Table 6.
MIC value (mg/mL) of five eucalyptus EOs against assessed pathogens.
| Species | E. bicolor | E. loxophleba | E. campaspae | E. salubris | E. amplifolia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. baumannii | >50a | 38 ± 4a | >50a | 16 ±3a | 14 ±1a |
| E. coli | >50a | 35 ± 2b | 35± 4b | 18 ±2b | 14 ±2a |
| L. monocytogenes | 30 ± 3b | 35 ± 3b | 35 ± 2b | 14 ±2c | 15 ±2 ab |
| P. aeruginosa | 38 ± 3c | 38 ± 2a | 38 ± 4c | 14 ±2c | 15 ±1 ab |
| S. aureus | 35 ± 2d | 30 ± 3c | 28 ± 2d | 14 ±1c | 16 ±2b |
The tests were conducted three times and the results are presented as the average ± SD) With different letters, denote significant differences at p < 0.05, following one-way ANOVA and SNK post hoc test.