Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 30;36:100350. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2024.100350

Table 3.

Impact of sex used for estimated glomerular filtration calculation in the population taking gender-affirming hormones.

Estradiol cohort1 eGFR category for CKD if male used for eGFR calculation2,3
eGFR category for CKD if female used for eGFR calculation2,3
1 2 3a 3b 4 5
1 530
2 318 53
3a 61
3b 15 1
4 1
5 9 4



Testosterone cohort1 eGFR category for CKD if male used for eGFR calculation2,3
eGFR category for CKD if female used for eGFR calculation2,3 1 2 3a 3b 4 5
1 345
2 99 20
3a 25
3b 5 1
4 2 1
5 1

1The estradiol data consisted of 992 creatinine measurements on 406 unique patients 18 years and older taking estradiol as gender-affirming therapy. Observed agreement 0.59, weighted κ 0.40 (95 % CI 0.35–0.46).

2Abbreviations: CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

3eGFR category for CKD: stage 1, normal or high (eGFR > 90 ml/min/173 m2); stage 2, mildly decreased (eGFR 60–89); stage 3a, mildly to moderately decreased (eGFR 45–59); stage 3b, moderately to severely decreased (eGFR 30–44); stage 4, severely decreased (eGFR 15–29); stage 5, kidney failure (eGFR < 15). eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI (2021) eGFR equation without race refit.

4The testosterone data consisted of 477 creatinine measurements on 214 unique patients 18 years and older taking testosterone as gender-affirming therapy. Observed agreement 0.74, weighted κ 0.46 (95 % CI 0.38–0.54).