Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 19;24(15):4840–4850. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000835

Table 3.

Direct age-adjusted associations between psychosocial inputs and food group intake outcome variables by sex and area of residence,

Outcome variable General sample (n 813) Girls subsample (n 519) Boys subsample (n 294) Rural subsample (n 405) Urban subsample (n 408)
Predictor: gender-based stereotypes
  Fruits and vegetables (g/d) 0·03 0·12* −0·07 −0·04 0·06
  Legumes (g/d) 0·10* 0·16** −0·01 0·06 0·10
  Sugary drinks (g/d) 0·11* 0·03 0·22* 0·08 0·14*
  Ultra-processed foods (g/d) −0·04 −0·06 −0·01 −0·01 −0·04
  Fast food (g/d) −0·09* −0·19** 0·03 −0·08 −0·09
Predictor: family meals
  Fruits and vegetables (g/d) 0·02 −0·01 0·06 0·05 0·01
  Legumes (g/d) 0·12* 0·17** 0·06 0·21** 0·05
  Sugary drinks (g/d) −0·03 −0·01 −0·06 −0·05 −0·03
  Ultra-processed foods (g/d) 0·02 0·02 0·01 0·06 −0·03
  Fast food (g/d) −0·04 −0·10 0·03 0·01 −0·08
Predictor: parenting styles (authoritative, authoritarian coefficients)
  Fruits and vegetables (g/d) 0·11*, 0·03 0·07, −0·01 0·18*, 0·09 0·06, 0·13* 0·11, 0·00
  Legumes (g/d) −0·00, −0·05 −0·00, −0·05 −0·06, −0·11 0·00, 0·05 −0·06, −0·09
  Sugary drinks (g/d) 0·06, 0·05 0·06, 0·11* 0·05, −0·04 0·13***, −0·03 0·04, 0·08
  Ultra-processed foods (g/d) 0·07, 0·01 0·08, 0·04 0·04, −0·04 0·07, −0·07 0·08, 0·09
  Fast food (g/d) 0·04, 0·00 0·07, 0·05 −0·01, −0·07 −0·04, −0·06 0·12***, 0·05

*P < 0·05; **P < 0·01; ***P = 0·05.

Data derived from SEM analysis.

Relationships between psychosocial inputs and food intake outcome variables are expressed in terms of standardised regression coefficients (β).