Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 30;25(9):4935. doi: 10.3390/ijms25094935

Table 5.

Comparing the serum anti-JMJD6 antibody (s-JMJD6-Ab) levels between healthy donors (HDs) and patients with esophageal cancer (EC), gastric cancer (GC), lung cancer (LC), and mammary cancer (MC).

Sample Information HD EC GC LC MC
Total sample number 96 192 96 96 96
male/female 51/45 155/37 68/28 42/54 58/38
Age (median ± SD) 57.0 ± 6.0 68.0 ± 9.8 69.0 ± 10.6 63.0 ± 13.3 69.0 ± 9.6
Subject Type of value s-JMJD6-Ab
HD Median 734
Cutoff value 2629
Positive no. 4
Positive rate (%) 4.2%
EC Median 1755
Positive no. 67
Positive rate (%) 34.9%
p-value (vs. HD) <0.0001
GC Median 1646
Positive no. 29
Positive rate (%) 30.2%
p-value (vs. HD) <0.0001
LC Median 1140
Positive no. 21
Positive rate (%) 21.9%
p-value (vs. HD) 0.0031
MC Median 992
Positive no. 19
Positive rate (%) 19.8%
p-value (vs. HD) 0.0054

The upper panel of Table 5 provides information on the participants, including the total numbers of samples collected, the numbers of samples obtained from male and female participants, and their age distributions (median ± SD). The lower panel shows the results of the s-JMJD6-Abs with purified JMJD6 protein as an antigen. Positive antibody levels were determined according to the cutoff values set at the 95th percentile of the HDs. The Kruskal–Wallis test and Bonferroni correction were used for p-value calculation and multiple comparisons. SD, standard deviation. no., number. vs., versus. p-values of <0.05 and positive rate of >10% are marked in bold.