Table 2.

Significant cluster during success than failure outcome presentations in the ROI analysis

Contrast	Voxels	Area	Z stat	H	x	y	z
Success > Failure
	151	Caudate	4.42	L	-8	8	-8
	79	Putamen	4.11	R	16	6	-12
		Nucleus accumbens	4.05	R	10	4	-14
		Nucleus accumbens	3.72	R	8	12	-8
		Frontal orbital cortex	3.41	R	16	12	-12
Approach Success > Approach Failure
	304	Nucleus accumbens	4.83	R	10	4	-14
		Nucleus accumbens	4.66	L	-10	4	-14
		Putamen	3.78	R	18	6	-12
		Putamen	3.58	L	-20	14	-12
		Subcallosal cortex	3.5	L	-2	8	-6
	188	Frontal medial cortex	4.06	R	6	54	-8
		Frontal medial cortex	3.81	L	-4	50	-8
		Frontal pole	3.7	L	-2	60	0
		Frontal medial cortex	3.68	L	-2	54	-6
		Frontal pole	3.47	R	4	64	-4
	134	Frontal medial cortex	4.35	R	2	36	-18
		Paracingulate gyrus	3.52	R	6	36	-8
		Paracingulate gyrus	3.28	R	0	38	-10
		Frontal medial cortex	3.27	R	2	50	-18
Avoidance Success > Avoidance Failure
		NS
Approach Success > Avoidance Success
		NS
Avoidance Failure > Avoidance Success
		NS
Avoidance Failure > Approach Failure
		NS
[Approach Success - Approach Failure] > [Avoidance Success - Avoidance failure]
		NS
[Avoidance Success - Avoidance Failure] > [Approach Success - Approach Failure]
		NS

Corresponding brain region was identified by the Harvard Oxford Cortical/Subcortical atlas. NS no significant results