-2 infection, with a focus on the prevalence, natural history, and pathogenesis of PASC in children and young adults. Successful completion should lead to formal characterization of pediatric PASC as its own syndrome. This is essential to develop diagnostic, treatment, and preventive strategies tailored to children’s unique physiology.

RECOVER-Pediatrics is well positioned to ascertain the epidemiology, four-year clinical course, and sociodemographic contributions to pediatric PASC, with rich data and biosamples available to readily test further mechanistic hypotheses, establish biomarkers, and provide insights into potential therapies. The meta-cohort is designed to provide details that are not available in other large epidemiologic or electronic health records queries, including a dynamic study design that can be flexible and responsive as new variants arise, and as our understanding of the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 evolves. RECOVER-Pediatrics was designed to include a wide range of ages, and diverse socioeconomic, racial, ethnic and geographic populations to ensure that findings are generalizable, and provide equitable benefit for all.

The generation-defining nature of the COVID-19 pandemic will impact the life course of children in ways that we have yet to fully understand. The unprecedented scope of RECOVER-Pediatrics sets the stage for not only characterizing a new disorder that will impact children for years to come, but also for identifying and deploying solutions through its collaborations with investigators and communities across the country.

RECOVER-Pediatrics is expected to gather a rich data set that can be used to develop treatments for persons with Long COVID and provide guidelines for how to respond more quickly to prevent, reduce the consequences, and treat complications of future coronavirus outbreaks which are likely to emerge.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. SPIRIT clinical trials checklist.

(DOCX)

pone.0285635.s001.docx (31.5KB, docx)
S1 Table. Hubs and enrolling sites.

(DOCX)

pone.0285635.s002.docx (34.9KB, docx)
S2 Table. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

(DOCX)

pone.0285635.s003.docx (25.7KB, docx)
S3 Table. Inclusion into analytic groups.

(DOCX)

pone.0285635.s004.docx (25.7KB, docx)
S4 Table. World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

(DOCX)

pone.0285635.s005.docx (26.4KB, docx)
S5 Table. Survey topics in tiers 1 and 2 questionnaires.

(DOCX)

pone.0285635.s006.docx (38.5KB, docx)
S6 Table. Clinical and laboratory assessments across the tiers in the de novo RECOVER-Pediatrics cohort.

(DOCX)

pone.0285635.s007.docx (29.6KB, docx)
S7 Table. Power calculations to determine minimum detectable effect sizes, stratified by age group.

(DOCX)

pone.0285635.s008.docx (14.2KB, docx)
S1 Appendix. RECOVER-Pediatrics consortium members.

(DOCX)

pone.0285635.s009.docx (76.3KB, docx)
S1 Protocol. RECOVER-Pediatrics protocol.

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s010.pdf (1.7MB, pdf)
S1 Text

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s011.pdf (81.7KB, pdf)
S2 Text

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s012.pdf (97.1KB, pdf)
S3 Text

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s013.pdf (69.4KB, pdf)
S4 Text

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s014.pdf (85KB, pdf)
S5 Text

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s015.pdf (85.7KB, pdf)
S6 Text

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s016.pdf (70.3KB, pdf)
S1 File

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s017.pdf (1.7MB, pdf)
S2 File

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s018.pdf (243.7KB, pdf)
S3 File

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s019.pdf (231.4KB, pdf)
S4 File

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s020.pdf (262.5KB, pdf)
S5 File

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s021.pdf (235.7KB, pdf)
S6 File

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s022.pdf (335.1KB, pdf)
S7 File

(PDF)

pone.0285635.s023.pdf (204.5KB, pdf)
S1 Data

(ZIP)

pone.0285635.s024.zip (71.1MB, zip)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the National Community Engagement Group (NCEG), all patient, caregiver and community representatives, and all the participants enrolled in the RECOVER initiative.

Disclaimer: Authorship has been determined according to ICMJE recommendations. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the RECOVER program, the NIH or other funders.

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.

