Table 2.
The relationship between OBS and ED descripted by weighted logistic regression.
| Exposure | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| OBS (continious) | 0.96 | 0.94, 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.94, 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.94, 0.98 |
| OBS (tertiles) | ||||||
| Q1 [3, 16] | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Q2 (16,24] | 0.72 | 0.56, 0.93 | 0.65 | 0.49, 0.87 | 0.67 | 0.50, 0.90 |
| Q3 (24,36] | 0.47 | 0.33, 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.38, 0.82 | 0.57 | 0.37, 0.87 |
| P for trend | < 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.012 | |||
Model 1: No covariates were adjusted; Model 2: Age, race, poverty income ratio, education and marital status were adjusted; Model 3: Age, race, poverty income ratio, education and marital status, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, hypercholesterolemia, and chronic kidney diseases were adjusted. OBS oxidative balance score, OR odd ratio, CI confidential interval.