Table 2.
Peptide candidates selected for experimental validation
High efficacy (HE) | Low efficacy (LE) | Alternative predictor (AP) | |||||||
Sequence | ES | ΔE | Sequence | ES | ΔE | Sequence | ES | ΔE | |
1 | GLLALAIGL | 42.3 | −14.9 | LEAPGLAPLSQ | 0.0 | −13.7 | YLAEADLSYT | 0.0 | −9.8 |
SLLGLLALA | 35.7 | −6.3 | VAQSLENYTSKC | 0.0 | −1.3 | SMDEANQPL | 0.0 | −1.7 | |
ALGGLVVSA | 30.6 | −10.8 | AHFIYGYPKK | 0.0 | −6.2 | LLQEGLKPVL | 0.0 | −5.3 | |
VLTALLAGL | 21.2 | −14.5 | DTLPVPSGQR | 0.0 | −1.7 | MLQDWCRWMGV | 0.0 | −18.4 | |
ALAIGLWGL | 20.9 | −16.8 | LLLAACAPPPC | 0.0 | −22.2 | FTLTNYTYCV | 0.0 | −14.3 | |
2 | LLAVLYCLL | 20.6 | −1.1 | TDQVPFSVSVSQ | 0.0 | −8.3 | YVAGSVILNI | 0.0 | −11.0 |
TFLILSIAPV | 19.6 | −2.4 | CLPRLPSPPGP | 0.0 | −12.5 | KLNEDMTLL | 0.0 | −8.3 | |
ILAFLVLEAV | 19.1 | −8.0 | SLEAALRPMG | 0.0 | −8.0 | YLHSDKLKV | 0.0 | −13.7 | |
TLLVVVQPV | 18.0 | −19.9 | DREAVAACQVGD | 0.0 | −0.1 | RMQCESPPV | 0.0 | −2.9 | |
LLSLGCIFFPL | 18.0 | −9.9 | YLGALCENTCL | 0.0 | −1.4 | HMSVELLRSV | 0.0 | −10.4 | |
3 | LLVALIFGT* | 16.9 | −25.4 | VRVLVARLGH | 0.0 | −11.5 | FLQNAVYINL | 0.0 | −8.1 |
MILGILASLV | 16.7 | −16.5 | LAELNRIPSS | 0.0 | −2.5 | FQNMSTFSI | 0.0 | −3.3 | |
LLGAAMVGA | 15.9 | −13.2 | APHKEHLYKLL | 0.0 | −3.5 | RMGNPALSV | 0.0 | −4.5 | |
FSGGILAFLV | 13.6 | −18.8 | IAHNRGEERN | 0.0 | 1.5 | LQLEGRKLWRV | 0.0 | −9.9 | |
LLLIGCWYC | 12.5 | −26.1 | DSESKSAVQA | 0.0 | −1.6 | LLLLLAACA | 0.0 | −15.3 | |
4 | IYSMIFVILGV* | 11.8 | −17.5 | PTSGCLGPVPRE | 0.0 | −9.4 | YQAGCSLRL | 0.0 | −7.4 |
VLIFPSYMTTV | 11.5 | −8.3 | KASKGSYMEVRT | 0.0 | −3.8 | HFLRNQPLTFAL | 0.0 | −9.0 | |
LVLMAVVLAS* | 11.2 | −12.4 | AGTDAAGASGLQ | 0.0 | −14.9 | RMAALRTQTL | 0.0 | −3.7 | |
GLSVIISFI | 9.9 | −24.5 | VRCQSLGVFSG | 0.0 | −14.1 | FRIYKRICSV | 0.0 | 2.0 | |
GLLALAIGLWGL | 9.2 | −18.5 | QGPLLGPEAVT | 0.0 | −12.3 | KLKLCSISGL | 0.0 | −10.7 |
Each major column lists peptides of one tier, with tiers subdivided into pools of size 5. High-efficacy peptides are sorted by efficacy score.
*Peptide failed synthesis was absent from the pool during experimental tests.
ES, efficacy score (unitless); ΔE, free-energy gain of MHC-peptide complex after computational docking as calculated by RDOCK (kcal·mol-1).