Table 2. Overview of perceptions about the system for malaria vector control.a.
| Key itemb | Bangladesh | India/ Assam | India/ Gujarat | India/ Jharkhand | India/Tamil Nadu | Iran | Nepal | Sri Lanka | Yemen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMPACT & OUTCOMES: | |||||||||
| Disease impact | |||||||||
| Vector outcomes | |||||||||
| ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||
| a. Scaling-up, integrating vector control: | |||||||||
| Coverage | |||||||||
| Operational quality | |||||||||
| Pesticide management | |||||||||
| b. Vector surveillance and M&E: | |||||||||
| Routine entomological surveys | |||||||||
| Routine insecticide susceptibility tests | |||||||||
| Sentinel sites | |||||||||
| M&E of operations | |||||||||
| Data management and sharing | |||||||||
| c. Community mobilization: | |||||||||
| Systematic implementation | |||||||||
| Monitoring | |||||||||
| d. Intra/intersectoral collaboration: | |||||||||
| Cross-disease collaboration | |||||||||
| Intersectoral committee | |||||||||
| Intersectoral action | |||||||||
| INPUTS: | |||||||||
| Entomologists | |||||||||
| Vector control operators | |||||||||
| Training, entomology | |||||||||
| Training, operations | |||||||||
| Entomology laboratories | |||||||||
| Research input | |||||||||
| ENABLING FACTORS: | |||||||||
| Strategic plans | |||||||||
| Guidelines | |||||||||
| Organizational structure | |||||||||
a Perceptions, as described in the text, are categorized as (a) adequate, shaded green; (b) partly adequate, shaded orange (e.g., need to be upgraded or updated); (c) inadequate or absent, shaded red; or (d) no information provided, no shading.
b Key items are described in the S1 Table.