Funding Statement

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Agreement OTA OT2HL161847 (SDK, RG), OT2HL161841 (ASF). https://www.nih.gov/ The funders did not and will not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Long COVID or Post-COVID Conditions 2023 [cited 2023 September 28, 2023]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/long-term-effects/index.html.
  • 2.Soriano JB, Murthy S, Marshall JC, Relan P, Diaz JV. A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(4):e102–e7. Epub 20211221. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00703-9 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Davis HE, McCorkell L, Vogel JM, Topol EJ. Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023;21(3):133–46. Epub 20230113. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00846-2 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard 2023 2023. https://covid19.who.int/.
  • 5.Zimmermann P, Pittet LF, Curtis N. How common is Long COVID in children and adolescents? Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021;40(12):e482–e7. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003328 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kompaniyets L, Bull-Otterson L, Boehmer TK, Baca S, Alvarez P, Hong K, et al. Post-COVID-19 symptoms and conditions among children and adolescents—United States, March 1, 2020-January 31, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(31):993–9. Epub 20220805. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7131a3 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Borch L, Holm M, Knudsen M, Ellermann-Eriksen S, Hagstroem S. Long COVID symptoms and duration in SARS-CoV-2 positive children—a nationwide cohort study. Eur J Pediatr. 2022;181(4):1597–607. Epub 20220109. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04345-z . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Forrest CB, Burrows EK, Mejias A, Razzaghi H, Christakis D, Jhaveri R, et al. Severity of acute COVID-19 in children <18 years old March 2020 to December 2021. Pediatrics. 2022;149(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-055765 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lopez-Leon S, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Ayuzo Del Valle NC, Perelman C, Sepulveda R, Rebolledo PA, et al. Long-COVID in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):9950. Epub 20220623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13495-5 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chua PEY, Shah SU, Gui H, Koh J, Somani J, Pang J. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of non-severe and severe pediatric and adult COVID-19 patients across different geographical regions in the early phase of pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Investig Med. 2021;69(7):1287–96. Epub 20210616. doi: 10.1136/jim-2021-001858 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Funk AL, Kuppermann N, Florin TA, Tancredi DJ, Xie J, Kim K, et al. Post-COVID-19 conditions among children 90 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2223253. Epub 20220701. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23253 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Groff D, Sun A, Ssentongo AE, Ba DM, Parsons N, Poudel GR, et al. Short-term and long-term rates of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(10):e2128568. Epub 20211001. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28568 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dufort EM, Koumans EH, Chow EJ, Rosenthal EM, Muse A, Rowlands J, et al. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children in New York State. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(4):347–58. Epub 20200629. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021756 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). COVID data tracker 2023 [cited 2023 March 9]. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#mis-national-surveillance.
  • 15.Stephenson T, Pinto Pereira SM, Shafran R, de Stavola BL, Rojas N, McOwat K, et al. Physical and mental health 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection (long COVID) among adolescents in England (CLoCk): a national matched cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6(4):230–9. Epub 20220208. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00022-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hernandez-Romieu AC, Carton TW, Saydah S, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Boehmer TK, Garret NY, et al. Prevalence of select new symptoms and conditions among persons aged younger than 20 years and 20 years or older at 31 to 150 days after testing positive or negative for SARS-CoV-2. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e2147053. Epub 20220201. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47053 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Buonsenso D, E Pujol F, Munblit D, Pata D, McFarland S, Simpson FK. Clinical characteristics, activity levels and mental health problems in children with long coronavirus disease: a survey of 510 children. Future Microbiol. 2022;17(8):577–88. Epub 20220401. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2021-0285 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kikkenborg Berg S, Dam Nielsen S, Nygaard U, Bundgaard H, Palm P, Rotvig C, et al. Long COVID symptoms in SARS-CoV-2-positive adolescents and matched controls (LongCOVIDKidsDK): a national, cross-sectional study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6(4):240–8. Epub 20220208. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00004-9 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wulf Hanson S, Abbafati C, Aerts JG, Al-Aly Z, Ashbaugh C, Ballouz T, et al. Estimated global proportions of individuals with persistent fatigue, cognitive, and respiratory symptom clusters following symptomatic COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021. Jama. 2022;328(16):1604–15. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18931 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haddad A, Janda A, Renk H, Stich M, Frieh P, Kaier K, et al. Long COVID symptoms in exposed and infected children, adolescents and their parents one year after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A prospective observational cohort study. EBioMedicine. 2022;84:104245. Epub 20220922. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104245 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Roessler M, Tesch F, Batram M, Jacob J, Loser F, Weidinger O, et al. Post-COVID-19-associated morbidity in children, adolescents, and adults: A matched cohort study including more than 157,000 individuals with COVID-19 in Germany. PLoS Med. 2022;19(11):e1004122. Epub 20221110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004122 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brugler Yonts A. Pediatric Long-COVID: A review of the definition, epidemiology, presentation, and pathophysiology. Pediatr Ann. 2022;51(11):e416–e20. Epub 20221101. doi: 10.3928/19382359-20220913-06 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rao S, Lee GM, Razzaghi H, Lorman V, Mejias A, Pajor NM, et al. Clinical features and burden of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in children and adolescents. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(10):1000–9. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.2800 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Morrow AK, Malone LA, Kokorelis C, Petracek LS, Eastin EF, Lobner KL, et al. Long-term COVID 19 sequelae in adolescents: the overlap with orthostatic intolerance and ME/CFS. Curr Pediatr Rep. 2022;10(2):31–44. Epub 20220309. doi: 10.1007/s40124-022-00261-4 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.National Institutes of Health. RECOVER: Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery 2023 [cited 2023 March 12]. https://recovercovid.org/.
  • 26.Barch DM, Albaugh MD, Avenevoli S, Chang L, Clark DB, Glantz MD, et al. Demographic, physical and mental health assessments in the adolescent brain and cognitive development study: Rationale and description. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018;32:55–66. Epub 20171103. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.10.010 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Volkow ND, Koob GF, Croyle RT, Bianchi DW, Gordon JA, Koroshetz WJ, et al. The conception of the ABCD study: From substance use to a broad NIH collaboration. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018;32:4–7. Epub 20171010. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.10.002 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network 2023. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/mfmu. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 29.The Regents of the University of California. PRIORITY: Pregnancy Coronavirus Outcomes Registry University of California, San Francisco2023. https://priority.ucsf.edu/.
  • 30.Truong DT, Trachtenberg FL, Pearson GD, Dionne A, Elias MD, Friedman K, et al. The NHLBI Study on Long-terM OUtcomes after the Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome In Children (MUSIC): Design and objectives. Am Heart J. 2022;243:43–53. Epub 20210819. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.08.003 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Davis TC, Gazmararian J, Kennen EM. Approaches to improving health literacy: lessons from the field. J Health Commun. 2006;11(6):551–4. doi: 10.1080/10810730600835517 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Garavan H, Bartsch H, Conway K, Decastro A, Goldstein RZ, Heeringa S, et al. Recruiting the ABCD sample: Design considerations and procedures. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018;32:16–22. Epub 20180416. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.004 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.World Health Organization. Public health surveillance for COVID-19: interim guidance, 2022 [updated July 22]. No. WHO/2019-nCoV/SurveillanceGuidance/2022.2. World Health Organization, 2022.
