Skip to main content
. 2024 May 9;12(5):e008104. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008104

Table 2.

Peptide candidates selected for experimental validation

High efficacy (HE) Low efficacy (LE) Alternative predictor (AP)
Sequence ES ΔE Sequence ES ΔE Sequence ES ΔE
1 GLLALAIGL 42.3 −14.9 LEAPGLAPLSQ 0.0 −13.7 YLAEADLSYT 0.0 −9.8
SLLGLLALA 35.7 −6.3 VAQSLENYTSKC 0.0 −1.3 SMDEANQPL 0.0 −1.7
ALGGLVVSA 30.6 −10.8 AHFIYGYPKK 0.0 −6.2 LLQEGLKPVL 0.0 −5.3
VLTALLAGL 21.2 −14.5 DTLPVPSGQR 0.0 −1.7 MLQDWCRWMGV 0.0 −18.4
ALAIGLWGL 20.9 −16.8 LLLAACAPPPC 0.0 −22.2 FTLTNYTYCV 0.0 −14.3
2 LLAVLYCLL 20.6 −1.1 TDQVPFSVSVSQ 0.0 −8.3 YVAGSVILNI 0.0 −11.0
TFLILSIAPV 19.6 −2.4 CLPRLPSPPGP 0.0 −12.5 KLNEDMTLL 0.0 −8.3
ILAFLVLEAV 19.1 −8.0 SLEAALRPMG 0.0 −8.0 YLHSDKLKV 0.0 −13.7
TLLVVVQPV 18.0 −19.9 DREAVAACQVGD 0.0 −0.1 RMQCESPPV 0.0 −2.9
LLSLGCIFFPL 18.0 −9.9 YLGALCENTCL 0.0 −1.4 HMSVELLRSV 0.0 −10.4
3 LLVALIFGT* 16.9 −25.4 VRVLVARLGH 0.0 −11.5 FLQNAVYINL 0.0 −8.1
MILGILASLV 16.7 −16.5 LAELNRIPSS 0.0 −2.5 FQNMSTFSI 0.0 −3.3
LLGAAMVGA 15.9 −13.2 APHKEHLYKLL 0.0 −3.5 RMGNPALSV 0.0 −4.5
FSGGILAFLV 13.6 −18.8 IAHNRGEERN 0.0 1.5 LQLEGRKLWRV 0.0 −9.9
LLLIGCWYC 12.5 −26.1 DSESKSAVQA 0.0 −1.6 LLLLLAACA 0.0 −15.3
4 IYSMIFVILGV* 11.8 −17.5 PTSGCLGPVPRE 0.0 −9.4 YQAGCSLRL 0.0 −7.4
VLIFPSYMTTV 11.5 −8.3 KASKGSYMEVRT 0.0 −3.8 HFLRNQPLTFAL 0.0 −9.0
LVLMAVVLAS* 11.2 −12.4 AGTDAAGASGLQ 0.0 −14.9 RMAALRTQTL 0.0 −3.7
GLSVIISFI 9.9 −24.5 VRCQSLGVFSG 0.0 −14.1 FRIYKRICSV 0.0 2.0
GLLALAIGLWGL 9.2 −18.5 QGPLLGPEAVT 0.0 −12.3 KLKLCSISGL 0.0 −10.7

Each major column lists peptides of one tier, with tiers subdivided into pools of size 5. High-efficacy peptides are sorted by efficacy score.

*Peptide failed synthesis was absent from the pool during experimental tests.

ES, efficacy score (unitless); ΔE, free-energy gain of MHC-peptide complex after computational docking as calculated by RDOCK (kcal·mol-1).