Skip to main content
. 2024 May 13;22:193. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03397-w

Table 2.

Rating constructs, definitions, and rating scales used in all three rounds of expert panel ratings

Rating construct Definition and rating scales
Necessity of review

For an average patient treated with antidepressants in primary care:

Assuming no overprescribing/high-risk prescribing, how necessarya is it to conduct a critical review* of antidepressant use within the next 3 months in order to prevent adverse effects/reduce medication burden?

1–3 = not necessary; 4–6 = might be necessary; 7–9 = clearly necessary

Likelihood of harm

How likely is it that the patient will experience an adverse drug reaction if the clinical situation was to be continued for another year?

1–3 = unlikely; 4–6 = possible; 7–9 = probable

Severity of harm

If the patient experienced an adverse drug event as a result of antidepressant use, how severe would it be?

1–3 = minor; 4–6 = moderate; 7–9 = major

aSee the “Methods” section for further detail regarding the definitions of a critical review and the rating construct of necessary