Skip to main content
. 2024 May 12;15:115. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01703-x

Table 4.

Difference between active and inactive segment in training set

Parameters None-active (n = 64) Active (n = 77) p value
Age (years) 28.000 [23.000, 33.000] 29.000 [23.000, 37.000] 0.382
Sex (F/M) 27/37 34/43 0.814
Wall thickening (mm) 3.000 [2.000, 5.000] 7.000 [5.000, 8.000] < 0.001
Segmental mural hyperenhancement (Stratified/Homogeneous) 6/58 21/56 0.007
Stricture (Yes/No) 3/61 29/48 < 0.001
with upstream dilation (Yes/No) 0/64 8/69 nan
Fibrofatty proliferation 10/54 28/49 0.006
Engorged vasa recta (Yes/No) 0/64 30/47 nan
Inflammation (Yes/No) 3/61 19/58 0.001
Regional Lymph node (diameter ≥ 0.5 cm) (Yes/No) 14/50 43/34 < 0.001
Arterial Phase
  Zeff 7.900 [7.700, 8.160] 8.360 [8.160, 8.535] < 0.001
  IC (mg/mL) 1.030 [0.680, 1.500] 2.010 [1.550, 2.350] < 0.001
  NIC 0.095 [0.065, 0.129] 0.160 [0.120, 0.188] < 0.001
  λ HU 1.272 [0.910, 1.775] 2.433 [1.745, 2.923] < 0.001
Venous Phase
  Zeff 8.076 ± 0.237 8.305 ± 0.191 < 0.001
  IC (mg/mL) 1.377 ± 0.481 1.851 ± 0.427 < 0.001
  NIC 0.318 ± 0.098 0.405 ± 0.096 < 0.001
  λ HU 1.691 ± 0.603 2.322 ± 0.515 < 0.001

Zeff Z-effective, IC iodine concentration, NIC normalised iodine concentration, λ HU slope of the energy spectrum curve