  • 34.Kallen MA, Lai JS, Blackwell CK, Schuchard JR, Forrest CB, Wakschlag LS, et al. Measuring PROMIS® Global Health in Early Childhood. J Pediatr Psychol. 2022;47(5):523–33. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsac026 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Forrest CB, Bevans KB, Pratiwadi R, Moon J, Teneralli RE, Minton JM, et al. Development of the PROMIS ® pediatric global health (PGH-7) measure. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(4):1221–31. Epub 20131122. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0581-8 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D. Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(7):873–80. Epub 20090619. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Walker LS, Beck JE, Garber J, Lambert W. Children’s Somatization Inventory: psychometric properties of the revised form (CSI-24). J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34(4):430–40. Epub 20080909. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn093 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Denny JC, Rutter JL, Goldstein DB, Philippakis A, Smoller JW, Jenkins G, et al. The "All of Us" Research Program. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(7):668–76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1809937 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Data Resourse Center for Child and Adolescent Health. The National Survey of Children’s Health 2021 [March 12, 2023]. https://www.childhealthdata.org/learn-about-the-nsch/NSCH.
  • 40.Bethell CD, Read D, Stein RE, Blumberg SJ, Wells N, Newacheck PW. Identifying children with special health care needs: development and evaluation of a short screening instrument. Ambul Pediatr. 2002;2(1):38–48. doi: . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Read D, Bethell C, Blumberg SJ, Abreu M, Molina C. An evaluation of the linguistic and cultural validity of the Spanish language version of the children with special health care needs screener. Matern Child Health J. 2007;11(6):568–85. Epub 20070612. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0207-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2023 [cited 2023 March 12]. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/index.html.
  • 43.Sausen KA, Randolph JW, Casciato AN, Dietrich MS, Scholer SJ. The development, preliminary validation, and clinical application of the quick parenting assessment. Prev Sci. 2022;23(2):306–20. Epub 20211115. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01320-w . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Economic Research Service USDoA. U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module 2022 [updated October 17; cited 2023 March 12]. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-u-s/survey-tools/.
  • 45.RAND Corporation. Social Support Survey Instrument [cited 2023 March 12]. https://www.rand.org/health-care/surveys_tools/mos/social-support/survey-instrument.html.
  • 46.Freeman R, Wieling W, Axelrod FB, Benditt DG, Benarroch E, Biaggioni I, et al. Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome. Auton Neurosci. 2011;161(1–2):46–8. Epub 20110309. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2011.02.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Singer W, Sletten DM, Opfer-Gehrking TL, Brands CK, Fischer PR, Low PA. Postural tachycardia in children and adolescents: what is abnormal? J Pediatr. 2012;160(2):222–6. Epub 20111011. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.08.054 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Malek S, Reinhold EJ, Pearce GS. The Beighton Score as a measure of generalised joint hypermobility. Rheumatol Int. 2021;41(10):1707–16. Epub 20210318. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04832-4 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Squires J, Bricker D, Potter L. Revision of a parent-completed development screening tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires. J Pediatr Psychol. 1997;22(3):313–28. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/22.3.313 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Squires J B D. Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3): A Parent-Completed Child Monitoring System. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Squires J, Potter L, Bricker D. The ASQ user’s guide for the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: A parent-completed, child-monitoring system Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing Company; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Robins DL, Casagrande K, Barton M, Chen CM, Dumont-Mathieu T, Fein D. Validation of the modified checklist for Autism in toddlers, revised with follow-up (M-CHAT-R/F). Pediatrics. 2014;133(1):37–45. Epub 20131223. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1813 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Weintraub S, Dikmen SS, Heaton RK, Tulsky DS, Zelazo PD, Bauer PJ, et al. Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013;80(11 Suppl 3):S54–64. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872ded . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Squires J B D, Twombly E. Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Achenbach TM. Child behavior checklist. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Irwin DE, Gross HE, Stucky BD, Thissen D, DeWitt EM, Lai JS, et al. Development of six PROMIS pediatrics proxy-report item banks. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:22. Epub 20120222. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-22 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bevans KB, Gardner W, Pajer KA, Becker B, Carle A, Tucker CA, et al. Psychometric Evaluation of the PROMIS® Pediatric Psychological and Physical Stress Experiences Measures. J Pediatr Psychol. 2018;43(6):678–92. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy010 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Forrest CB, Ravens-Sieberer U, Devine J, Becker BD, Teneralli R, Moon J, et al. Development and Evaluation of the PROMIS(®) Pediatric Positive Affect Item Bank, Child-Report and Parent-Proxy Editions. J Happiness Stud. 2018;19(3):699–718. Epub 20170121. doi: 10.1007/s10902-016-9843-9 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chorpita BF, Yim L, Moffitt C, Umemoto LA, Francis SE. Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: a revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behav Res Ther. 2000;38(8):835–55. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00130-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Goodman R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38(5):581–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Achenbach T, Rescorla L. Manual for the ASEBA adult forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Schrank FA, McGrew KS, Mather N. Woodcock-Johnson IV. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Adams W, Sheslow D. Wide-Range Assessment of Memory and Learning– 3rd Edition. Bloomington, MN: Pearson; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Beery K, Beery N. Beery VMI: The Beery-Buktenica Developmental test of visual-motor integration with supplemental developmental tests of visual perception and motor coordination: Stepping stones age norms from birth to age six. administration, scoring, and teaching manual: PsychCorp; 2010.
  • 65.Science Research Associates. SRA examiner’s manual for the Purdue Pegboard. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates; 1948. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Townsend L, Kobak K, Kearney C, Milham M, Andreotti C, Escalera J, et al. Development of three web-based computerized versions of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Child Psychiatric Diagnostic Interview: Preliminary Validity Data Journal of American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2020;59(2):309–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tasso Inc. Tasso-M20 2023 [cited 2023 March 12]. https://www.tassoinc.com/tasso-m20.
  • 68.Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):702–6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh090 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Thaweethai T, Jolley SE, Karlson EW, Levitan EB, Levy B, McComsey GA, et al. Development of a Definition of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Jama. 2023;329(22):1934–46. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.8823 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lorman V, Rao S, Jhaveri R, Case A, Mejias A, Pajor NM, et al. Understanding pediatric long COVID using a tree-based scan statistic approach: an EHR-based cohort study from the RECOVER Program. JAMIA Open. 2023;6(1):ooad016. Epub 20230314. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad016 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Murtagh F C P. Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: an overview. WIREs Data Mining Knowl Discov. 2011. doi: 10.1002/widm.53 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Monti S TP, Mesirov J, Golub T. Consensus clustering: a resampling-based method for class discovery and visualization of gene expression microarray data. Machine Learning. 2003;52(1):91–118. doi: 10.1023/A:1023949509487 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika. 1998;75 800–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Leon AC, Heo M, Teres JJ, Morikawa T. Statistical power of multiplicity adjustment strategies for correlated binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2007;26(8):1712–23. doi: 10.1002/sim.2795 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011;30(4):377–99. Epub 20101130. doi: 10.1002/sim.4067 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Robins JM, Finkelstein DM. Correcting for noncompliance and dependent censoring in an AIDS Clinical Trial with inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) log-rank tests. Biometrics. 2000;56(3):779–88. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00779.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Daniels MJ H J. Missing data in longitudinal studies: Strategies for Bayesian Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis. 1st Edition ed. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2008. March 10, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Little RJ, Wang Y. Pattern-mixture models for multivariate incomplete data with covariates. Biometrics. 1996;52(1):98–111. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi

