Skip to main content
. 2024 May 1;14(5):e075016. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075016

Table 2.

Effects and costs by treatment group and difference at 24-month follow-up

Pessary therapy
n=218
Surgery
n=221
Unadjusted difference
(95% CI)
Effects
PGI-I, n (%) 164 (75.1) 179 (80.8) −0.06 (−0.15; 0.04)
QALY, mean (SE) 1.80 (0.02) 1.82 (0.01) −0.02 (−0.06; 0.02)
Costs, mean (SE)
Intervention costs 178 (0.2) 4640 (0) −4462 (−4463; −4462)
Primary care costs 18 (2) 15 (2) 3 (−3; 8)
Secondary care costs 3736 (174) 1127 (80) 2609 (2232; 2982)
Healthcare costs 3932 (174) 5782 (80) −1850 (−2228; −1476)
Absenteeism from paid work 362 (117) 390 (120) −28 (−338; 290)
Societal costs 4294 (227) 6172 (150) −1878 (−2395 to to 1345)

Intervention costs in the pessary group=costs of pessary device and pessary placement consultation at baseline. Intervention costs in the surgery group=DBC costs of surgery at baseline which included one follow-up consultation at 6 weeks. Primary care costs=costs of general practitioner or other healthcare professional consultations apart from the prescheduled follow-up consultations because of complaints related to pelvic organ prolapse symptoms. Secondary care costs=costs of follow-up scheduled consultations with gynaecologists attended by patients and extra consultations due to complications, costs of hospital readmissions due to complications, surgeries after pessary, resurgeries and costs of pessary change.

PGI-I is presented as the difference between groups in the proportion of participants reporting improvement.

%, proportion; DBC, Diagnose Behandeling Combinatie; n, number of participants; PGI-I, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (1=improvement; 0=no improvement); QALY, quality-adjusted life-year; SE, standard error.