Table 3:
B | SE | 95% CI | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | ||||
Age (24–74) | −.054 | .007 | [−.068, −.039] | .000 |
Gender | .317 | .197 | [−.070, .704] | .108 |
Educational Attainment (1–12) | .158 | .044 | [.071, .244] | .000 |
Income ($) | .001 | .000 | [.000, .001] | .000 |
Race (Black) | −.698 | .731 | [13.754, 16.622] | .000 |
Model 2 | ||||
Age (24–74 years) | −.054 | .007 | [−.068, −.039] | .000 |
Gender | .312 | .197 | [−.074, .698] | .113 |
Educational Attainment (1–12) | .136 | .045 | [.048, .225] | .003 |
Income ($) | .001 | .000 | [.000, .001] | .000 |
Race (Black) | −4.490 | 1.441 | [−7.317, −1.663] | .000 |
Race (Black) X Educational Attainment | .390 | .174 | [.049, .732] | .025 |
Note: The large CI for black people in Model 1, could be explained by small sample size.