6 Jul 2023

PONE-D-23-10495Researching COVID to enhance recovery (RECOVER) pediatric study protocol: Rationale, objectives and designPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gross,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 20 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. Specifically, please clarify how consent will be collected from the parents or legal guardians of the minors included in your study. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified what type of consent you obtained form the parents or legal guardians (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed).

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

“I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Brett Anderson reported receiving direct support for work not related to RECOVER work/publications from Genentech and the National Institute of Allergy and Immunology.

Walter Dehority reported receiving grant support from Merck and participating in research for the Moderna COVID-19 pediatric vaccine trial and the Pfizer Paxlovid trial.

Alex Fiks reported receiving support from NJM insurance and personal consulting fees not related to this paper from Rutgers University and the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Ashraf Harahsheh reported serving as a scientific advisory board member unrelated to this paper for OP2 DRUGS.

Lawrence Kleinman reported serving as an unpaid member of the Board of Directors for the DARTNet Institute, as a principle investigator at Quality Matters, Inc., and as the Vice Chair for the Borough of Metuchen Board of Health. Dr. Kleinman also reported grant support for work not related to RECOVER work/publications from NIH, HRSA, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Dr. Kleinman also reported minority individual stock ownership in Apple Computer, Sanofi SA, Experion, GlaxoSmithKline, Magyar Bank, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, JP Morgan Chase, and Amgen Inc.

Torri Metz reported participating as a Principle Investigator in the medical advisory board for the planning of a Pfizer clinical trial of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy. She is also a principle investigator for a Pfizer study evaluating the pharmacokinetics of Paxlovid in pregnant people with COVID-19.

Joshua Milner reported serving as a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Blueprint Medicines, in a capacity unrelated to RECOVER work/publications.”

