Skip to main content
. 2024 May 8;6(5):e1092. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001092

TABLE 3.

Win Ratio of Composite Major Adverse Pulmonary Events for Patients Receiving High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation

Tier Outcome Overall Cohort Matched Cohort
NIV Wins HFNC Wins Ties NIV Wins HFNC Wins Ties
1 Time to death (28-d mortality) 77,511 (24.9%) 41,718 (13.4%) 191,499 (61.6%) 23,811 (21.3%) 16,321 (14.6%) 71,424 (64.0%)
2 Ventilator-free days 39,220 (12.6%) 35,714 (11.5%) 116,565 (37.5%) 11,833 (10.6%) 14,006 (12.6%) 45,585 (40.9%)
3 Noninvasive respiratory support hours 73,207 (23.6%) 38,171 (12.3%) 5,187 (1.7%) 27,909 (25.0%) 15,712 (14.1%) 1,964 (1.8%)
Totals, by category 189,938 (61.1%) 115,603 (37.2%) 5,187 (1.7%) 63,553 (57.0%) 46,039 (41.3%) 1,964 (1.8%)
Total possible pairs 310,728 111,556
Win ratio (95% CI), p 1.64 (1.42–1.90), p < 0.001 1.38 (1.15–1.65), p < 0.001

HFNC = high-flow nasal cannula, NIV= noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.

Details of the win ratio used to calculate the composite major adverse pulmonary events in the overall cohort (n = 1154) and in the matched study cohort (n = 668). The win ratio in the matched cohort is the primary outcome, which is also displayed visually in Figure 2. Ventilator-free days were calculated from admission through day 28. Noninvasive respiratory support hours were hours spent on HFNC or NIV calculated from initiation through hour 72. The win ratio is the ratio of overall “wins for NIV” over “wins for HFNC.” A positive win ratio suggests NIV results in a better composite outcome compared with HFNC. Percentages represent the percent of pairs out of the total possible pairs. On tier 1 (time to death) and overall, the percentages sum to 100% because all patient pairs are compared at these levels. However, tiers 2 and 3 only compare patients who tied on the previous tier. For example, in tier 2 (ventilator-free days), the percentages add to the number of patients who tied on the previous tier.