Skip to main content
. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0300452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300452

Table 3. Two-way ANCOVAs testing framing-RBED trait and scenario-RBED trait interactions.

Model 1 Model 2
Framing RBED Trait Framing* RBED Trait Scenario RBED Trait Scenario* RBED Trait
Knowledge and Belief Outcomes
 Knowledge Recall (range 0–11) 3.14 0.11 0.00 16.40*** 0.11 2.47
 Knowledge Application (range 0–6) 0.86 0.09 0.78 0.35 0.09 0.00
 Causal Beliefs (range 1–5)
  Genetic 0.59 9.74** 0.14 1.72 9.74** 0.11
  Environment 3.11 1.78 0.05 0.65 1.78 0.10
  Willpower 0.00 0.05 0.15 0.38 0.05 0.30
Empathy Outcomes
 Empathetic Concern (range 1–7) 0.06 5.52* 0.62 12.29*** 5.53* 1.83
 Perspective Taking (range 1–7) 0.10 14.75*** 0.06 10.94** 14.92*** 6.26*
Weight Bias Outcomes
 Weight Stereotype (range 1–5)
  Negative 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.03 0.00 1.99
  Positive 0.39 2.96 4.75* 1.10 2.94 0.83
 Weight Stigma (range 1–5)
  Dislike 0.15 3.69 0.07 2.43 3.69 0.01
  Fear 1.83 8.90** 0.06 0.41 8.90** 0.26
  Willpower 0.10 1.63 1.37 1.78 1.63 0.36
Behavior Change Motivation Outcomes
 Confidence (range 1–5) 1.52 39.18*** 3.59 0.08 39.02 1.39
 Self Efficacy (range 1–5)
  Healthy Eating 0.27 20.69*** 5.59* 0.12 20.53*** 1.320
  Healthy Weight 0.12 56.81*** 4.46* 0.00 56.36*** 0.14
 Intention (range 1–5) 1.21 80.59*** 0.07 0.25 80.59*** 0.05

Notes.

*p < .05

** p < .01

*** p < .001.

The table shows F values. Model 1 controlled for scenario. Model 2 controlled for framing.