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. One of the noted authors is a group or consortium “RECOVER Initiative”. In addition to naming the author group, please list the individual authors and affiliations within this group in the acknowledgments section of your manuscript. Please also indicate clearly a lead author for this group along with a contact email address.

5. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does the manuscript provide a valid rationale for the proposed study, with clearly identified and justified research questions?

The research question outlined is expected to address a valid academic problem or topic and contribute to the base of knowledge in the field.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

2. Is the protocol technically sound and planned in a manner that will lead to a meaningful outcome and allow testing the stated hypotheses?

The manuscript should describe the methods in sufficient detail to prevent undisclosed flexibility in the experimental procedure or analysis pipeline, including sufficient outcome-neutral conditions (e.g. necessary controls, absence of floor or ceiling effects) to test the proposed hypotheses and a statistical power analysis where applicable. As there may be aspects of the methodology and analysis which can only be refined once the work is undertaken, authors should outline potential assumptions and explicitly describe what aspects of the proposed analyses, if any, are exploratory.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Is the methodology feasible and described in sufficient detail to allow the work to be replicable?

Descriptions of methods and materials in the protocol should be reported in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce all experiments and analyses. The protocol should describe the appropriate controls, sample size calculations, and replication needed to ensure that the data are robust and reproducible.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors described where all data underlying the findings will be made available when the study is complete?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception, at the time of publication. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above and, if applicable, provide comments about issues authors must address before this protocol can be accepted for publication. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about research or publication ethics.

You may also provide optional suggestions and comments to authors that they might find helpful in planning their study.

(Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I read the protocol with interest and have no major comment. There is a need for such large-scale studies to present data in a meta fashion.

My decision is to accept it; however, I wish to ask the authors how they plan to deal with pediatric patients with pre-existing diseases, especially those with autoimmune disorders and inborn errors of immunity. Then, I suggest to include it briefly in methods or discussion.

Reviewer #2: How the age groups were determined for the study sample?

Power calculation: Effect sizes need to be justified. Since most of the analyses appear to be stratified by age groups, it is important to consider the power calculation for each stratum. Given the number of variables being tested, a more stringent Type I error may be considered.

How do you plan to address the issue of multiple comparisons and adjust for multiplicity?

The determination of PASC is not clearly written. How will you validate the definition of PASC? What if the PASC cannot be differentiated, especially the sample size may be small in each age strata?

Statistical Analysis:

Which statistical models do you plan to use to address the research questions? Logistic regression? Multiple regression? Will you use models for repeated measurements or survival models for time-to-event data?

Reviewer #3: Overall, this article provides a comprehensive overview of the RECOVER-Pediatrics study, which aims to characterize the clinical course, underlying mechanisms, and long-term health effects of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) in children and young adults. The article effectively highlights the unique challenges in understanding PASC symptoms in children and emphasizes the need for large-scale studies to define and recognize PASC in this population. The study design and methodology are well-described, and the article provides a clear outline of the study aims and objectives.

Minor comments:

The article would benefit from a clearer and more concise introduction. The current introduction provides a lot of statistics and information upfront, which can be overwhelming for the reader.

Consider restructuring the introduction to provide a brief overview of PASC in children and its impact before delving into the prevalence and incidence statistics.

Some of the sentences in the article are long and complex, which can make it difficult to follow the main points. Try breaking down these sentences into smaller, more digestible chunks to improve readability.For example, in the sentence "Given that young children might not be able to articulate symptoms, studies must rely on caregiver interpretation," breaking it into two sentences would make it easier to follow.

It would be helpful to provide more information about the selection process and criteria for the 10 hubs managing the study sites. Additionally, mentioning the geographical distribution of the sites or regions covered would provide context and a better understanding of the study's reach.

Reviewer #4: In this manuscript, Gross and colleagues present the protocol of the RECOVER-Pediatrics study, which aims to comprehensively characterize the clinical course, underlying mechanisms, and long-term effects of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 from birth through 25 years old. Overall, the manuscript effectively introduces a well-designed protocol. However, I have a few suggestions for improvement:

1- The authors should consider adding a specific definition of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) in the first paragraph of the introduction. Providing a concise and clear definition would enhance the readers' understanding of the study's focus and objectives.

2- It would be beneficial if the authors could elaborate on how they plan to handle missing data. Addressing this aspect in the manuscript would enhance the transparency of the study's methodology.

3- In order to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the statistical analysis plan, the authors should consider including additional details, such as the software that will be used for the analysis and the specific statistical tests that will be employed. This information would help readers evaluate the rigor and validity of the study's statistical approach.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 May 7;19(5):e0285635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285635.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


30 Oct 2023

Reviewer #1:

1. I read the protocol with interest and have no major comment. There is a need for such large-scale studies to present data in a meta fashion. My decision is to accept it; however, I wish to ask the authors how they plan to deal with pediatric patients with pre-existing diseases, especially those with autoimmune disorders and inborn errors of immunity. Then, I suggest to include it briefly in methods or discussion.

