Table 3.
Primary outcome: change in distress between baseline and follow-up (12 weeks)a.
|
|
Interventionb | Controlc | Analysis of covariance | ||||||||||||||
|
|
Values, n | Values, mean (SD) | Values, n | Values, mean (SD) | F test (df) | P value | ηp² | ||||||||||
| Intention-to-treat | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
Baseline | 99 | 6.0 (2.1) | 119 | 6.0 (2.4) | N/Ad | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
|
|
Follow-up | 99 | 5.1 (2.5) | 119 | 5.9 (2.5) | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
|
|
Change | 99 | –0.8 (2.8) | 119 | –0.1 (2.9) | 4.7 (1, 215) | .03 | 0.02 | |||||||||
| Per-protocol | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
Baseline | 50 | 6.0 (2.2) | 74 | 5.7 (2.2) | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
|
|
Follow-up | 50 | 4.8 (2.8) | 74 | 5.9 (2.4) | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
|
|
Change | 50 | –1.2 (3.2) | 74 | 0.2 (2.8) | 6.9 (1, 121) | .01 | 0.05 | |||||||||
aAn analysis of covariance was used to test for differences in change in distress levels between groups from baseline to follow-up (12 weeks), controlling for baseline. The partial eta–squared is the reported standardized effect size for the mean difference. The effect sizes can be interpreted as small, medium, or large at ≥0.01, ≥0.06, and ≥0.14, respectively. The results of the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis are reported.
bIntervention=12-week access to digital therapeutic app intervention+usual care.
cControl=usual care.
dN/A: not applicable.