Table 2.
Type of implants used for the revision with related data on Paprosky classification, length of the follow-up, and causes for revision (FU: follow-up).
| Type of Implant | Patients (n) |
Paprosky | Mean FU (years) | Mean age | Fracture (n) |
Septic Loosening (n) |
Aseptic Loosening (n) |
Other (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLS (Zimmer Biomet) | 12 | I–II | 4.2 | 56.0 | 2 | 9 | 3 | |
| GTS (Zimmer Biomet) | 2 | I–II | 4.5 | 69.5 | 2 | |||
| MS-30 (Zimmer Biomet) | 3 | I–IV | 4.0 | 70.6 | 1 | 2 | ||
| PYRAMID (Zimmer Biomet) | 2 | I–II | 2.5 | 65.5 | 2 | |||
| WAGNER KONUS (Zimmer Biomet) | 5 | I–III | 5.2 | 54.8 | 1 | 4 | ||
| WAGNER REVISION 190/225 (Zimmer Biomet) | 18 | I–IV | 4.4 | 58.6 | 2 | 16 | ||
| ARCOS (Zimmer Biomet) | 3 | II–IV | 5.3 | 69.9 | 3 |