Thank you for this comment. We agree that is important to collect data about pre-existing diseases. We added information to the methods describing our assessment of special health care needs in children and young adults. We also added details in the statistical analysis section about how we can account for special health care needs in the analyses. For example, certain analyses can exclude participants with certain conditions or adjust for differences statistically as appropriate. Furthermore, additional analyses will focus on certain conditions in order to learn about Long COVID in children with these specific special health care needs.

The following text in italics was added to the manuscript in the section called Main categories of data:

“Surveys assess sociodemographic information [36], child birth history [37], special health care needs [37-39], including an assessment of pre-existing conditions, SARS-CoV-2 infection history, related conditions (e.g., MIS-C, POTS or other form of dysautonomia, and Long COVID diagnoses), COVID testing and vaccine history, COVID-related symptoms (both acute and long-term), COVID health consequences (e.g., diet [40], physical activity [40], sleep [40], screen time [40], schooling, parenting [41]) and social determinants of health (e.g., food insecurity [42], social support [43]).”

The following text was added to the manuscript in the statistical methods section:

“Logistic and poisson regression will be used to evaluate the association (i.e., odds ratios and risk ratios) between pre-infection factors and PASC as a binary outcome, and multinomial regression will be used when PASC sub-types are used as categorical outcomes.”

The following text was also added to the manuscript in the statistical methods section:

“Since the trajectory of how PASC manifests may be affected by the presence of pre-existing conditions, we will study separately the pathophysiology of PASC in children and young adults with and without such conditions, when appropriate.”

Reviewer #2:

2. How the age groups were determined for the study sample?

RECOVER-Pediatrics was designed to study Long COVID across the entire childhood life course. Age stratifications were based on child developmental stages, including early childhood (birth to 5 years), school-age (6 to 11 years), adolescence (12 to 17 years) and young adulthood (18 to 25 years). The age groups parallel the age grouping used in the National Survey of Children’s Health. We chose to study these different developmental stages to determine if PASC will need to be defined differently for different age groups.

To clarify this for the reader, the following text was added to the first paragraph of the statistical methods section:

“Age stratifications were based on child developmental stages, including early childhood (birth to 5 years), school-age (6 to 11 years), adolescence (12 to 17 years) and young adulthood (18 to 25 years).”

3. Power calculation: Effect sizes need to be justified. Since most of the analyses appear to be stratified by age groups, it is important to consider the power calculation for each stratum. Given the number of variables being tested, a more stringent Type I error may be considered.

Thank you for this comment. We agree that more details about power is needed given that we will be conducting stratified analyses by age groups, since PASC may present differently for different age groups.

The following text was added to the first paragraph of the statistical methods section:

“Age stratifications were based on child developmental stages, including early childhood (birth to 5 years), school-age (6 to 11 years), adolescence (12 to 17 years) and young adulthood (18 to 25 years).”

The following text was added to the second paragraph of the statistical methods section:

“While the working definition of PASC will be initially developed within each age strata, depending on the overlap of key symptoms that are identified that define PASC, some age groups may be aggregated in the interest of developing a more unified definition of PASC.”

The following text was added to the end of the power calculations section:

“Given that many analyses will be stratified by age group, we calculate minimum detectable effect sizes overall and within each age stratum in Supplemental Table 7. Estimates of the distribution of ages are based on early enrollment data, with 26% of main cohort participants in the age 0-5 year category, 28% in ages 6-11 years, 26% in ages 12-17 years, and 20% in ages 18-25 years.”

4. How do you plan to address the issue of multiple comparisons and adjust for multiplicity?

The following text was added as the fourth paragraph of the statistical methods section to describe the plan for multiple comparisons and adjustments for multiplicity.

“The study aims cover a wide range of scientific questions, but not all analyses will involve hypothesis testing. For instance, defining PASC does not require hypothesis testing, but evaluating whether the definition of or rates of PASC differ between age groups does. When multiple comparisons are made across age groups or other defined strata, or when different exposures and outcomes are assessed within the same subgroups, multiplicity adjustments for testing of non-exploratory hypotheses will be performed using the Hochberg procedure, in which tests of significance are performed in order of decreasing p-value with increasingly stringent thresholds. This approach has been found to sacrifice less power in observational studies with correlated outcomes compared to the Bonferroni and other standard approaches for addressing multiplicity.”

5. The determination of PASC is not clearly written. How will you validate the definition of PASC? What if the PASC cannot be differentiated, especially the sample size may be small in each age strata?

Thank you for this question. Since the initial submission of this study design paper, substantial work has been conducted within RECOVER to begin defining PASC in the adult cohort. This work will inform the working definition of PASC in children and young adults.

The following text was added to the second paragraph of the statistical methods section to explain this:

“A preliminary working definition of PASC will be informed by using variable selection methods to identify which symptoms best differentiate children and young adults with and without an infection, following the methodology previously applied to develop a working definition of PASC in the RECOVER adult cohort. Data from the tier 1 visit will primarily be used.”

