Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Mar 5;55(6):3686–3695. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07296

Table 1.

Summary statistics for PFAS measured in this study.1

PFAS Detection
Frequency2
[%]
Mean pM concentration (±SD) [ng L−1]3 Mean composition (±SD) [%]
AFFF
watershed
(n = 41)
non-AFFF
watershed
(n = 13)
Mann-Whitney U Test4
[U-value]
AFFF
watershed
(n = 41)
non-AFFF
watershed
(n = 13)
Mann-Whitney U Test4
[U-value]
Σ 13 PFAA 5 100 600±273 [236] 35.0±6.0 [11] *** [0] 80±5 74±16 [217]
PFBA 83 25.8±14.3 [5] 6.05±1.99 [1] *** [10] 4±2 13±5 *** [21]
PFPeA 91 61.6±40.8 [16] 4.60±1.37 [1] *** [0] 8±4 10±3 * [149]
PFHxA 98 67.6±41.7 [21] 4.84±2.63 [2] *** [0] 9±2 10±5 [254]
PFHpA 87 28.6±15.2 [10] 2.21±0.75 [1] *** [0] 4±1 5±1 [177]
PFOA 94 40.7±16.6 [17] 2.95±1.28 [1] *** [1] 6±1 6±3 [228]
PFNA 83 28.4±22.1 [13] 0.78±0.39 [0.4] *** [0] 4±3 2±1 ** [126]
PFBS 100 12.8±3.27 [4] 6.06±1.69 [2] *** [20] 2±1 13±3 *** [2]
PFPeS 81 12.3±5.3 [4] 1.57±0.67 [1] *** [3] 2±0 4±2 ** [119]
l-PFHxS 100 131±99 [52] 1.96±0.65 [1] *** [0] 17±5 4±1 *** [4]
br-PFHxS 80 21.5±15.9 [9] 2.03±0.96 [1] *** [7] 3±1 4±2 * [169]
PFHpS 80 4.83±2.83 [2] 0.47±0.22 [0.2] *** [6] 1±0 1±1 [204]
l-PFOS 98 117±71 [58] 0.71±0.21 [0.4] *** [0] 15±5 2±1 *** [0]
br-PFOS 96 47.5±23.2 [24] 0.74±0.20 [0.4] *** [0] 6±2 2±1 *** [2]
ΣPrecursors 5 100 157±113 14.5±11.7 *** [8] 20±5 26±16 [217]
4:2 FT 100 5.77±3.01 3.50±4.40 *** [95] 1±1 6±6 *** [22]
6:2 FT 100 15.6±34.8 1.02±1.55 *** [24] 2±4 2±3 [266]
8:2 FT 100 8.7±24.4 0.75±1.56 *** [73] 1±2 2±3 [210]
C4 ECF 100 23.1±16.4 4.54±4.78 *** [36] 3±1 8±7 ** [128]
C5 ECF 100 12.6±9.2 0.72±0.60 *** [4] 2±0 1±1 * [166]
C6 ECF 100 86.8±63.6 1.35±2.05 *** [0] 11±3 2±3 *** [32]
C7 ECF 100 1.55±1.01 0.70±0.92 *** [107] 0±0 1±1 *** [38]
C8 ECF 100 2.43±1.76 1.88±3.23 ** [130] 0±0 3±5 [260]
1

Data reported are for PFAS detected in greater than 70% of samples.

2

Across all samples collected in this study.

3

Mean concentrations for targeted PFAA in ng L−1 are presented in square brackets.

4

Levels of statistical significance:

*=

p ≤ 0.05,

**=

p ≤ 0.01,

***=

p ≤ 0.001

5

PFAA concentrations were quantitated from targeted analysis while precursor concentrations were inferred from the TOP assay.