Table 4.
PFAS compounds screened in this study and reported in published literature to disrupt mammalian thyroid hormone system in vivo.
|
|
|
In vivo reference | Assays in which chemical was active (≥20% activity) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Acronym | CASRN | hDIO1 | hDIO2 | hDIO3 | hlYD | hTTR | hTBG | hTPO | |
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid | PFBS | 375-73-5 | NTP, 2019 | –a | – | – | – | Xb | – | – |
Potassium perfluorobutanesulfonate | K-PFBS | 29,420-49-3 | Ladics et al., 2008 | – | – | – | – | Xb | – | – |
Potassium perfluorohexanesulfonate | K-PFHxS | 3871-99-6 | Ramhøj et al., 2020, Butenhoff et al., 2009a, b, Ramhøj et al., 2018 | – | – | – | – | Xb | – | – |
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid | PFOS | 1763-23-1 | Dong et al., 2016 | Xb | Xb | – | Xb | Xb | X | X |
Potassium perfluorooctanesulfonate | PFOS-K | 2795-39-3 | Seacat et al., 2002, Chang et al., 2008, Thibodeaux et al., 2003, Lau et al., 2003, Yu et al., 2009, Yu et al., 2011, Chang et al., 2009, Martin et al., 2007, Curran et al., 2008, Luebker et al., 2005, Wang et al., 2011 | Xb | Xb | – | Xb | Xb | X | X |
Perfluorobutanoic acid | PFBA | 375-22-4 | Butenhoff et al., 2012 | – | – | – | – | Xb | – | – |
Perfluorohexanoic acid | PFHxA | 307-24-4 | NTP, 2019 | – | – | – | – | Xb | – | – |
Perfluorooctanoic acid | PFOA | 335-67-1 | NTP, 2019 | – | X | – | X | Xb | X | – |
Ammonium perfluorooctanoate | APFOA | 3825-26-1 | Martin et al., 2007, Butenhoff et al., 2002 | – | – | – | X | Xb | X | – |
Perfluorononanoic acid | PFNA | 375-95-1 | NTP, 2019 | X | X | – | Xb | Xb | X | X |
Perfluorodecanoic acid | PFDA | 335-76-2 |
Gutshall et al., 1989, Langley and Pilcher, 1985, Van Rafelghem et al., 1987, NTP, 2019 |
Xb | Xb | Xb | Xb | Xb | X | – |
Perfluorotetradecanoic acid | PFTEDA | 376-06-7 | Hirata-Koizumi., 2015 | Xb | X | Xb | – | Xb | X | – |
8:2 Fluorotelomer alcohol | 8:2 FTOH |
678-39-7 | Ladics et al., 2008 | – | X | – | – | – | – | – |
Chemicals were deemed in vivo active if changes in hormone levels or thyroid gland histopathology were reported.
Not active (– -) in this screening study (<20% activity).
≥50% activity and EC50 could be calculated in concentration response testing.