The following text was added to the second paragraph of the statistical methods section to explain this:

“The estimated associations obtained from regression models will be used to define a PASC score, with a cutoff for PASC defined based on clinical expertise while ensuring that the rate of those with no history of infection who are diagnosed as having PASC is reasonably low. This preliminary symptoms-based working definition is intended for research purposes and not a clinical diagnosis. It will be modified and augmented by clinical and subclinical findings as they become available. The working definition of PASC that is developed will also be validated in RECOVER participants who have linked EHR data against other definitions derived from EHR-based cohorts. While the working definition of PASC will be initially developed within each age strata, depending on the overlap of key symptoms that are identified that define PASC, some age groups may be aggregated in the interest of developing a more unified definition of PASC. To identify PASC phenotypes among children and young adults who are classified as having PASC defined by symptom patterns, we will use unsupervised learning methods to discover symptom clusters within each age strata (e.g., agglomerative hierarchical clustering [66] and consensus clustering [67]) to define PASC sub-phenotypes.”

6. Statistical Analysis: Which statistical models do you plan to use to address the research questions? Logistic regression? Multiple regression? Will you use models for repeated measurements or survival models for time-to-event data?

The following text was added to the third paragraph of the statistical methods section to provide more details about our statistical analysis plan.

“Logistic and poisson regression will be used to evaluate the association between pre-infection factors and PASC as a binary outcome, and multinomial regression will be used when PASC sub-type is used as a categorical outcome. Among participants in Tier 2 who develop PASC, we will use time-to-event analyses (i.e., Cox proportional hazards regression) to identify factors that influence time to recovery from PASC.”

Reviewer #3:

Overall, this article provides a comprehensive overview of the RECOVER-Pediatrics study, which aims to characterize the clinical course, underlying mechanisms, and long-term health effects of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) in children and young adults. The article effectively highlights the unique challenges in understanding PASC symptoms in children and emphasizes the need for large-scale studies to define and recognize PASC in this population. The study design and methodology are well-described, and the article provides a clear outline of the study aims and objectives.

Minor comments:

7. The article would benefit from a clearer and more concise introduction. The current introduction provides a lot of statistics and information upfront, which can be overwhelming for the reader.

Consider restructuring the introduction to provide a brief overview of PASC in children and its impact before delving into the prevalence and incidence statistics.

We appreciate this feedback. We have added a brief overview of PASC in children at the beginning of the introduction.

The following text was added at the beginning of the introduction:

“Long COVID, or the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), has been defined as symptoms, signs and conditions that continue or develop after a SARS-CoV-2 infection. These symptoms can affect people for weeks, months or even years after getting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Symptoms can develop shortly after the initial recovery from an acute COVID-19 episode or persist from the initial illness. Symptoms may also emerge later or fluctuate or relapse over time. These symptoms can have debilitating effects on the daily health and quality of life of those affected.”

8. Some of the sentences in the article are long and complex, which can make it difficult to follow the main points. Try breaking down these sentences into smaller, more digestible chunks to improve readability. For example, in the sentence "Given that young children might not be able to articulate symptoms, studies must rely on caregiver interpretation," breaking it into two sentences would make it easier to follow.

We have broken many of the longer sentences into multiple sentences in order to enhance the readability of the paper.

For example, we divided the sentence noted above into two sentences.

“For example, young children might not be able to articulate their symptoms. This has required studies to rely on caregiver interpretation of their young child’s symptoms.”

9. It would be helpful to provide more information about the selection process and criteria for the 10 hubs managing the study sites.

The following information about the selection process was added to the end of the section called Study organizational structure and management.

“Awardees were selected through a process that included independent peer review in response to OTA-21-015B.”

10. Additionally, mentioning the geographical distribution of the sites or regions covered would provide context and a better understanding of the study's reach.

The RECOVER-Pediatric study has wide geographic reach with sites located within 39 states, as well as Washington DC and Puerto Rico. The pediatric study also includes two large practice-based networks that are recruiting nationally in locations that may not have a larger site nearby. Supplemental Table 1 includes a list of all RECOVER-Pediatric sites and their locations.

The following sentence was also added to the manuscript in the study organizational structure and management section.

“RECOVER-Pediatrics includes 10 hubs that manage ~100 sites (Supplemental Table 1), located in more than 39 states, Washington DC and Puerto Rico.”

Reviewer #4:

In this manuscript, Gross and colleagues present the protocol of the RECOVER-Pediatrics study, which aims to comprehensively characterize the clinical course, underlying mechanisms, and long-term effects of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 from birth through 25 years old. Overall, the manuscript effectively introduces a well-designed protocol. However, I have a few suggestions for improvement:

11. The authors should consider adding a specific definition of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) in the first paragraph of the introduction. Providing a concise and clear definition would enhance the readers' understanding of the study's focus and objectives.

Thank you for this comment. This aligns with reviewer 3’s request in comment 7.

The following concise and clear definition of PASC was added at the beginning of the introduction:

“Long COVID, or the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), has been defined as symptoms, signs and conditions that continue or develop after a SARS-CoV-2 infection. These symptoms can affect people for weeks, months or even years after getting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Symptoms can develop shortly after the initial recovery from an acute COVID-19 episode or persist from the initial illness. Symptoms may also emerge later or fluctuate or relapse over time. These symptoms can have debilitating effects on the daily health and quality of life of those affected.”

12. It would be beneficial if the authors could elaborate on how they plan to handle missing data. Addressing this aspect in the manuscript would enhance the transparency of the study's methodology.

