Table 1.

Significant clusters and local maxima in each cluster during cue presentations in the ROI analysis

Contrast	Voxels	Area	Z stat	H	x	y	z
Approach > Control
	1063	Putamen	5.22	L	-16	12	-2
		Putamen	5.13	L	-22	10	-12
		Putamen	5.04	L	-26	2	2
		Putamen	4.88	L	-22	6	6
		Putamen	4.86	L	-16	6	-12
		Putamen	4.7	L	-24	-4	8
	814	Putamen	4.71	R	24	6	6
		Putamen	4.61	R	16	4	-8
		Putamen	4.52	R	24	16	-4
		Putamen	4.42	R	24	-8	10
		Putamen	4.16	R	20	10	-12
		Putamen	4.1	R	34	0	2
	84	Brainstem	4.23	L	-8	-22	-12
		Brainstem	4.12	L	-10	-16	-8
		Brainstem	3.84	L	-4	-16	-16
	82	Brainstem	3.96	R	8	-20	-10
		Brainstem	3.94	R	8	-22	-16
		Brainstem	3.91	R	6	-14	-6
		Brainstem	3.91	R	6	-14	-14
		Thalamus	3.89	R	10	-18	-6
Avoidance > Control
	1077	Caudate	5.53	L	-18	10	0
		Caudate	5.2	L	-20	6	6
		Caudate	5.18	L	-24	0	-2
		Caudate	5.12	L	-24	2	2
		Putamen	4.95	L	-20	8	-8
		Caudate	4.79	L	-22	-6	6
	858	Caudate	5.19	R	16	6	-6
		Putamen	5.11	R	20	10	-8
		Caudate	4.84	R	22	2	2
		Caudate	4.32	R	22	-2	12
		Caudate	4.27	R	10	0	10
		Putamen	4.21	R	24	-6	12
	53	Brainstem	4.36	L	-10	-18	-8
	48	Brainstem	4.24	R	10	-18	-10
Approach > Avoidance
		NS
Avoidance > Approach
		NS

Corresponding brain region was identified by the Harvard Oxford Cortical/Subcortical atlas. NS no significant results