Thank you for this comment. We added more detail about the study plan for handling missing data.

The following text was added as the fifth paragraph of the statistical methods section:

“Potential sources of missing data include item nonresponse and attrition. Multiple imputation by chained equations will be the primary approach used to handle item nonresponse. Sensitivity analyses will include adjustments for potentially missing not at random data (i.e., informative missingness) using pattern mixture models, which permit the distribution of missing variables to differ between observed and unobserved values. Attrition, or missed visits, in the longitudinal phase of the study (Tier 2) will be addressed depending on the affected analysis. For time-to-event modeling, attrition induces censoring, which may not be independent if participants drop out of the study in a systematic fashion (i.e., participants with worse symptom trajectories may be less likely to continue to participate in the study). Inverse probability of censoring weights will be used to address dependent censoring in this context. For analyses with repeated measures, multiple imputation alongside likelihood-based methods, which are robust to the missing at random assumption, will be used to handle missing data, with pattern mixture models used to perform sensitivity analyses for informatively missing data as appropriate.”

13. In order to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the statistical analysis plan, the authors should consider including additional details, such as the software that will be used for the analysis and the specific statistical tests

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.2023.09.29.docx

pone.0285635.s025.docx (32.7KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi

22 Nov 2023

Researching COVID to enhance recovery (RECOVER) pediatric study protocol: Rationale, objectives and design

PONE-D-23-10495R1

Dear Dr. Gross,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does the manuscript provide a valid rationale for the proposed study, with clearly identified and justified research questions?

The research question outlined is expected to address a valid academic problem or topic and contribute to the base of knowledge in the field.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

2. Is the protocol technically sound and planned in a manner that will lead to a meaningful outcome and allow testing the stated hypotheses?

The manuscript should describe the methods in sufficient detail to prevent undisclosed flexibility in the experimental procedure or analysis pipeline, including sufficient outcome-neutral conditions (e.g. necessary controls, absence of floor or ceiling effects) to test the proposed hypotheses and a statistical power analysis where applicable. As there may be aspects of the methodology and analysis which can only be refined once the work is undertaken, authors should outline potential assumptions and explicitly describe what aspects of the proposed analyses, if any, are exploratory.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Is the methodology feasible and described in sufficient detail to allow the work to be replicable?

Descriptions of methods and materials in the protocol should be reported in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce all experiments and analyses. The protocol should describe the appropriate controls, sample size calculations, and replication needed to ensure that the data are robust and reproducible.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors described where all data underlying the findings will be made available when the study is complete?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception, at the time of publication. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above and, if applicable, provide comments about issues authors must address before this protocol can be accepted for publication. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about research or publication ethics.

You may also provide optional suggestions and comments to authors that they might find helpful in planning their study.

(Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: All questions I raised were addressed. I have no more comments. The protocol is good for publication now.

Reviewer #4: The authors have addressed all my comments. I have no further comments. I thank them for their detailed revision.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #4: No

**********

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist. SPIRIT clinical trials checklist.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0285635.s001.docx (31.5KB, docx)
    S1 Table. Hubs and enrolling sites.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0285635.s002.docx (34.9KB, docx)
    S2 Table. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0285635.s003.docx (25.7KB, docx)
    S3 Table. Inclusion into analytic groups.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0285635.s004.docx (25.7KB, docx)
    S4 Table. World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0285635.s005.docx (26.4KB, docx)
    S5 Table. Survey topics in tiers 1 and 2 questionnaires.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0285635.s006.docx (38.5KB, docx)
    S6 Table. Clinical and laboratory assessments across the tiers in the de novo RECOVER-Pediatrics cohort.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0285635.s007.docx (29.6KB, docx)
    S7 Table. Power calculations to determine minimum detectable effect sizes, stratified by age group.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0285635.s008.docx (14.2KB, docx)
    S1 Appendix. RECOVER-Pediatrics consortium members.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0285635.s009.docx (76.3KB, docx)
    S1 Protocol. RECOVER-Pediatrics protocol.

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s010.pdf (1.7MB, pdf)
    S1 Text

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s011.pdf (81.7KB, pdf)
    S2 Text

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s012.pdf (97.1KB, pdf)
    S3 Text

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s013.pdf (69.4KB, pdf)
    S4 Text

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s014.pdf (85KB, pdf)
    S5 Text

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s015.pdf (85.7KB, pdf)
    S6 Text

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s016.pdf (70.3KB, pdf)
    S1 File

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s017.pdf (1.7MB, pdf)
    S2 File

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s018.pdf (243.7KB, pdf)
    S3 File

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s019.pdf (231.4KB, pdf)
    S4 File

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s020.pdf (262.5KB, pdf)
    S5 File

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s021.pdf (235.7KB, pdf)
    S6 File

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s022.pdf (335.1KB, pdf)
    S7 File

    (PDF)

    pone.0285635.s023.pdf (204.5KB, pdf)
    S1 Data

    (ZIP)

    pone.0285635.s024.zip (71.1MB, zip)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.2023.09.29.docx

    pone.0285635.s025.docx (32.7KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES